AMD Radeon RX 7600S vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a significant gap between the AMD Radeon RX 7600S and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104, though the comparison is limited by the fact that the NVIDIA card has no individual benchmark entries in the database. The AMD part, by contrast, has a full set of recorded measurements across multiple test suites.

Looking at the AMD Radeon RX 7600S data, the strongest result appears in Geekbench Vulkan, where it scores 73,868 points. Its Geekbench OpenCL result is 68,012 points, which confirms a solid compute workload capability. In Passmark testing, the G3D score is 15,408, while the G2D score is 776. The DirectX 11 result is 140, DirectX 9 is 211, DirectX 10 is 74, and DirectX 12 is 65. The GPU compute score in Passmark is 6,520. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test shows a score of 1,888.

The average benchmark score for the RX 7600S is 16,696. Its percentile ranking among all GPUs is 60, meaning it sits above the midpoint of the database distribution. The nearest rivals in the database provide useful context for interpreting this score. The NVIDIA T400 4 GB has an average score of 16,792, which is 0.6% higher than the RX 7600S. The NVIDIA T400 scores 16,508, putting it 1.1% below. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 also scores 16,504, again 1.1% lower. The NVIDIA Tesla M4 scores 16,932, which is 1.4% higher than the RX 7600S.

This tight clustering around the 16,500 to 17,000 range indicates that the RX 7600S sits in a competitive band where small differences separate adjacent products. The delta percentages are all within a narrow 2.5 percentage point spread, so the RX 7600S is effectively bracketed by these four NVIDIA parts. Its own score of 16,696 places it just below the T400 4 GB and the Tesla M4, while remaining ahead of the T400 and the RTX 5090 D V2.

For the RTX 4060 Ti AD104, the database contains no benchmark scores, no average score, and no nearest rivals. Its percentile ranking is recorded as 50, which places it at the median of all GPUs in the database, but without actual test results there is no measurement to compare directly against the RX 7600S. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win counts for each product are zero. This means the numerical comparison rests entirely on the RX 7600S measurements and the known specifications of the NVIDIA card.

The absence of RTX 4060 Ti AD104 benchmark data does not erase its specification advantages, which are substantial on paper. The FP32 throughput of the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is 22.06 TFLOPS, compared to 15.77 TFLOPS for the RX 7600S, a difference that indicates roughly 40% higher raw shader output for the NVIDIA part. The texture rate is 344.8 GTexel/s versus 246.4 GTexel/s, and the pixel rate is 121.7 GPixel/s versus 140.8 GPixel/s, meaning the AMD card actually leads in pixel fill rate despite the NVIDIA card having more shading units.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7600S compare to its closest rivals in the database?

A: The RX 7600S has an average benchmark score of 16,696. The NVIDIA T400 4 GB scores 16,792, which is 0.6% higher. The NVIDIA T400 scores 16,508, which is 1.1% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16,504, also 1.1% lower, and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 scores 16,932, which is 1.4% higher.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each product in the database?

A: The RX 7600S has a percentile ranking of 60 among all GPUs. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has a percentile ranking of 50.

Q: Does the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database contains an empty benchmark array for the RTX 4060 Ti AD104, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals. Its performance can only be assessed through its specifications.

Q: What memory configuration do both cards use?

A: Both use 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. The RX 7600S has a memory clock of 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed and bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has a memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed and bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s.

Q: Which card has more shading units and ray tracing cores?

A: The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has 4,352 shading units and 34 ray tracing cores. The RX 7600S has 1,792 shading units and 28 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA card also includes 136 tensor cores, while the AMD card has none listed.

Q: What are the power specifications for each card?

A: The RX 7600S has a TDP of 75 W, uses no power connectors, and is listed as an integrated graphics processor (IGP) form factor. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has a TDP of 160 W, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 450 W.

Architecture Differences

The two cards come from fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Radeon RX 7600S uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi Mobile generation within the RX 7000M series. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 uses the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD104 chip and belongs to the GeForce 40 generation.

The manufacturing process differs significantly. The RX 7600S is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a die size of 204 mm². The transistor density is 65.2 million per square millimeter. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is built on a 5 nm process, also at TSMC, with 35,800 million transistors on a die size of 294 mm². Its transistor density is 121.8 million per square millimeter, nearly double that of the AMD chip.

The compute architecture differs in how FP16 throughput is handled. The RX 7600S delivers 31.54 TFLOPS for FP16, which is a 2:1 ratio relative to its FP32 throughput of 15.77 TFLOPS. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 delivers 22.06 TFLOPS for FP16, which is a 1:1 ratio with its FP32 throughput of 22.06 TFLOPS. This means the AMD card has a dedicated advantage in half-precision compute, while the NVIDIA card treats FP16 and FP32 equally.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RX 7600S has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has 4,352 shading units, 136 texture mapping units, and 48 render output units. The NVIDIA card has 34 ray tracing cores and 136 tensor cores, while the AMD card has 28 ray tracing cores and no tensor core count listed.

The production status differs. The RX 7600S is listed as Active, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is listed as End-of-life. The release dates are also different, with the AMD card released on 2023-01-03 and the NVIDIA card released on 2024-03-31. The predecessor and successor relationships differ as well: the RX 7600S follows the Polaris Mobile generation and has no listed successor, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 follows the GeForce 30 series and is succeeded by the GeForce 50 series.

Specification Differences

The clock speeds show a clear separation. The RX 7600S has a base clock of 1500 MHz, a boost clock of 2200 MHz, and a game clock of 1865 MHz. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost clock of 2535 MHz, with no game clock listed. The NVIDIA card runs at higher frequencies across the board.

Memory bandwidth favors the NVIDIA card. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has 288.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 256.0 GB/s for the RX 7600S, a 12.5% advantage. Both use 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, but the NVIDIA card runs its memory at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, while the AMD card runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed.

The pixel rate is one area where the AMD card leads. The RX 7600S delivers 140.8 GPixel/s, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 delivers 121.7 GPixel/s. This is a 15.7% advantage for the AMD part, which is notable given that the NVIDIA card has more shading units and a higher texture rate. The texture rate, however, favors NVIDIA at 344.8 GTexel/s versus 246.4 GTexel/s, a 39.9% advantage.

The power requirements differ substantially. The RX 7600S has a TDP of 75 W and requires no power connectors, making it suitable for integrated implementations. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has a TDP of 160 W, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 450 W power supply.

The physical specifications also differ. The RX 7600S is listed as IGP form factor with no dimensions recorded. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is a dual-slot card measuring 240 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The bus interface differs, with the AMD card using PCIe 4.0 x16 and the NVIDIA card using PCIe 4.0 x8. Display outputs are portable device dependent for the AMD card, while the NVIDIA card has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

The launch MSRP for the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is 399 USD. No MSRP is recorded for the RX 7600S.

The Verdict

The data presents an asymmetric comparison. The AMD Radeon RX 7600S has a complete set of benchmark results, an average score of 16,696, and a percentile ranking of 60. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 has no benchmark results, an average score of 0, and a percentile ranking of 50. This means the RX 7600S has a measured performance profile, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 can only be evaluated on its specifications.

From the specification data, the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 holds clear advantages in FP32 throughput (22.06 TFLOPS versus 15.77 TFLOPS), texture rate (344.8 GTexel/s versus 246.4 GTexel/s), memory bandwidth (288.0 GB/s versus 256.0 GB/s), shading units (4,352 versus 1,792), ray tracing cores (34 versus 28), and tensor cores (136 versus none). The RX 7600S leads in pixel rate (140.8 GPixel/s versus 121.7 GPixel/s), FP16 throughput relative to FP32 (2:1 versus 1:1), and power efficiency on paper (75 W TDP versus 160 W TDP).

The percentile rankings suggest the RX 7600S sits at the 60th percentile, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 sits at the 50th percentile. However, given that the NVIDIA card has no measured scores, this percentile likely reflects its specification-based position rather than actual test results. The RX 7600S also has the advantage of being an Active product, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 is End-of-life.

For users who require measured performance data from the database, the RX 7600S is the only card with recorded results. Its average score of 16,696 places it in a tight competitive band with several NVIDIA professional and consumer parts. For users who prioritize raw specification headroom, the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 offers higher compute throughput, more shading units, and faster memory, but without benchmark confirmation of how those specifications translate into real-world scores.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600S wins in the database on measured performance evidence. It has ten recorded benchmark scores across 3DMark, Geekbench, and Passmark suites. Its percentile ranking of 60 indicates it performs above the median GPU in the database. It also wins on pixel fill rate, delivering 140.8 GPixel/s compared to 121.7 GPixel/s for the NVIDIA card. The FP16 throughput of 31.54 TFLOPS is 43% higher than the NVIDIA card's 22.06 TFLOPS, making it the stronger choice for half-precision compute workloads.

The RX 7600S also wins on power efficiency. Its 75 W TDP is less than half of the 160 W TDP for the RTX 4060 Ti AD104, and it requires no power connectors. Its IGP form factor means it can be integrated directly into portable devices, whereas the NVIDIA card requires a dual-slot expansion card with a 16-pin power connector. The AMD card is also an Active production product, while the NVIDIA card is End-of-life.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti AD104 wins on raw compute specifications. Its FP32 throughput of 22.06 TFLOPS is 40% higher than the AMD card. Its texture rate of 344.8 GTexel/s is 40% higher. Its memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s is 12.5% higher. It has 2.4 times the shading units, 1.2 times the ray tracing cores, and 136 tensor cores where the AMD card has none. Its base clock of 2310 MHz is 54% higher than the AMD card's base clock of 1500 MHz, and its boost clock of 2535 MHz is 15% higher than the AMD card's boost clock of 2200 MHz.

The NVIDIA card also wins on connectivity and physical design. It offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the AMD card's outputs are portable device dependent. The NVIDIA card has a defined physical footprint of 240 mm by 111 mm by 40 mm, while the AMD card has no recorded dimensions.

The use-case split is clear from the data. The RX 7600S suits integrated, power-constrained portable designs where the 75 W TDP and no-connector requirement are decisive. The RTX 4060 Ti AD104 suits desktop configurations where the 160 W TDP, dual-slot footprint, and 450 W suggested PSU can be accommodated, and where higher FP32 throughput, texture rate, and memory bandwidth are the priority. The RX 7600S has the measured results to back its position, while the RTX 4060 Ti AD104 must rely on its specification sheet, which shows a substantially more powerful compute engine on paper.