AMD Radeon 760M vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data available for this comparison is heavily one-sided. The AMD Radeon 760M has a substantial set of recorded performance results across multiple test suites, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This lack of direct comparative data means the head-to-head assessment relies entirely on the AMD part's absolute scores and its position relative to other GPUs in the database.

The Radeon 760M delivers an average benchmark score of 6019 across all recorded tests. Its percentile ranking sits at 35, meaning it outperforms roughly a third of all GPUs tracked in the database. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 0 due to the absence of any recorded results, though its percentile ranking is listed at 50, a figure that carries no practical weight without underlying scores.

Looking at the AMD part's individual results, the strongest showing comes from the Geekbench Vulkan test at 30336 points, followed by Geekbench OpenCL at 20255. The Passmark G3D score of 5310 and Passmark GPU Compute score of 2840 further demonstrate the GPU's compute-oriented capabilities. DirectX performance is more varied: Passmark DirectX 9 scores 65, DirectX 11 scores 52, DirectX 12 scores 25, and DirectX 10 scores 19. The 2D workload score of 890 indicates modest desktop rendering throughput.

The nearest rivals in the database provide context for the AMD part's performance tier. The Radeon RX 6400 averages 6001, sitting 0.3% behind the 760M. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M also averages 6000, again 0.3% behind. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server averages 5996, trailing by 0.4%. On the other side, the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 averages 6049, which is 0.5% ahead of the 760M. These delta values place the Radeon 760M in a tightly contested performance band where small margins separate it from its closest competitors.

Because the Intel part has no benchmark entries, no win count can be assigned to either side in a direct comparison. The database records zero wins for both the AMD and Intel parts in head-to-head testing, confirming that no direct comparative benchmarks exist between these two specific GPUs.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon 760M?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M has an average benchmark score of 6019 across all recorded tests in the database.

Q: Does the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no benchmark entries in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 760M compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6400?

A: The Radeon 760M averages 6019, which is 0.3% higher than the Radeon RX 6400's average of 6001.

Q: What is the highest recorded benchmark score for the AMD Radeon 760M?

A: The highest recorded score is 30336 on the Geekbench Vulkan test, followed by 20255 on Geekbench OpenCL.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a percentile ranking of 50 against all GPUs, but this figure is based on no recorded benchmark scores and therefore carries no practical meaning.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M has a boost clock of 2599 MHz, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a boost clock of 1000 MHz.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different architectural lineages. The AMD Radeon 760M uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture and belongs to the Navi III IGP (Phoenix) generation, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Xe-LP architecture and belongs to the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation, built on a 10 nm process at Intel.

The AMD part integrates 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 142.6 million per square millimeter. The Intel part does not have disclosed transistor count, die size, or density figures in the database. This fabrication difference directly influences power characteristics: the AMD GPU has a 15 W TDP, while the Intel GPU has a 6 W TDP.

Compute resources differ sharply. The Radeon 760M contains 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, 16 render output units, and 8 ray tracing cores. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile contains 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 4 render output units, with no ray tracing cores listed. The AMD part's larger execution resource pool translates to far higher theoretical throughput: 5.323 TFLOPS FP32 and 5.323 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1 ratio) versus the Intel part's 384.0 GFLOPS FP32 and 768.0 GFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio).

Clock speeds also diverge significantly. The AMD GPU runs at an 800 MHz base clock with a 2599 MHz boost, while the Intel GPU runs at a 300 MHz base clock with a 1000 MHz boost. Pixel and texture rates follow suit: the Radeon 760M produces 41.58 GPixel/s and 83.17 GTexel/s, whereas the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile produces 4.000 GPixel/s and 12.00 GTexel/s.

Memory architecture is identical in concept: both use System Shared memory with System Dependent bandwidth. The bus interface differs, with the AMD part using PCIe 4.0 x8 and the Intel part using a Ring Bus. API support also differs: the AMD GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel GPU supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Verdict

The data clearly indicates that the AMD Radeon 760M is the far more capable GPU for any workload that requires raw graphics performance. With an average benchmark score of 6019 and a full suite of recorded results, it has demonstrated measurable capability across DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan, and compute tests. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, with zero recorded benchmarks, cannot be assessed for performance from the database.

Users who need a GPU with confirmed performance in modern graphics APIs should select the AMD Radeon 760M. Its DirectX 12 Ultimate support and 8 ray tracing cores make it suitable for current-generation gaming workloads. The Intel part's DirectX 12 (12_1) support and lack of ray tracing cores place it in a lower feature tier.

For systems where power consumption is the primary constraint, the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses 6 W versus the AMD part's 15 W. However, the performance gap is substantial: the AMD GPU offers 13.9 times the FP32 throughput (5.323 TFLOPS versus 384.0 GFLOPS) and 10.4 times the pixel rate (41.58 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s). The Intel part's lower power draw does not compensate for this magnitude of performance deficit in any benchmark-driven scenario.

The release dates place the AMD GPU in the market from 2024-01-30 and the Intel GPU from 2024-12-31. Both remain actively produced. The AMD part has a predecessor in the Navi II IGP, while the Intel part has no recorded predecessor.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two GPUs:

• Architecture: AMD uses RDNA 3.0, Intel uses Xe-LP
• Generation: AMD is Navi III IGP (Phoenix), Intel is HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake)
• Process Node: AMD uses 4 nm at TSMC, Intel uses 10 nm at Intel
• Transistors: AMD has 25,390 million, Intel is unknown
• Die Size: AMD has 178 mm², Intel is unknown
• Transistor Density: AMD has 142.6M per mm², Intel has no figure
• Base Clock: AMD runs 800 MHz, Intel runs 300 MHz
• Boost Clock: AMD runs 2599 MHz, Intel runs 1000 MHz
• Shading Units: AMD has 512, Intel has 192
• TMUs: AMD has 32, Intel has 12
• ROPs: AMD has 16, Intel has 4
• Ray Tracing Cores: AMD has 8, Intel has none
• Pixel Rate: AMD produces 41.58 GPixel/s, Intel produces 4.000 GPixel/s
• Texture Rate: AMD produces 83.17 GTexel/s, Intel produces 12.00 GTexel/s
• FP32: AMD delivers 5.323 TFLOPS, Intel delivers 384.0 GFLOPS
• FP16: AMD delivers 5.323 TFLOPS (1:1), Intel delivers 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1)
• TDP: AMD uses 15 W, Intel uses 6 W
• Bus Interface: AMD uses PCIe 4.0 x8, Intel uses Ring Bus
• Display Outputs: AMD is Motherboard Dependent, Intel is Portable Device Dependent
• DirectX Support: AMD supports 12 Ultimate (12_2), Intel supports 12 (12_1)
• Release Date: AMD launched 2024-01-30, Intel launched 2024-12-31
• Predecessor: AMD has Navi II IGP, Intel has none

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 760M wins in every performance category with recorded data. Its 512 shading units and 8 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, a feature entirely absent from the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. The AMD part's DirectX 12 Ultimate support provides access to the full feature set of modern graphics APIs, while the Intel part is limited to DirectX 12 (12_1).

For compute-heavy workloads, the AMD GPU's 5.323 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and Geekbench OpenCL score of 20255 demonstrate strong general-purpose compute capability. The Passmark GPU Compute score of 2840 reinforces this position. The Intel part's 384.0 GFLOPS FP32 output is roughly 7% of the AMD figure, placing it in a fundamentally lower compute tier.

The one area where the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile holds an advantage is power draw. At 6 W TDP, it consumes 40% of the AMD part's 15 W TDP. For portable devices with strict thermal budgets, this lower power envelope could be preferable, but it comes with a massive performance trade-off.

Desktop and mobile systems that prioritize graphics performance should use the AMD Radeon 760M. Systems where power efficiency is the sole criterion might consider the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, but the database contains no benchmark evidence that it can handle anything beyond basic 2D or light 3D workloads. The AMD part's 890 Passmark G2D score versus the Intel part's absence of any recorded score leaves even the 2D comparison unresolved in favor of AMD based on available data.