AMD Radeon RX 9070 vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 and Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile occupy completely different performance tiers. The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between the two, and the Intel part has no recorded benchmark scores at all. Its average benchmark score is 0, placing it at the 50th percentile of all GPUs, while the RX 9070 holds a 69th percentile ranking with an average benchmark score of 23,877.

The RX 9070 delivers 36.13 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile delivers 384.0 GFLOPS. That is a 94-fold difference in raw floating-point throughput. The pixel rate tells a similar story: 322.6 GPixel/s for the AMD part versus 4.000 GPixel/s for the Intel part, an 80.65x gap. Texture rate sits at 564.5 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s, a 47.04x difference.

In the RX 9070's recorded benchmarks, its strongest single result is Geekbench OpenCL at 131,539 points. Its Vulkan score reaches 58,705. PassMark G3D shows 25,381 points, while PassMark GPU Compute records 14,737. The DirectX legacy tests are much lower: DirectX 9 scores 343, DirectX 11 scores 281, DirectX 10 scores 141, and DirectX 12 scores 74. PassMark G2D (2D graphics) reaches 1,280.

The Intel part has no benchmark entries in the database, so direct numerical comparison relies entirely on the specification-derived rates above. The RX 9070's nearest rivals in the database are all discrete desktop and high-end mobile parts: the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z with an average score of 23,736 (0.6% behind), the AMD Radeon RX 6800S at 24,063 (0.8% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile at 23,628 (1.1% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER at 24,170 (1.2% ahead). The RX 9070 sits within a tight 2% band around these four, indicating that its average score places it squarely among previous-generation flagship-class parts. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no nearest rivals listed, reflecting its lack of recorded data.

The absence of head-to-head results and the Intel part's zero benchmark average mean that any comparison must lean on the architectural and specification deltas. The RX 9070's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus delivers 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part uses System Shared memory with System Dependent bandwidth, which in practice scales with the host platform's memory configuration. The AMD card's memory clock runs at 2518 MHz, 20.1 Gbps effective. The Intel part's memory clock is simply listed as System Shared.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 9070 wins in every measurable compute and graphics category. Its FP32 throughput of 36.13 TFLOPS targets high-resolution gaming and compute workloads. The 16 GB GDDR6 frame buffer with 644.6 GB/s bandwidth supports large textures and heavy data sets. The pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 564.5 GTexel/s indicate strong rasterization throughput for modern game engines.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins in power envelope and integration. Its 6 W TDP versus the RX 9070's 220 W TDP represents a 36.67x power difference. The Intel part is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) using a Ring Bus interface, so it requires no power connectors and no suggested PSU rating. The RX 9070 needs 2x 8-pin power connectors and a 550 W suggested PSU. The Intel part's display outputs are Portable Device Dependent, indicating it serves thin-and-light mobile systems where the RX 9070's dual-slot, 2x 8-pin discrete card format cannot apply.

In practical terms, the RX 9070's wins are all performance-oriented: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support, RT cores (56 of them), a 4 nm process, and 53,900 million transistors. The Intel part's wins are all efficiency-oriented: 6 W power draw, IGP form factor, and no external power requirement. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1), one feature level below the RX 9070's 12_2. Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Architecture Differences

The RX 9070 uses the Navi 48 chip built on RDNA 4.0 architecture, part of the Navi IV (RX 9000) generation. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die. Transistor density calculates to 151.0M per mm². The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Twin Lake chip with Xe-LP architecture, part of the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. Its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown.

The RX 9070 has 3,584 shading units, 224 TMUs, and 128 ROPs. It also includes 56 RT cores. The Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs. It has no RT cores listed. The shading unit ratio is 18.67x in favor of AMD. The TMU ratio is 18.67x. The ROP ratio is 32x.

Clock behavior differs substantially. The RX 9070 has a base clock of 1330 MHz, a game clock of 2070 MHz, and a boost clock of 2520 MHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz. The Intel part has no game clock listed. The boost clock ratio is 2.52x in favor of AMD.

FP16 throughput shows a different ratio pattern. The RX 9070 delivers 36.13 TFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio to FP32. The Intel part delivers 768.0 GFLOPS FP16 at a 2:1 ratio. This means the Intel architecture processes FP16 at twice its FP32 rate, while the AMD architecture processes both at the same rate. The RX 9070's FP16 is 47.04x higher in absolute terms.

Memory architecture diverges completely. The RX 9070 uses dedicated 16 GB GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus. The Intel part uses System Shared memory with System Dependent bandwidth. The RX 9070 has a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface. The Intel part uses a Ring Bus.

The RX 9070's release date is recorded as 2025-03-05, while the Intel part's release date is 2024-12-31. Both are marked as Active in production status. The RX 9070 lists its predecessor as Navi III and its launch MSRP as 549 USD. The Intel part lists no predecessor and no launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the AMD Radeon RX 9070 than the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile in FP32 compute?

A: The RX 9070 delivers 36.13 TFLOPS of FP32, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile delivers 384.0 GFLOPS. That is a 94.09x difference in raw FP32 throughput.

Q: Does the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile support ray tracing?

A: The Intel part has no RT cores listed in the database. The RX 9070 includes 56 RT cores. The Intel part's API support includes DirectX 12 (12_1), which does not require dedicated RT hardware.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The RX 9070 uses 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 644.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses System Shared memory with System Dependent bandwidth and a System Shared bus width.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The RX 9070 has a 220 W TDP, requires 2x 8-pin power connectors, and lists a 550 W suggested PSU. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a 6 W TDP, requires no power connectors, and lists no suggested PSU.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two GPUs?

A: The RX 9070 is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: Where does the RX 9070 rank against its nearest rivals in the database?

A: Its average benchmark score of 23,877 places it 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z, 1.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile, 0.8% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6800S, and 1.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 9070 | Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | Xe-LP |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 53,900 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 357 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 151.0M / mm² | null |

| Base Clock | 1330 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz | 1000 MHz |

| Game Clock | 2070 MHz | null |

| Memory Clock | 2518 MHz, 20.1 Gbps effective | System Shared |

| Memory Size | 16 GB | System Shared |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | System Shared |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | System Shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 644.6 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading Units | 3584 | 192 |

| TMUs | 224 | 12 |

| ROPs | 128 | 4 |

| RT Cores | 56 | null |

| Pixel Rate | 322.6 GPixel/s | 4.000 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 564.5 GTexel/s | 12.00 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 36.13 TFLOPS | 384.0 GFLOPS |

| FP16 | 36.13 TFLOPS (1:1) | 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 220 W | 6 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin | null |

| Suggested PSU | 550 W | null |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | Ring Bus |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a | Portable Device Dependent |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |

| Release Date | 2025-03-05 | 2024-12-31 |

| Launch MSRP | 549 USD | null |

The Verdict

The data indicates a total performance separation. The RX 9070's 36.13 TFLOPS FP32, 644.6 GB/s bandwidth, and 56 RT cores place it in the discrete desktop class, with an average benchmark score of 23,877 that sits within 1.2% of the RTX 2080 SUPER and RX 6800S. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile's 384.0 GFLOPS FP32, 4 ROPs, and System Shared memory mark it as an integrated solution for portable devices, with no recorded benchmarks and a 50th percentile standing based on absence of data.

The RX 9070 is the only option for demanding graphics workloads. Its DirectX 12 Ultimate support, 16 GB GDDR6 frame buffer, and 2520 MHz boost clock serve high-end gaming and compute tasks. Its 220 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU define its installation requirements. The Intel part's 6 W TDP and IGP form factor define a completely different use case: low-power mobile systems where the Ring Bus interface and System Shared memory eliminate the need for discrete memory or power delivery.

The choice between them is not competitive but categorical. A system requiring the RX 9070's capabilities cannot use the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, and a portable device with the Intel part's power envelope cannot accommodate the RX 9070's dual-slot, 2x 8-pin power connector design. The RX 9070 targets users who need 36.13 TFLOPS of compute and 64.46 GB/s-class bandwidth (specifically 644.6 GB/s). The Intel part targets users who need basic display output with 6 W power consumption. The 47.04x FP16 gap and 32x ROP gap confirm that these products do not overlap in any meaningful performance segment.