AMD Radeon RX 7600S vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

# FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7600S compare to the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600S has an average benchmark score of 16696, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has an average benchmark score of 0, meaning no recorded benchmark data exists for the Intel part. The AMD GPU sits at the 60th percentile of all GPUs, while the Intel GPU sits at the 50th percentile.

Q: What are the closest performance rivals to the AMD Radeon RX 7600S?

A: The nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA T400 4 GB with an average score of 16792 and a delta of -0.6%, the NVIDIA T400 with an average score of 16508 and a delta of +1.1%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 with an average score of 16504 and a delta of +1.2%, and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 with an average score of 16932 and a delta of -1.4%.

Q: What architectural differences exist between the two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600S uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture on a 6 nm process from TSMC with the Navi 33 chip, featuring 1792 shading units, 28 ray tracing cores, and 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Xe-LP architecture on a 10 nm process from Intel with the Twin Lake chip, featuring 192 shading units, no ray tracing cores, and system shared memory.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600S has a TDP of 75 W, whereas the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W. This represents a substantial difference in power requirements, with the Intel part drawing considerably less power.

Q: Which GPU supports higher DirectX features?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600S supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Are there any head-to-head benchmark results between the two GPUs?

A: No, the database contains no head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 7600S and the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. The AMD GPU has ten individual benchmark scores recorded, while the Intel GPU has none.

# Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7600S and Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile represent fundamentally different design philosophies and market positions. The AMD part belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It uses a 6 nm process from TSMC, containing 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million transistors per square millimeter. The Intel part uses the Xe-LP architecture with the Twin Lake chip, manufactured on a 10 nm process from Intel, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown.

The compute configuration differs radically. The AMD GPU features 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 raster operation units, and 28 ray tracing cores. The Intel GPU has 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 4 raster operation units, with no ray tracing cores at all. This represents a 9.3x difference in shading units and a 9.3x difference in texture mapping units. The AMD part's ray tracing capability is entirely absent from the Intel part.

Memory architecture also separates these two. The Radeon RX 7600S uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory, with bus width and bandwidth described as system dependent. The AMD GPU operates with a base clock of 1500 MHz, a boost clock of 2200 MHz, and a game clock of 1865 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz, with no game clock specified.

The feature set extends to API support. The AMD GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel GPU supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface differs as well: the AMD part uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Intel part uses a Ring Bus. Both are integrated-class parts with the slot width listed as IGP, and both have display outputs that are portable device dependent.

# The Verdict

The data shows a clear performance hierarchy between these two GPUs. The AMD Radeon RX 7600S delivers an average benchmark score of 16696, placing it at the 60th percentile of all GPUs. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores, an average score of 0, and sits at the 50th percentile. The AMD part is positioned among discrete mobile GPUs, with its nearest rivals including the NVIDIA T400 4 GB, NVIDIA T400, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2, and NVIDIA Tesla M4, all within a delta range of -1.4% to +1.2%. This indicates that the RX 7600S competes in a narrow performance band around the 16500-16900 average score range.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, with its 6 W TDP, 192 shading units, and system shared memory, is designed for basic graphics duties in low-power mobile devices. Its pixel rate of 4.000 GPixel/s and texture rate of 12.00 GTexel/s, along with FP32 performance of 384.0 GFLOPS, place it in an entirely different performance class. The AMD Radeon RX 7600S delivers 140.8 GPixel/s, 246.4 GTexel/s, and 15.77 TFLOPS FP32, which are 35.2x, 20.5x, and 41.1x higher respectively.

For users requiring dedicated graphics performance with ray tracing support, 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, and DirectX 12 Ultimate features, the AMD Radeon RX 7600S is the appropriate choice. For ultra-low-power systems where basic display output and minimal 3D acceleration suffice, the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile fits that niche. The benchmark data does not provide any head-to-head results, so direct comparisons rely entirely on the individual benchmark scores recorded for the AMD part and the absence of benchmark data for the Intel part.

# Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field. The AMD Radeon RX 7600S belongs to the Radeon RX 7000 series from AMD, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no series designation. The AMD chip is Navi 33 with RDNA 3.0 architecture and the codename Hotpink Bonefish, in the Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) generation. The Intel chip is Twin Lake with Xe-LP architecture, no codename, in the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation.

Process technology differs: AMD uses 6 nm from TSMC, while Intel uses 10 nm from its own foundry. The AMD GPU has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die with a density of 65.2M per mm²; Intel's transistor count and die size are unknown. Clock speeds show the AMD part running at 1500 MHz base, 2200 MHz boost, and 1865 MHz game clock, with memory at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The Intel part runs at 300 MHz base and 1000 MHz boost, with no game clock and system shared memory.

Memory configurations are fundamentally different: 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth versus system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. Compute units differ: 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 RT cores versus 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, 4 ROPs, and no RT cores. Pixel rate is 140.8 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s; texture rate is 246.4 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s; FP32 is 15.77 TFLOPS versus 384.0 GFLOPS; FP16 is 31.54 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1).

Power and interface specifications also diverge. The AMD part has a 75 W TDP with no power connectors, while the Intel part has a 6 W TDP. The AMD GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, the Intel GPU uses Ring Bus. Both are listed as IGP slot width with portable device dependent display outputs. DirectX support differs: 12 Ultimate (12_2) versus 12 (12_1), with both supporting OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. Release dates show the AMD part launched on 2023-01-03, while the Intel part launched on 2024-12-31. The AMD GPU has a predecessor listed as Polaris Mobile; the Intel GPU has no predecessor.

# Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No head-to-head benchmark results exist in the database between the AMD Radeon RX 7600S and the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and both wins counters are zero. Consequently, the comparison must be drawn from the individual benchmark scores recorded for the AMD part and the absence of any benchmark data for the Intel part.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600S has ten recorded benchmark scores. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 1888. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 68012. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 73868. PassMark results include DirectX 10 with a score of 74, DirectX 11 with a score of 140, DirectX 12 with a score of 65, DirectX 9 with a score of 211, G2D with a score of 776, G3D with a score of 15408, and GPU compute with a score of 6520. The average benchmark score across these tests is 16696.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no benchmark scores recorded. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0. This means the database contains no performance measurements for the Intel part in any of the tested workloads.

Interpreting the relative performance requires examining the AMD part's position against its nearest rivals. The NVIDIA T400 4 GB scores 16792, which is 0.6% higher than the RX 7600S. The NVIDIA T400 scores 16508, which is 1.1% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16504, which is 1.2% lower. The NVIDIA Tesla M4 scores 16932, which is 1.4% higher. These narrow deltas indicate that the RX 7600S sits in a tightly contested performance tier, with all four rivals within 1.4% of its average score.

# Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600S demonstrates clear advantages across every measurable dimension in the database. Its 15.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance is 41.1x higher than the Intel part's 384.0 GFLOPS. The pixel rate of 140.8 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s represents a 35.2x advantage. The texture rate of 246.4 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s is a 20.5x advantage. The AMD GPU's 28 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, a capability entirely absent from the Intel part. The 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth versus system shared memory gives the AMD part a substantial memory performance edge. DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support on the AMD side exceeds the Intel part's DirectX 12 (12_1) support.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins on power efficiency. Its 6 W TDP is dramatically lower than the AMD part's 75 W TDP. For fanless or passively cooled ultra-portable devices, this power envelope is a decisive factor. The Intel part also has a newer release date of 2024-12-31 compared to the AMD part's 2023-01-03. The Intel GPU's Ring Bus interface may integrate more directly with certain low-power platform designs, though the database provides no performance data to confirm any practical impact.

The use-case split follows the specification differences. The AMD Radeon RX 7600S is suited for gaming and content creation workloads that require dedicated memory, high throughput, and ray tracing support. Its 60th percentile ranking and competitive positioning against the NVIDIA T400 series and GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 confirm it operates in a discrete-class performance tier. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is suited for basic display output, video playback, and lightweight 2D workloads in systems where the 6 W power budget is paramount. Its lack of recorded benchmark scores means the database cannot validate any specific performance claims for the Intel part, but its specification profile indicates it targets a fundamentally different market segment.