AMD Radeon PRO W7500 vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon PRO W7500?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 records an average benchmark score of 16415, placing it at the 59th percentile among all GPUs in the database.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no benchmark entries in the database, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0. Its percentile ranking is 50, based on its position relative to other integrated graphics solutions.

Q: Which GPU has a higher shading unit count?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 uses 1792 shading units, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses 192 shading units. The AMD part has roughly nine times the shading unit count of the Intel part.

Q: What memory configurations are used by these two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory, with its bandwidth described as system dependent.

Q: What are the thermal design power ratings for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has a TDP of 70 W and requires a suggested power supply of 250 W. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W and lists no suggested power supply.

Q: Which GPU supports hardware ray tracing?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 includes 28 ray tracing cores. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile lists no ray tracing cores in its specifications.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 is built on the Navi 33 chip using the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation. The process node is 6 nm at TSMC, with a transistor count of 13,300 million and a die size of 204 mm². Transistor density for this part is 65.2M per mm². The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Twin Lake chip with the Xe-LP architecture and is part of the HD Graphics-T generation. Its process node is 10 nm at Intel. Transistor count and die size for the Intel part are listed as unknown.

The clock behavior differs substantially. The AMD GPU has a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 1700 MHz, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz or 16 Gbps effective. The Intel GPU has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz, with memory labeled as system shared. The compute pipelines diverge in scale. The AMD part has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 4 ROPs. The AMD GPU includes 28 ray tracing cores; the Intel GPU lists none.

The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 offers 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile relies entirely on system shared memory, with bus width and memory type also listed as system shared. Bandwidth is system dependent. The AMD part delivers a pixel rate of 108.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 190.4 GTexel/s. The Intel part delivers 4.000 GPixel/s and 12.00 GTexel/s. Floating point throughput is 12.19 TFLOPS for FP32 and 24.37 TFLOPS for FP16 on the AMD side, while the Intel part delivers 384.0 GFLOPS for FP32 and 768.0 GFLOPS for FP16.

Power and physical design differ sharply. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 has a 70 W TDP, a single-slot form factor, no power connectors, and a suggested power supply of 250 W. Its dimensions are 216 mm in length, 115 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a 6 W TDP, is an IGP (integrated graphics processor), has no power connector data, and no suggested power supply. Its dimensions are not listed. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 for the AMD part and Ring Bus for the Intel part. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 2.1 for the AMD GPU and portable device dependent for the Intel GPU. The AMD part supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Verdict

The data indicates two GPUs aimed at completely different segments. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 is a discrete workstation part with substantial compute resources, dedicated memory, and ray tracing support. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated solution with minimal shading units, no ray tracing cores, and shared memory. Benchmark results exist only for the AMD part, with an average score of 16415 and a 59th percentile ranking. The Intel part has no recorded benchmarks and an average score of zero.

Professionals requiring sustained compute throughput, dedicated memory bandwidth, and candidate compatibility for workstation workloads should consider the AMD Radeon PRO W7500. Its 12.19 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth place it in a different performance class. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is suited for low-power mobile systems where basic display output and light compute tasks are the priority. Its 6 W TDP and system shared memory reflect an integrated design optimized for efficiency rather than raw performance. The production status for both GPUs is active, so both remain available. The AMD part has a launch MSRP of 429 USD. The Intel part has no launch MSRP listed.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across every major specification category. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 uses the Navi 33 chip, RDNA 3.0 architecture, and the Hotpink Bonefish codename. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Twin Lake chip and Xe-LP architecture with no codename listed. The process node is 6 nm at TSMC for AMD versus 10 nm at Intel. Transistors are 13,300 million for AMD, unknown for Intel. Die size is 204 mm² for AMD, unknown for Intel. Transistor density is 65.2M per mm² for AMD, not listed for Intel.

Clock speeds: AMD base 1500 MHz, boost 1700 MHz, memory 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). Intel base 300 MHz, boost 1000 MHz, memory system shared. Memory: AMD 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. Intel system shared for size, type, and bus width, with system dependent bandwidth. Compute units: AMD has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. Intel has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, 4 ROPs, and no ray tracing cores. Pixel rate is 108.8 GPixel/s for AMD versus 4.000 GPixel/s for Intel. Texture rate is 190.4 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s. FP32 is 12.19 TFLOPS versus 384.0 GFLOPS. FP16 is 24.37 TFLOPS versus 768.0 GFLOPS.

TDP is 70 W for AMD and 6 W for Intel. Slot width is single-slot for AMD and IGP for Intel. Power connectors are none for AMD and not listed for Intel. Suggested PSU is 250 W for AMD and not listed for Intel. Bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 for AMD and Ring Bus for Intel. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 2.1 for AMD and portable device dependent for Intel. DirectX support is 12 Ultimate (12_2) for AMD and 12 (12_1) for Intel. OpenGL is 4.6 for both. Vulkan is 1.4 for both. Dimensions are 216 mm by 115 mm by 20 mm for AMD, not listed for Intel. Release date is 2023-08-02 for AMD and 2024-12-31 for Intel. The AMD part lists Radeon Pro Vega as its predecessor; the Intel part lists no predecessor. The AMD part has a launch MSRP of 429 USD; the Intel part has none.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no paired head-to-head benchmark entries for these two GPUs. The only benchmark data available belongs to the AMD Radeon PRO W7500. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 58213, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 68634. Passmark results include 65 for DirectX 10, 125 for DirectX 11, 46 for DirectX 12, 200 for DirectX 9, 1174 for G2D, 13368 for G3D, and 5910 for GPU compute.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no benchmark entries, so direct numerical comparison is impossible. The specification gap provides context. The AMD part delivers 12.19 TFLOPS FP32, a 31.7 times higher figure than the Intel part's 384.0 GFLOPS. Pixel rate is 27.2 times higher at 108.8 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 15.9 times higher at 190.4 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s. Memory bandwidth is 256.0 GB/s for the AMD part versus system dependent for the Intel part. The AMD GPU has 1792 shading units versus 192, a 9.3 times difference. Ray tracing cores exist only on the AMD side, with 28 cores.

The nearest rivals in the database for the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 provide useful context for its performance tier. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell has an average score of 16408, a 0% delta from the AMD part. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT scores 16361, which is 0.3% behind. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M scores 16351, 0.4% behind. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16504, which is 0.5% ahead. These deltas show the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 sits in a narrow performance band around 16400 average score, essentially matching the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell and slightly trailing the RTX 5090 D V2.

The 59th percentile ranking for the AMD part means it outperforms roughly half of all GPUs in the database. The Intel part's 50th percentile ranking with no benchmark data likely reflects its position among integrated graphics parts rather than any measured compute result. The lack of head-to-head data and the absence of Intel benchmark scores mean the analysis relies on architectural specifications and the AMD part's standalone results. The recorded data confirms the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 occupies a workstation-oriented performance tier, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile targets low-power integrated scenarios. The average benchmark score of 16415 for the AMD part, combined with its nearest rival deltas of 0%, 0.3%, 0.4%, and -0.5%, indicates a tightly clustered competitive field around its performance point. The Intel part has no comparable data, so its relative standing cannot be quantified beyond its specification sheet.