Intel Arc Pro A60 vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Intel Arc Pro A60 and the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. The Arc Pro A60 has two benchmark entries in the database: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63485 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 57166, producing an average benchmark score of 60326. The Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores, leaving its average at 0 with no comparable data points.

The Arc Pro A60 sits at the 88th percentile among all GPUs in the database, while the Graphics 24EU Mobile ranks at the 50th percentile. The Arc Pro A60's nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 with an average score of 60347 (a delta of 0 percent), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 at 60140 (0.3 percent ahead), the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M at 61896 (2.5 percent behind), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 at 58657 (2.8 percent ahead). These figures place the Arc Pro A60 in the upper tier of professional graphics hardware.

Because the Graphics 24EU Mobile lacks any benchmark entries, a numerical comparison of compute performance cannot be established from the database. The disparity in shading units, texture mapping units, and render output units between the two parts suggests a wide performance gap, but the absence of recorded scores for the integrated GPU prevents a quantified delta.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Pro A60 uses the DG2-256 chip built on the Xe-HPG architecture, belonging to the Alchemist Pro Series generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 42.8 million transistors per square millimeter. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Twin Lake chip built on the Xe-LP architecture, belonging to the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown in the database.

The Arc Pro A60 operates with a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 2050 MHz, while the Graphics 24EU Mobile runs at a 300 MHz base and 1000 MHz boost. Memory configurations differ entirely: the Arc Pro A60 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective), whereas the Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

Compute resources diverge sharply. The Arc Pro A60 carries 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 16 ray tracing cores. The Graphics 24EU Mobile has 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, 4 render output units, and no ray tracing cores. Pixel rate for the Arc Pro A60 is 131.2 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s for the integrated part. Texture rate is 262.4 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 8.397 TFLOPS versus 384.0 GFLOPS, and FP16 throughput is 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1).

Power characteristics differ by an order of magnitude. The Arc Pro A60 has a 130 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 300 W, while the Graphics 24EU Mobile has a 6 W TDP and no suggested PSU. The Arc Pro A60 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface and is single-slot, while the Graphics 24EU Mobile uses a Ring Bus interface and is an IGP (integrated graphics processor). Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 2.0 on the Arc Pro A60 versus portable-device-dependent outputs on the Graphics 24EU Mobile.

API support shows a minor difference. The Arc Pro A60 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The DirectX feature level difference reflects the Arc Pro A60's newer hardware capabilities.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60 has an average benchmark score of 60326, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores and an average of 0.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two?

A: The Arc Pro A60 is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the Graphics 24EU Mobile uses a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: Does the Graphics 24EU Mobile support ray tracing?

A: No. The Graphics 24EU Mobile has no ray tracing cores listed, while the Arc Pro A60 includes 16 ray tracing cores.

Q: How do the memory systems differ?

A: The Arc Pro A60 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

Q: What DirectX versions do the two support?

A: The Arc Pro A60 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1).

Q: Which GPU has the higher boost clock?

A: The Arc Pro A60 boosts to 2050 MHz, compared to 1000 MHz on the Graphics 24EU Mobile.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc Pro A60 | Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | DG2-256 | Twin Lake |

| Architecture | Xe-HPG | Xe-LP |

| Generation | Alchemist (Pro Series) | HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 11,500 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 269 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 42.8M / mm² | null |

| Base Clock | 900 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz | 1000 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | System Shared |

| Memory Size | 12 GB | System Shared |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | System Shared |

| Bus Width | 192 bit | System Shared |

| Bandwidth | 384.0 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 192 |

| TMUs | 128 | 12 |

| ROPs | 64 | 4 |

| RT Cores | 16 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 131.2 GPixel/s | 4.000 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 262.4 GTexel/s | 12.00 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 8.397 TFLOPS | 384.0 GFLOPS |

| FP16 | 16.79 TFLOPS (2:1) | 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 130 W | 6 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | IGP |

| Suggested PSU | 300 W | null |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | Ring Bus |

| Display Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.0 | Portable Device Dependent |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |

| Release Date | 2023-06-05 | 2024-12-31 |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 88 | 50 |

| Avg Benchmark Score | 60326 | 0 |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Pro A60 wins on every measurable specification where data exists. Its FP32 throughput of 8.397 TFLOPS is roughly 21.9 times the 384.0 GFLOPS of the Graphics 24EU Mobile. Pixel rate is 32.8 times higher at 131.2 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 21.9 times higher at 262.4 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s. The Arc Pro A60 has 16 ray tracing cores where the integrated part has none, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) versus DirectX 12 (12_1) on the Graphics 24EU Mobile.

The Arc Pro A60's 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth provides a substantial advantage over system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. Its PCIe 4.0 x16 interface offers a direct high-bandwidth connection to the host, whereas the Graphics 24EU Mobile uses a Ring Bus, which is typical of integrated graphics sharing system resources. The discrete card's 4x DisplayPort 2.0 outputs enable multi-display professional setups, while the integrated part's outputs depend on the portable device.

The Graphics 24EU Mobile wins in power efficiency. Its 6 W TDP is dramatically lower than the Arc Pro A60's 130 W TDP, and it requires no suggested PSU, making it suitable for compact, battery-powered devices. Its integration as an IGP eliminates the need for a separate card slot and additional cooling. The database places it at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, which indicates a mid-range standing for an integrated solution, though its lack of recorded benchmark scores limits quantitative verification.

The Arc Pro A60's 88th percentile ranking and its proximity to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 (0 percent delta), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 (0.3 percent ahead), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 (2.8 percent ahead) place it firmly in the high-performance workstation segment. The Graphics 24EU Mobile has no nearest rivals recorded, which reflects its position as a low-power integrated part without competing discrete GPU comparisons.

The release dates differ by roughly a year and a half: the Arc Pro A60 launched on 2023-06-05, while the Graphics 24EU Mobile launched on 2024-12-31. Both remain in active production status according to the database. The Arc Pro A60 targets professional workloads requiring sustained compute throughput, dedicated memory bandwidth, and multi-display outputs. The Graphics 24EU Mobile targets portable devices where power draw is the primary constraint and performance expectations are modest.