Intel Arc Graphics 24EU vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU and Lisuan Tech LX MAX occupy entirely different positions in the recorded data. The Intel part is an integrated graphics solution built on the Arrow Lake-S chip, using the Xe-LPG architecture on a 3 nm TSMC process. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is a discrete dual-slot card built on the 7G106 chip with the TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process. The database records only one benchmark result for the Intel part, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, where it scores 733 points. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no recorded benchmark scores at all, so its wins cannot be established from direct measurements.

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU shows a percentile rank of 3 against all GPUs, meaning it sits in the lower range of the database. Its nearest rivals confirm this positioning: it matches the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and Intel Arc Graphics 64EU with identical average scores of 733 points and a delta of 0 percent. It is 1.4 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 6470M, which scores 723 points, and 2.4 percent behind the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M, which scores 751 points. These narrow margins place the Intel part in the entry-level segment, competing with older mobile and low-end discrete parts.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX shows a percentile rank of 50 against all GPUs, placing it at the midpoint of the database distribution. With no benchmark entries, the database does not provide a positional comparison to specific rivals. The absence of measured data means the LX MAX cannot be assigned wins in any recorded test, and its rank of 50 is not supported by any direct score. The Intel part, by contrast, has a measurable result that places it clearly among low-scoring GPUs. The use-case split is therefore lopsided: the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU wins the only recorded comparison because it has a score, while the LX MAX offers no comparable measurement.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a straightforward verdict. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU is a low-power integrated GPU with a confirmed benchmark score of 733 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it at the 3rd percentile. It matches the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and 64EU exactly, edges out the AMD Radeon HD 6470M by 1.4 percent, and trails the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M by 2.4 percent. These results indicate a part intended for basic graphics workloads where an integrated solution is sufficient.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX presents a different profile. It is a discrete card with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, and it draws 225 W with a 550 W suggested power supply. Its compute specifications are far larger than the Intel part: 6144 shading units against 192, 192 TMUs against 12, and 96 ROPs against 6. The FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS compared to 768.0 GFLOPS. Yet the database holds no benchmark scores for this card, and its percentile of 50 lacks supporting measurements. The verdict from the data is that the Intel part is the only one with a validated performance result. The LX MAX cannot be selected on measured performance grounds, only on its listed specifications.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark list is empty in the recorded data. No test pits the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU directly against the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. The only available score is the Intel part's 733 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. That score is identical to the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and 64EU, which also record 733 points. The AMD Radeon HD 6470M trails at 723 points, giving the Intel part a 1.4 percent advantage. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M leads at 751 points, putting the Intel part 2.4 percent behind. These deltas quantify the Intel GPU's position among its nearest rivals, but they say nothing about the LX MAX.

The specification gap between the two parts is enormous, yet it cannot be translated into a benchmark delta without measured data. The Intel part renders at 12.00 GPixel/s and 24.00 GTexel/s, while the LX MAX lists 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance differs by a factor of roughly 32 based on the recorded figures: 768.0 GFLOPS against 24.58 TFLOPS. Memory bandwidth is likewise incomparable: the Intel iGPU uses system shared memory with bandwidth described as system dependent, while the LX MAX has dedicated 432.0 GB/s. The largest wins in either direction cannot be assigned because the database records no direct comparison. The Intel part wins the only numerical benchmark present; the LX MAX wins no recorded test.

FAQ

Q: What is the only recorded benchmark score for the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU scores 733 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark entries for the Lisuan Tech LX MAX, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: How does the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It matches the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and 64EU with identical 733 point scores and a 0 percent delta. It is 1.4 percent ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 6470M and 2.4 percent behind the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M.

Q: What memory configuration does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX use?

A: The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 2250 MHz, listed as 18 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two parts?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU has a TDP of 65 W, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W.

Q: Which part has a higher percentile rank in the database?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX holds the 50th percentile against all GPUs, while the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU holds the 3rd percentile.

Architecture Differences

The two parts use different architectures, different chips, and different manufacturing processes. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU is built on the Arrow Lake-S chip with the Xe-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics (Arrow Lake) generation. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 73.3M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip with the TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. Its transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown.

The Intel part is an integrated GPU with a ring bus interface, system shared memory, and motherboard-dependent display outputs. The LX MAX is a discrete dual-slot card with a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, and a 1x 16-pin power connector. The LX MAX lists dimensions of 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width, while the Intel part has no recorded dimensions. The Intel GPU has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz; the LX MAX has no recorded base or boost clocks.

Compute resources differ sharply. The Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 6 ROPs. The LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Neither part lists ray tracing or tensor cores. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3. The Intel part is an IGP with a slot width of IGP, while the LX MAX is dual-slot with a 225 W TDP and a suggested 550 W power supply.

Specification Differences

The specification differences between the two parts are extensive. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU uses a 3 nm process, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses a 6 nm process, both at TSMC. The Intel part integrates 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die; the LX MAX lists unknown transistor and die figures. Clocks differ: the Intel part records base and boost clocks of 300 MHz and 2000 MHz, while the LX MAX records no base or boost clock but lists a memory clock of 2250 MHz at 18 Gbps effective.

Memory configurations are entirely different. The Intel part uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth, and its memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as system shared. The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 6 ROPs; the LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Pixel rate is 12.00 GPixel/s for the Intel part and 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX MAX. Texture rate is 24.00 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 is 768.0 GFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 1.536 TFLOPS versus 49.15 TFLOPS, both at a 2:1 ratio.

Power and physical specifications differ as well. The Intel part has a 65 W TDP, no power connectors, and an IGP slot width. The LX MAX has a 225 W TDP, a 1x 16-pin power connector, a suggested 550 W power supply, and a dual-slot width. Bus interfaces differ: ring bus for the Intel part, PCIe 4.0 x16 for the LX MAX. Display outputs are motherboard dependent for the Intel part, while the LX MAX provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The LX MAX measures 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm; the Intel part has no dimensions recorded. API support differs only in Vulkan version: 1.4 for Intel, 1.3 for the LX MAX. Release dates are 2024-10-23 for the Intel part and 2026-03-16 for the LX MAX. The Intel part lists a predecessor of HD Graphics and a production status of active; the LX MAX lists no predecessor and is also active.