Intel Arc Graphics 24EU vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU and the Intel Arc Pro B370. The database lists no shared test entries, no comparative scores, and no win counts for either part in a direct matchup. This absence is significant: any performance comparison must therefore be inferred from the individual benchmark and specification records available for each product.

For the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU, the database records a single benchmark result: a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 733. This places the part at the 3rd percentile of all GPUs in the database, meaning 97 percent of recorded GPUs score higher. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU, both with an identical average score of 733 and a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Radeon HD 6470M trails at 723, which is 1.4 percent behind. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M leads these close competitors at 751, putting it 2.4 percent ahead of the 24EU.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 has no benchmark scores recorded in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and it has no nearest rivals. However, its percentile rating sits at 50, which is far above the 24EU's 3rd percentile. This percentile gap suggests that the B370 is expected to outperform the 24EU by a substantial margin, but no measured score exists in the database to quantify that gap directly.

The lack of head-to-head data means the performance relationship between these two parts cannot be stated in exact delta percentages from direct testing. What can be stated from the database is that the 24EU scores 733 in one DX12 test, places at the 3rd percentile, and sits within 2.4 percent of several older discrete mobile GPUs. The B370, by contrast, has no recorded score but carries a 50th percentile rating, indicating mid-pack positioning among all recorded GPUs rather than near-bottom placement.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU uses the Xe-LPG architecture on the Arrow Lake-S chip, fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the newer Xe3-LPG architecture on the Panther Lake chip, also on a 3 nm process but fabricated at Intel. Both parts therefore share a process node, but they come from different foundries and different architecture generations. The 24EU belongs to the Arc Graphics (Arrow Lake) generation, while the B370 belongs to the Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) generation.

The 24EU integrates 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 6 render output units. The B370 scales this up substantially: 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs. That is roughly 6.7 times the shading units, 3.3 times the TMUs, and 3.3 times the ROPs. The B370 also includes 10 ray tracing cores, while the 24EU lists no ray tracing cores in the database. Neither part lists tensor cores.

The transistor counts differ sharply. The 24EU uses 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 73.3 million per square millimeter. The B370 lists transistors, die size, and transistor density as unknown or null in the database. This prevents any direct comparison of transistor budgets or die efficiency between the two.

Clock behavior also differs. Both parts have a base clock of 300 MHz. The 24EU boosts to 2000 MHz, while the B370 boosts to 2400 MHz, a 400 MHz advantage. Both use system shared memory with a system shared bus width, and both report memory bandwidth as system dependent. Neither has a dedicated memory interface.

Compute throughput numbers reflect the architectural gap. The 24EU delivers 768.0 GFLOPS FP32 and 1.536 TFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. The B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16, also at a 2:1 ratio. That is exactly 8 times the FP32 throughput and 8 times the FP16 throughput in the recorded specifications. Pixel rate scales from 12.00 GPixel/s on the 24EU to 48.00 GPixel/s on the B370, a 4 times difference. Texture rate scales from 24.00 GTexel/s to 96.00 GTexel/s, also 4 times.

Power draw moves in the opposite direction. The 24EU has a TDP of 65 W, while the B370 has a TDP of 25 W. The B370 delivers 8 times the FP32 throughput at less than half the power envelope, per the recorded specifications. The B370 also lists no power connectors, while the 24EU has no power connector entry at all.

Both parts report the same API support: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both use an IGP slot width. The 24EU uses a ring bus interface, while the B370 uses an IGP bus interface. Display outputs differ: the 24EU is motherboard dependent, and the B370 is portable device dependent. Both list no launch MSRP in the database.

The release dates are far apart. The 24EU came out on 2024-10-23, and the B370 on 2026-01-26. The 24EU lists HD Graphics as its predecessor, while the B370 lists HD Graphics-WM. Both are marked as active production status.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 boosts to 2400 MHz, while the Intel Arc Graphics 24EU boosts to 2000 MHz. Both share a 300 MHz base clock.

Q: How much faster is the B370 in FP32 compute?

A: The B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32, exactly 8 times the 768.0 GFLOPS of the 24EU.

Q: Does the B370 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the B370 includes 10 ray tracing cores. The 24EU lists no ray tracing cores in the database.

Q: Which part consumes less power?

A: The B370 has a TDP of 25 W, compared to 65 W for the 24EU.

Q: Do these GPUs use dedicated video memory?

A: No. Both use system shared memory, with system shared bus width and system dependent bandwidth.

Q: Are they fabricated on the same process node?

A: Yes, both are on a 3 nm process, but the 24EU is made at TSMC while the B370 is made at Intel.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc Graphics 24EU | Intel Arc Pro B370 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Xe-LPG | Xe3-LPG |

| Chip | Arrow Lake-S | Panther Lake |

| Generation | Arc Graphics (Arrow Lake) | Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake) |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 17,800 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 243 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 73.3M / mm² | null |

| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | 2400 MHz |

| Shading Units | 192 | 1280 |

| TMUs | 12 | 40 |

| ROPs | 6 | 20 |

| RT Cores | null | 10 |

| Pixel Rate | 12.00 GPixel/s | 48.00 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 24.00 GTexel/s | 96.00 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 768.0 GFLOPS | 6.144 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 1.536 TFLOPS (2:1) | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 65 W | 25 W |

| Power Connectors | null | None |

| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | IGP |

| Display Outputs | Motherboard Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |

| Release Date | 2024-10-23 | 2026-01-26 |

| Predecessor | HD Graphics | HD Graphics-WM |

| Avg Benchmark Score | 733 | 0 |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 3 | 50 |

Fields that match between the two include process node (3 nm), base clock (300 MHz), memory size/type/bus width (system shared), memory bandwidth (system dependent), API support (DirectX 12 Ultimate 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4), slot width (IGP), and production status (Active). Neither part has a launch MSRP recorded.

The Verdict

The database positions these two parts in entirely different performance tiers. The Intel Arc Graphics 24EU records a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 733, placing it at the 3rd percentile of all GPUs and within 2.4 percent of older discrete mobile parts like the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M. It is a low-end integrated solution for Arrow Lake-S desktop systems, built on Xe-LPG, with 192 shading units and a 65 W TDP.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 carries no measured benchmark score, but its 50th percentile rating places it near the middle of the database rather than at the bottom. Its specification sheet supports that positioning: 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, 10 ray tracing cores, 6.144 TFLOPS FP32, and a 2400 MHz boost clock. It achieves this at 25 W, which is less than half the TDP of the 24EU.

For a user choosing between these two based strictly on the recorded data, the B370 is the stronger compute part by a wide margin in raw throughput, while consuming less power. It is also the newer design, released on 2026-01-26 versus 2024-10-23, and uses the newer Xe3-LPG architecture. The 24EU has the advantage of having an actual measured benchmark score in the database, which the B370 lacks, but that score is a low-end result with close rivals all within a few percent.

The 24EU suits systems where the integrated GPU is incidental and the surrounding platform handles most of the workload. Its 3rd percentile standing shows it is near the bottom of the database's GPU distribution. The B370, by contrast, is positioned as a mid-pack part at the 50th percentile, with a specification profile that indicates far higher throughput per watt. The choice between them comes down to whether the platform requires an Arrow Lake-S integrated part or a Panther Lake integrated part, since the data shows the B370 is overwhelmingly stronger in every compute metric recorded.