Intel Arc B580 vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Arc B580 compare to the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc B580 has an average benchmark score of 23021, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores, resulting in an average of 0.

Q: What is the difference in shading unit count between the two GPUs?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, while the Intel Arc B580 has 2560 shading units, meaning the LX 7G100 carries more than double the shading units.

Q: Which GPU offers higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel Arc B580 delivers 13.67 TFLOPS, a difference of roughly 10.91 TFLOPS in favor of the LX 7G100.

Q: Do both GPUs have the same memory size and type?

A: Yes, both the Intel Arc B580 and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 use 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, though the B580 has slightly higher memory bandwidth at 456.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s for the LX 7G100.

Q: What is the process node for each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc B580 is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses a 6 nm process, also at TSMC.

Q: Which GPU has a higher TDP and what is the suggested PSU requirement?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W, while the Intel Arc B580 has a TDP of 190 W and a suggested PSU of 450 W.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc B580 holds the advantage in every recorded benchmark category, since the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no benchmark entries in the database. The B580 shows its strongest results in synthetic DirectX workloads. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 3068. The PassMark suite shows a G3D score of 15748, a GPU compute score of 7729, and DirectX 11 performance at 128. Its OpenCL result in Geekbench reaches 92821, while the Vulkan score climbs to 109672. These figures place the Arc B580 at the 68th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23021.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark results. The database shows a 50th percentile ranking, but this figure is not supported by any actual test scores. The GPU's architectural specifications indicate strong theoretical capabilities, particularly in shading units, texture units, and FP32 throughput, but without benchmark data, no performance wins can be assigned to it.

Where the LX 7G100 does win is in raw specification counts. It has 6144 shading units versus 2560, 192 texture mapping units versus 160, and 96 render output units versus 80. Its FP32 output of 24.58 TFLOPS is nearly double the Arc B580's 13.67 TFLOPS. The LX 7G100 also uses a wider PCIe bus interface at x16 compared to x8 on the Arc B580. These specification advantages, however, do not translate into recorded benchmark wins because the data does not contain any test results for the LX 7G100.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture with the BMG-G21 chip, part of the Battlemage generation within the Arc 5 lineup. It uses a 5 nm process at TSMC with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 72.1 million per square millimeter. The chip includes 20 dedicated ray tracing cores. The B580's predecessor is the Alchemist architecture, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the TrueGPU architecture with the 7G106 chip, belonging to the 7G100 generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but the database records no transistor count, die size, or transistor density for this chip. The LX 7G100 has no recorded ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. Its API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3, with the Vulkan version being slightly older than the Arc B580's 1.4.

The two GPUs differ fundamentally in their rendering approach. The Arc B580 integrates ray tracing hardware, while the LX 7G100's architecture does not list any ray tracing cores. The LX 7G100 compensates with a much larger shading unit count, suggesting a design focused on conventional rasterization throughput rather than hybrid ray tracing features. The Arc B580's smaller transistor count of 19,600 million on a denser 5 nm process contrasts with the LX 7G100's unknown transistor budget on the looser 6 nm node.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every major specification field. The Intel Arc B580 has a base and boost clock of 2670 MHz, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no recorded base or boost clock values. Memory clocks differ slightly: the B580 runs at 2375 MHz with 19 Gbps effective, while the LX 7G100 runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. Memory bandwidth favors the B580 at 456.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s for the LX 7G100.

Shading units, TMUs, and ROPs all favor the LX 7G100. The B580 has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, while the LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. Pixel rate goes to the B580 at 213.6 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX 7G100. Texture rate also favors the B580 at 427.2 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX 7G100. FP32 and FP16 compute both favor the LX 7G100: 24.58 TFLOPS versus 13.67 TFLOPS in FP32, and 49.15 TFLOPS versus 27.34 TFLOPS in FP16.

The TDP difference is 190 W for the B580 and 225 W for the LX 7G100, with suggested PSU ratings of 450 W and 550 W respectively. Both cards are dual-slot and use a single 8-pin power connector. The B580 uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs differ: the B580 provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while the LX 7G100 provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. Physical dimensions favor the B580, which is shorter at 272 mm versus 294 mm, narrower at 115 mm versus 120 mm, and thinner at 45 mm versus 49 mm. The B580 has a launch MSRP of 249 USD, while the LX 7G100 has no recorded launch MSRP. The B580 was released on 2024-12-12, while the LX 7G100's release date is 2026-06-17.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two GPUs, and the LX 7G100 has no individual benchmark scores. This means every comparison must rely on the Arc B580's recorded results and the LX 7G100's theoretical specifications.

The Arc B580's strongest recorded result relative to its rivals comes from its average benchmark score of 23021. Against the nearest rivals in the database, the B580 sits within 1% of all four comparators. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP by 0.2% (23061 versus 23021), leads the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 by 0.6% (22895 versus 23021), trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 by 0.7% (23172 versus 23021), and trails the NVIDIA P106-100 by 1% (23249 versus 23021). This grouping places the Arc B580 in a tight performance band around the RTX 2080 and RTX 3080, despite those cards belonging to older generations.

The LX 7G100 cannot be placed in this comparison because it has no benchmark scores and no nearest rivals in the database. Its percentile ranking of 50 is a neutral midpoint, but no measured data supports it. The Arc B580's 68th percentile ranking, by contrast, is anchored by ten separate benchmark entries spanning DirectX 9 through DirectX 12, OpenCL, Vulkan, and compute workloads.

In the absence of direct head-to-head data, the FP32 compute gap is the clearest numerical distinction. The LX 7G100's 24.58 TFLOPS is 80% higher than the Arc B580's 13.67 TFLOPS. The texture rate, however, reverses this trend: the B580's 427.2 GTexel/s is 11% higher than the LX 7G100's 384.0 GTexel/s. Pixel rate also favors the B580 by 11%. These conflicting figures suggest the LX 7G100 is designed for compute-heavy workloads, while the Arc B580 may be more balanced for graphics rasterization.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports only one conclusion: the Intel Arc B580 is the only GPU in this comparison with measurable benchmark performance. Its average score of 23021 places it within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, and NVIDIA P106-100, and its 68th percentile ranking across all GPUs confirms that it performs at a solid mid-to-high tier level. The B580's 12 GB GDDR6 memory, 456.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 2670 MHz clocks provide a complete, active product with a launch MSRP of 249 USD.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 presents a specification sheet that appears strong on paper. Its 6144 shading units, 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, and 192 TMUs substantially exceed the Arc B580's counts. Its 12 GB GDDR6 memory matches the B580, and its PCIe 4.0 x16 interface doubles the B580's x8 lane width. Yet the database contains zero benchmark results for this card, no nearest rivals, and no head-to-head entries. A 50th percentile ranking without supporting test data cannot be validated.

For buyers choosing between these two based solely on the database, the Arc B580 is the only option with evidence of real-world performance. The LX 7G100's specifications suggest it could outperform the B580 in compute-heavy tasks, but no recorded data confirms this. The B580 also offers a wider API set with Vulkan 1.4 versus 1.3, more modern display outputs with HDMI 2.1a and DisplayPort 2.1, and a smaller physical footprint. The LX 7G100's higher TDP of 225 W and suggested PSU of 550 W require more system power, while the B580 operates at 190 W with a 450 W suggested PSU.

The data does not show any benchmark wins for the LX 7G100 because no benchmarks exist for it. The Arc B580 wins every measured category by default. The LX 7G100 may eventually prove competitive if benchmark results are recorded, but as the database stands, the Intel Arc B580 is the only card with verified performance.