AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D versus the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. Both entries show an average benchmark score of 0, and the wins tally stands at 0 for each part. The absence of measured frames-per-second or synthetic scores means the comparison must rely on architectural specifications and calculated throughput rates rather than empirical test data.

What the available figures do show is a massive gulf in raw compute capability. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D delivers 24.82 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile manages 384.0 GFLOPS. That places the AMD part at roughly 64 times the single-precision throughput of the Intel integrated graphics. Similarly, the pixel fill rate for the AMD card is 193.9 GPixel/s against 4.000 GPixel/s for the Intel solution, a difference of nearly 48 times. Texture rate tells the same story: 387.8 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s, a 32-fold gap.

These are not close competitors. The data indicates two products designed for entirely different workloads and power envelopes. The AMD part is a discrete workstation accelerator with a 150 W TDP, while the Intel part is a 6 W integrated graphics processor meant for basic display output and light acceleration.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D uses the RDNA 4.0 architecture, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, and is based on the Navi 48 chip. It belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi generation, specifically the Navi IV Series. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Xe-LP architecture, built on a 10 nm process at Intel, and is based on the Twin Lake chip, part of the HD Graphics-T generation.

Transistor counts reveal the scale difference. The AMD chip packs 53,900 million transistors onto a 357 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 151.0 million per square millimeter. The Intel chip's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database, so no direct comparison can be made on those fields.

The AMD GPU includes 48 ray tracing cores, a feature entirely absent from the Intel part, which lists no RT cores. The AMD card also carries 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs. That is a 16-fold difference in shading units, a 16-fold difference in TMUs, and a 24-fold difference in ROPs.

Memory architecture differs fundamentally. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D uses 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory with a system-dependent bandwidth figure. The AMD card's memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, translating to 18 Gbps effective, while the Intel part has no dedicated memory clock.

API support differs slightly. Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, but the AMD part supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) while the Intel part is limited to DirectX 12 (12_1). The AMD card also supports FP16 at a 1:1 ratio to FP32, delivering 24.82 TFLOPS, whereas the Intel part's FP16 throughput is 768.0 GFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D delivers 24.82 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, compared to 384.0 GFLOPS for the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile.

Q: Do both GPUs support ray tracing?

A: No. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D includes 48 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile lists no ray tracing cores at all.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D uses 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D has a 150 W TDP and requires a 450 W suggested power supply with a single 16-pin connector. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a 6 W TDP and lists no power connectors or PSU requirement.

Q: What is the difference in DirectX support?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1).

Q: Which GPU is larger physically?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D is a single-slot card measuring 241 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 19 mm in width. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated graphics processor with no listed dimensions.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ across nearly every measured specification in the database.

Process and chip: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D uses a 4 nm process at TSMC with the Navi 48 chip. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses a 10 nm process at Intel with the Twin Lake chip.

Transistor count: The AMD chip contains 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die. The Intel chip's transistor count and die size are unknown.

Clocks: The AMD GPU has a base clock of 1080 MHz and a boost clock of 2020 MHz, with a game clock of 1080 MHz. The Intel GPU has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz.

Memory: The AMD card has 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and a 2250 MHz memory clock. The Intel part uses system shared memory with no dedicated bus width or bandwidth figure.

Compute units: The AMD card has 3,072 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, plus 48 RT cores. The Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, with no RT cores.

Fill rates: The AMD GPU achieves 193.9 GPixel/s pixel rate and 387.8 GTexel/s texture rate. The Intel GPU achieves 4.000 GPixel/s and 12.00 GTexel/s.

FP32 and FP16: The AMD card delivers 24.82 TFLOPS in both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio). The Intel part delivers 384.0 GFLOPS in FP32 and 768.0 GFLOPS in FP16 (2:1 ratio).

Power and cooling: The AMD card has a 150 W TDP, is single-slot, uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 450 W PSU. The Intel part has a 6 W TDP, is an IGP, and lists no power connector or PSU suggestion.

Bus interface: The AMD card uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The Intel part uses a Ring Bus.

Display outputs: The AMD card provides 1x DisplayPort 2.1a. The Intel part's display outputs are portable device dependent.

Release timing: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D was released on 2025-12-10. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile was released on 2024-12-31.

The Verdict

The database shows two GPUs with no overlapping use cases. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D is a discrete workstation accelerator with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory, 48 RT cores, and 24.82 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. It targets professional rendering, AI workloads, and heavy graphics tasks where memory bandwidth and compute throughput matter. The 150 W TDP and single-slot design indicate a card meant for a desktop workstation with a dedicated power supply.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated graphics solution with 192 shading units, system shared memory, and 384.0 GFLOPS of FP32 compute. Its 6 W TDP and Ring Bus interface indicate it is embedded in a mobile or low-power platform where the CPU provides the graphics. It is not a competitor to the AMD part in any measurable sense.

The data suggests that any workload requiring significant graphics compute, ray tracing, or high-bandwidth memory should use the AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is suited only for systems where power efficiency is paramount and graphics demands are minimal, such as basic display output or lightweight acceleration.

Where Each One Wins

AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D wins on:

• Raw compute: 24.82 TFLOPS FP32 versus 384.0 GFLOPS, a 64-fold advantage
• Pixel throughput: 193.9 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s
• Texture throughput: 387.8 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s
• Memory capacity and bandwidth: 32 GB GDDR6 at 576.0 GB/s versus system shared
• Ray tracing: 48 dedicated RT cores versus none
• DirectX feature level: 12 Ultimate (12_2) versus 12 (12_1)
• Shading resources: 3,072 units versus 192
• Rasterization: 96 ROPs versus 4

Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins on:

• Power draw: 6 W TDP versus 150 W
• Physical footprint: integrated into the processor versus a 241 mm add-in card
• Power delivery simplicity: no external power connector or PSU requirement
• Release timing: available earlier at 2024-12-31 versus 2025-12-10

The Intel part also holds an advantage in FP16 efficiency relative to its FP32 rate, delivering 768.0 GFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, but this does not compensate for the absolute gap in performance. The AMD part's FP16 output of 24.82 TFLOPS is still over 32 times higher.