AMD Radeon RX 7600M vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains only one direct benchmark submission for the AMD Radeon RX 7600M: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no benchmark entries in the database, so its average benchmark score is recorded as 0. Direct head-to-head comparisons are therefore limited to the AMD part's position relative to its nearest rivals in the database.

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M's OpenCL score of 63775 places it at the 89th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56, which scores 63693, a delta of 0.1% in favor of the RX 7600M. The margin is narrow, just 82 points. Against the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP, the RX 7600M trails by 55 points (63830 versus 63775), a delta of -0.1%. The NVIDIA CMP 30HX scores 63842, also -0.1% relative to the RX 7600M. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 leads this group with 64212, putting the RX 7600M 0.7% behind.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores and no nearest rivals listed. The database shows no wins for either part in head-to-head testing, reflecting the absence of a shared benchmark workload in the records.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design families. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M uses the Navi 33 chip on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, and belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) generation. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Twin Lake chip on the Xe-LP architecture, part of the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown.

The Radeon RX 7600M's compute configuration is substantially larger. It carries 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 raster operation pipelines, and 28 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores listed. The RX 7600M delivers 17.27 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 34.55 TFLOPS of FP16 (2:1 ratio). The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile delivers 384.0 GFLOPS FP32 and 768.0 GFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio), which is roughly 45 times lower in FP32 throughput.

Clock behavior differs sharply. The RX 7600M has a base clock of 1500 MHz, a boost clock of 2410 MHz, and a game clock of 2070 MHz. The Intel part runs at a 300 MHz base and 1000 MHz boost, with no game clock listed. Memory architecture is also divergent: the RX 7600M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and a 2000 MHz memory clock (16 Gbps effective). The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory, with shared type, shared bus width, and system dependent bandwidth.

The RX 7600M's pixel rate is 154.2 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 269.9 GTexel/s. The Intel part manages 4.000 GPixel/s and 12.00 GTexel/s. API support differs: the AMD part supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both use an IGP slot width, and both have portable device dependent display outputs. The RX 7600M uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, while the Intel part uses a Ring Bus.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7600M compare to its closest rival in the database?

A: The RX 7600M scores 63775 in Geekbench OpenCL, 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (63693) and 0.1% behind both the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (63830) and NVIDIA CMP 30HX (63842).

Q: Does the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: What are the power requirements of each processor?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M has a TDP of 90 W and lists no power connectors. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the AMD Radeon RX 7600M?

A: It uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth and a 2000 MHz memory clock (16 Gbps effective).

Q: What is the memory configuration of the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile?

A: It uses system shared memory, with system shared type, system shared bus width, and system dependent bandwidth.

Q: Which part has ray tracing hardware?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M includes 28 ray tracing cores. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile lists no ray tracing cores.

The Verdict

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M is the only one of the two with measurable performance data in the database. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775 puts it at the 89th percentile of all recorded GPUs, and it trades places with the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56, AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP, and NVIDIA CMP 30HX within a narrow 0.7% band. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded scores, no nearest rivals, and an average benchmark score of 0, so the database offers no basis for a quantitative comparison of its performance.

The architectural gap is decisive on paper. The RX 7600M has roughly 9.3 times the shading units, 9.3 times the TMUs, and 16 times the ROPs of the Intel part. Its FP32 throughput of 17.27 TFLOPS versus 384.0 GFLOPS is a difference of roughly 45 times. The RX 7600M also has dedicated GDDR6 memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel part depends on system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The RX 7600M includes 28 ray tracing cores; the Intel part has none.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile operates at a much lower TDP of 6 W compared to 90 W, and its 10 nm process at Intel contrasts with the RX 7600M's 6 nm process at TSMC. The database records the Intel part as active in production, but without benchmark data it cannot be positioned relative to the RX 7600M in any workload. For any user choosing strictly from the recorded data, the RX 7600M is the only part with demonstrated compute capability.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in every major specification field. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M uses the Navi 33 chip, RDNA 3.0 architecture, codename Hotpink Bonefish, and belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 7000M) generation. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Twin Lake chip, Xe-LP architecture, and belongs to the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation. Process node: 6 nm at TSMC for AMD, 10 nm at Intel for Intel. Transistor count: 13,300 million for AMD, unknown for Intel. Die size: 204 mm² for AMD, unknown for Intel. Transistor density: 65.2M / mm² for AMD, not listed for Intel.

Clock speeds: AMD lists base 1500 MHz, boost 2410 MHz, and game 2070 MHz. Intel lists base 300 MHz and boost 1000 MHz, with no game clock. Memory: AMD uses 8 GB GDDR6, 128-bit bus, 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). Intel uses system shared memory, system shared type, system shared bus width, and system dependent bandwidth.

Compute units: AMD has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. Intel has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores. Pixel rate: 154.2 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 269.9 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s. FP32: 17.27 TFLOPS versus 384.0 GFLOPS. FP16: 34.55 TFLOPS versus 768.0 GFLOPS, both at 2:1 ratio. TDP: 90 W versus 6 W. Power connectors: none listed for AMD, not listed for Intel. Bus interface: PCIe 4.0 x16 for AMD, Ring Bus for Intel.

API support: AMD supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Intel supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Release dates: AMD released on 2023-01-03, Intel on 2024-12-31. The AMD part's predecessor is listed as Polaris Mobile; the Intel part has no predecessor listed. Both have no successor listed. Both are marked Active in production status. Neither has a launch MSRP in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600M wins in every category where the database records measurable data. It has the only benchmark score, 63775 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it at the 89th percentile. It wins on dedicated memory bandwidth with 256.0 GB/s versus system dependent bandwidth for the Intel part. It wins on raw compute throughput with 17.27 TFLOPS FP32. It wins on pixel throughput at 154.2 GPixel/s and texture throughput at 269.9 GTexel/s. It is the only part with ray tracing cores, 28 of them. It supports the higher DirectX feature level of 12 Ultimate (12_2) versus 12 (12_1).

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins on power efficiency as recorded by TDP, drawing 6 W versus 90 W. It also has a more recent release date in the database, 2024-12-31 versus 2023-01-03. Its Ring Bus interface differs from the PCIe 4.0 x16 of the AMD part, though the database does not quantify any performance benefit from that bus. The Intel part's FP16 throughput of 768.0 GFLOPS is double its FP32 figure, matching the 2:1 ratio of the AMD part, but both figures remain far below the AMD part's numbers.

The database shows no benchmark wins for either part in head-to-head testing because no shared test exists in the records. Based on available data, the RX 7600M is positioned for workloads that demand high compute throughput, dedicated graphics memory, and ray tracing support. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is positioned for low-power operation at 6 W, with system shared memory and integrated graphics expectations. The percentile data reinforces the split: the RX 7600M sits at the 89th percentile of all GPUs, while the Intel part sits at the 50th percentile with no recorded score to support that placement.