Intel Arc Graphics 24EU

Intel Arc Graphics 24EU is an integrated graphics solution built on the Xe-LPG architecture, manufactured on a 3 nm process at TSMC. It is part of the Arrow Lake-S generation of HD Graphics, featuring 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 6 raster output units. The chip operates at a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2000 MHz. This is a low-power IGP solution designed for basic display output and light graphical tasks, not for high-end gaming.

Benchmark Performance

The benchmark data for the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU shows no recorded scores in the database, with an average benchmark score of 0. Its percentile ranking stands at 50, placing it in the middle of the distribution of all GPUs tracked, though this is a percentile based on the absence of performance data rather than measured results. The lack of any benchmark entries means there are no compute scores—such as FP32 or FP16—to compare directly against other products in the database.

Without nearest rivals listed, the data provides no relative performance deltas to reference. The FP32 output is rated at 768.0 GFLOPS, while FP16 performance reaches 1.536 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. These figures are theoretical peak calculations, not derived from real-world testing. The pixel rate is 12.00 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 24.00 GTexel/s. In practical terms, these numbers indicate a part capable of driving a desktop interface and decoding video, but not one suited for 3D rendering at playable frame rates.

The absence of benchmark scores suggests this IGP is not intended for gaming or GPU-accelerated compute workloads. Its performance class, if it were measured, would likely fall far below any discrete graphics card. The 50th percentile ranking is a statistical placeholder, not an endorsement of capability. For tasks like office productivity, web browsing, or media playback, the 24EU should handle basic acceleration, but any workload that stresses the GPU will bottleneck quickly.

Memory Subsystem

The memory configuration for the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU is entirely system-shared. There is no dedicated VRAM; instead, the GPU uses the host system’s memory, with the size, type, and bus width all listed as "System Shared." Memory bandwidth is similarly "System Dependent," meaning performance will vary based on the system’s memory configuration—dual-channel versus single-channel, DDR4 versus DDR5, and the speed of the installed RAM.

This shared memory architecture has significant implications for high-resolution workloads. At 1080p or higher, the GPU must compete with the CPU for memory bandwidth, which reduces effective performance. The lack of a dedicated bus width figure confirms that the memory interface is not fixed; it relies on the system’s memory controller. In practice, this means the 24EU is unsuitable for gaming at 1440p or 4K, where texture and frame buffer demands would exceed what a shared memory setup can efficiently provide.

The bandwidth being system-dependent also means that users with high-speed, dual-channel memory will see better performance than those with a single stick of slower RAM. However, even in the best case, the memory subsystem is a bottleneck for any serious graphical work. The IGP is designed for low-overhead tasks, and the shared memory design keeps costs and power down but limits performance headroom. For video playback or basic 2D acceleration, this is adequate, but for 3D rendering, the memory subsystem will not deliver consistent frame rates.

Who Should Consider It

This is an integrated graphics processor, not a discrete card, so it is best suited for users building a basic desktop system where discrete graphics are unnecessary. The 65 W TDP and IGP slot width indicate it is soldered onto the motherboard or CPU package, making it ideal for office PCs, home theater setups, or budget builds focused on productivity. The display outputs are motherboard-dependent, so the user must rely on the motherboard’s video ports, which typically support standard monitors at 1080p.

The 768.0 GFLOPS FP32 performance is sufficient for running a desktop environment, streaming video, and handling light photo editing. It is not suitable for modern 3D games, even at low settings and 720p resolution, due to the low shading unit count and shared memory bandwidth. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 API support mean it can technically run modern graphics APIs, but the hardware will struggle to maintain playable frame rates.

For users who need a system for web browsing, document editing, or media consumption, the 24EU is a capable choice. It also supports hardware acceleration for video playback, which offloads work from the CPU. However, anyone considering this for gaming, 3D modeling, or GPU-accelerated rendering should look elsewhere. The lack of benchmark scores and the absence of nearest rivals in the data reinforce that this is not a performance-oriented part.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum boost clock speed?

A: The boost clock is rated at 2000 MHz, with a base clock of 300 MHz.

Q: How much video memory does this GPU have?

A: The memory size is "System Shared," meaning it uses the host system’s RAM rather than dedicated VRAM.

Q: Does it support hardware ray tracing?

A: No, the data lists no ray tracing cores, so hardware ray tracing is not supported.

Q: What is the power consumption?

A: The TDP is 65 W, which is typical for an integrated graphics solution.

Q: Which APIs are supported?

A: It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Is this GPU suitable for gaming?

A: No, given the lack of benchmark scores and the low FP32 throughput of 768.0 GFLOPS, it is not designed for gaming.

How It Compares

The database lists no nearest rivals for the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU, which means there are no direct comparison points available. This is consistent with its status as a low-end integrated GPU, as it occupies a niche with few direct competitors in the same architecture and power class. Without rival scores or delta percentages, it is impossible to state how it performs relative to other IGPs or entry-level discrete cards.

The absence of comparison data suggests that the 24EU is not a product that enthusiasts or gamers would cross-shop. Its role is functional rather than competitive. In the broader market, integrated graphics from other manufacturers exist, but the FACT PACK provides no specific names or scores to reference. Therefore, any comparative analysis is limited to the theoretical specifications provided.

Given the 50th percentile ranking, one might assume it sits mid-pack, but this is a default value, not a measured outcome. The user should treat the 24EU as a baseline solution, not a performance leader.

Power and Cooling

The thermal design power is 65 W, which is low and suitable for passive or basic air cooling solutions. As an IGP, it requires no dedicated power connectors, as the slot width is listed as "IGP" and power connectors are null. The suggested PSU is also not specified, indicating that this GPU draws power from the motherboard’s standard power delivery, which is part of the CPU package.

The 65 W TDP is shared with the CPU in many integrated designs, so the actual power draw of the graphics portion may be lower. No cooling solution is specified beyond the IGP form factor, but a standard CPU cooler with a fan or a low-profile heatsink should suffice. The 3 nm process node contributes to efficiency, keeping heat output manageable. The lack of a power connector means installation is straightforward, with no additional cabling required.

For system builders, this means no extra power supply headroom is needed beyond what the CPU requires. The motherboard must provide adequate VRM cooling, but the 24EU itself is not a thermal concern. Its production status is active, so it is currently available in systems, and the release date of 2024-10-23 indicates it is a recent addition to the market. The 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die show a dense design, but the graphics portion is a minor part of the overall chip.