AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 Comparison

# NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs AMD Radeon 760M

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 and the AMD Radeon 760M occupy entirely different tiers of the graphics hardware spectrum, and the benchmark data confirms this stark divide. In the sole head-to-head 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 scores 6269.5 against the 760M’s 400, a delta of 1467.4% in favor of the NVIDIA part. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a triple-slot, 285 W discrete card built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with 8448 shading units, while the 760M is a 15 W integrated graphics processor (IGP) on AMD’s Phoenix chip with 512 shading units. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER sits at the 36th percentile among all GPUs in the database, whereas the 760M ranks at the 35th percentile; these nearly identical percentile positions, despite the enormous performance gap, reflect the database’s scoring methodology across a wide range of workloads, but the raw 3DMark result leaves no ambiguity about their relative capabilities.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear directive: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is the choice for anyone requiring discrete, high-throughput rendering performance, as evidenced by its 6269.5 score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 — a result 1467.4% higher than the AMD Radeon 760M’s 400 in the same test. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 compute, 672.3 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus position it as a serious performer for demanding 3D workloads. Conversely, the 760M, with its 5.323 TFLOPS FP32 and system-shared memory, is an IGP designed for basic graphics tasks; its 15 W TDP and lack of dedicated memory make it unsuitable for high-end gaming or compute. For users building a desktop with a dedicated PCIe 4.0 x16 slot and a 600 W suggested PSU, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only logical pick. For ultra-low-power, space-constrained systems where motherboard-dependent display output and zero additional power connectors are acceptable, the 760M fits that niche. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s end-of-life production status suggests it is a mature product, while the 760M remains active; however, the performance delta is so large that this status difference does little to bridge the functional gap.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 wins the only head-to-head benchmark available, the 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 test, with a score of 6269.5 versus the AMD Radeon 760M’s 400. This single win (winsA: 1) means the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER takes the 3DMark Steel Nomad crown outright. The 760M records zero wins (winsB: 0) in direct comparison. However, the 760M shows relative strength in certain non-head-to-head benchmarks: its Geekbench OpenCL score of 20255 and Vulkan score of 30336, along with a Passmark G3D score of 5310, indicate it is not entirely without utility. Notably, the 760M’s Passmark DirectX 9 score of 65 is its highest among the DirectX variants tested, suggesting legacy API workloads are handled comparatively better than modern ones. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 250.6 GPixel/s pixel rate and 689.0 GTexel/s texture rate dwarf the 760M’s 41.58 GPixel/s and 83.17 GTexel/s, reinforcing that the NVIDIA card wins in fill-rate-bound scenarios. The 760M’s system-shared memory means bandwidth is system-dependent, whereas the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s fixed 672.3 GB/s provides predictable performance. For users prioritizing ray tracing, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 66 RT cores versus the 760M’s 8 RT cores suggest a substantial advantage in that workload, though no direct RT benchmark is present in the data.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on fundamentally different architectures and processes. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 uses the Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm TSMC node, packing 76,300 million transistors into a 609 mm² die with a transistor density of 125.3M per mm². The AMD Radeon 760M, part of the Navi III IGP (Phoenix) generation, uses RDNA 3.0 on a 4 nm TSMC node, containing 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die with a density of 142.6M per mm². The NVIDIA chip’s larger die and higher transistor count translate into 8448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, versus the AMD IGP’s 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. Memory configuration differs sharply: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth, while the 760M uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. Clock behavior also diverges — the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a base clock of 2340 MHz and boost of 2610 MHz, whereas the 760M boosts from 800 MHz to 2599 MHz. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, but the NVIDIA card adds 264 tensor cores and 264 RT cores, while the 760M has 8 RT cores and no tensor core listing. Power delivery reflects their roles: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER draws 285 W TDP with a 1x 16-pin connector and 600 W suggested PSU, while the 760M runs at 15 W with no power connectors. The NVIDIA card uses PCIe 4.0 x16, the AMD IGP PCIe 4.0 x8. Physical presence differs as well — the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a triple-slot card measuring 310 mm x 140 mm x 61 mm, while the 760M is an IGP with no standalone dimensions. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER was released on 2024-06-09 and is end-of-life, succeeding the GeForce 30 series and preceding GeForce 50; the 760M launched 2024-01-30, succeeding Navi II IGP, and remains active.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has an average benchmark score of 6270, while the AMD Radeon 760M averages 6019 across its benchmark suite. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, matches it exactly at 6270 with a 0% delta.

Q: How do the two GPUs compare in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5 in 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12, while the AMD Radeon 760M scores 400. This yields a delta of 1467.4% in favor of the NVIDIA card, which is the only head-to-head result in the data.

Q: What are the memory specifications for each GPU?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The AMD Radeon 760M uses system-shared memory, with system-dependent bandwidth and no dedicated memory type or bus width specified.

Q: Which GPU consumes less power, and what are the TDP figures?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M has a TDP of 15 W and requires no power connectors, making it far more power-efficient than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, which has a 285 W TDP and needs a 1x 16-pin connector with a 600 W suggested PSU.

Q: Are both GPUs compatible with the same APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. However, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER also includes 264 tensor cores and 66 RT cores, whereas the 760M has only 8 RT cores and no tensor core data.

Q: What is the production status and release date of each?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 is end-of-life and was released on 2024-06-09; its launch MSRP is 799 USD. The AMD Radeon 760M is active, released on 2024-01-30, and has no launch MSRP listed.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The single head-to-head benchmark in the data is 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12, where the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 delivers a score of 6269.5 against the AMD Radeon 760M’s 400. This represents a delta of 1467.4%, meaning the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER outperforms the 760M by nearly fifteen-fold in this DirectX 12 workload. To contextualize this within the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s rival set, its nearest competitor is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER at an identical 6270 average score (0% delta), followed by the AMD FirePro W600 at 6223 (0.8% faster), the NVIDIA Quadro K620 at 6282 (-0.2%), and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 at 6327 (-0.9%). These deltas are all within 1%, indicating that the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER sits in a tightly clustered performance band among its peers — yet the 760M is nowhere near that band. For the 760M, its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6400 at 6001 (0.3% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M at 6000 (0.3% faster), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server at 5996 (0.4% faster), and the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 at 6049 (-0.5%). The 760M’s average score of 6019 places it just 4% below the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s average of 6270, but the 3DMark Steel Nomad result reveals the true gap under modern DX12 load. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s FP32 compute of 44.10 TFLOPS versus the 760M’s 5.323 TFLOPS — an 8.3x difference — aligns with the benchmark outcome, as does the texture rate of 689.0 GTexel/s versus 83.17 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA card’s 96 ROPs and 264 TMUs provide the hardware resources needed for the 250.6 GPixel/s pixel rate, while the 760M’s 16 ROPs and 32 TMUs yield 41.58 GPixel/s. In every measurable category that feeds into the 3DMark result, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER holds a commanding lead, and the 1467.4% delta in the head-to-head test is consistent with these architectural advantages. The 760M’s higher boost clock of 2599 MHz compared to the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 2610 MHz is nearly identical, but the NVIDIA card’s massive shading unit count (8448 vs 512) overwhelms any clock advantage. The 760M’s Passmark scores — G3D 5310, GPU Compute 2840, and DirectX 11 at 52 — offer a broader view of its integrated capabilities, but none approach the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 3DMark performance. For users seeking a definitive answer from the data: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins the only test that matters in this comparison, and it wins by an order of magnitude.