AMD Instinct MI300A vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Instinct MI300A and the Intel Arc Pro B370. Neither GPU lists any benchmark scores, average benchmark scores, or nearest rival data. The winsA and winsB fields are both zero, indicating that no comparative performance tests have been logged. This absence of data means any direct numeric comparison between the two accelerators is not possible from the available records. What the database does provide, however, is a full set of architectural specifications that reveal two fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Instinct MI300A is a massive data-center accelerator with 14,592 shading units, 912 texture mapping units, and a 5.32 TB/s memory bandwidth. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor with 1,280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 render output units. The disparity in raw compute resources is considerable, with the MI300A delivering 61.29 TFLOPS of FP32 performance against the Arc Pro B370's 6.144 TFLOPS. That is a 10x difference in peak single-precision throughput. In FP16, the Intel part reaches 12.29 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio, while the AMD part lists no FP16 figure in the database.

Texture rate further illustrates the gap: the MI300A produces 1,915.2 GTexel/s, while the Arc Pro B370 produces 96.00 GTexel/s. Pixel rate tells a different story, as the MI300A lists 0 MPixel/s due to having no ROPs, while the Arc Pro B370 lists 48.00 GPixel/s. The MI300A is not designed for rasterization output, whereas the Intel part is a conventional graphics processor with dedicated pixel pipelines. Clock speeds show the MI300A with a 1000 MHz base and 2100 MHz boost, while the Arc Pro B370 runs at 300 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost. The Intel chip boosts higher but starts much lower. Memory configurations are entirely different in kind, not just capacity. The MI300A uses 128 GB of HBM3 across an 8192-bit bus, while the Arc Pro B370 relies on system shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. These are not competing products in any measurable sense; they occupy separate segments of the hardware landscape.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Instinct MI300A wins in every category where raw throughput matters for compute workloads. Its FP32 output of 61.29 TFLOPS places it far above the Intel Arc Pro B370's 6.144 TFLOPS. Texture rate of 1,915.2 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s confirms that the MI300A is built for sustained, high-volume texture sampling and general compute. Memory bandwidth of 5.32 TB/s against a system-dependent figure for the Intel part means the AMD accelerator can feed its compute units without waiting on shared memory contention. The MI300A also carries 128 GB of dedicated HBM3, whereas the Arc Pro B370 has no dedicated VRAM at all. For large models, large datasets, or any memory-bound operation, the MI300A has a decisive advantage in capacity and bandwidth.

The Intel Arc Pro B370 wins in areas tied to integration and graphics output. It is an IGP with no power connectors, a 25 W TDP, and a 300 MHz base clock that scales to 2400 MHz. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The MI300A lists all APIs as N/A and has no display outputs. The Arc Pro B370 has 10 ray tracing cores, while the MI300A lists no RT cores. Pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s versus 0 MPixel/s means the Intel part can drive display output and raster graphics, while the AMD part cannot. The Arc Pro B370 also uses a 3 nm process node from Intel, compared to the 5 nm TSMC node used by the MI300A. That process advantage does not translate into compute superiority, but it does indicate a newer fabrication approach for the Intel chip. The Arc Pro B370 is also marked as Active in production status, while the MI300A has no production status listed.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Instinct MI300A delivers 61.29 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS. The MI300A is roughly 10 times higher in single-precision throughput.

Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B370 support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Arc Pro B370 lists 10 ray tracing cores. The AMD Instinct MI300A lists no ray tracing cores in the database.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The MI300A uses 128 GB of HBM3 with an 8192-bit bus and 5.32 TB/s bandwidth. The Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth and no dedicated VRAM.

Q: Which GPU has display outputs?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 lists display outputs as "Portable Device Dependent." The AMD Instinct MI300A lists "No outputs."

Q: What is the TDP of each GPU?

A: The AMD Instinct MI300A has a TDP of 750 W. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W.

Q: Which GPU supports modern graphics APIs?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD Instinct MI300A lists all three APIs as N/A.

Specification Differences

The AMD Instinct MI300A and Intel Arc Pro B370 differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The MI300A uses the Aqua Vanjaram chip with CDNA 3.0 architecture, while the Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture. The process nodes differ: 5 nm at TSMC for the AMD part, 3 nm at Intel for the Intel part. Transistor count is 153,000 million for the MI300A, while the Arc Pro B370 lists transistor count as unknown. Die size is 1017 mm² for the MI300A, unknown for the Intel part. The MI300A has 14,592 shading units, 912 TMUs, and 0 ROPs. The Arc Pro B370 has 1,280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs. The MI300A lists no RT cores, while the Arc Pro B370 has 10. Base clocks are 1000 MHz for AMD and 300 MHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 2100 MHz for AMD and 2400 MHz for Intel. Memory clocks are 1300 MHz with 5.2 Gbps effective for AMD, while Intel lists system shared memory. TDP is 750 W for the MI300A against 25 W for the Arc Pro B370. Slot width is OAM Module for AMD and IGP for Intel. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16 for AMD and IGP for Intel. Suggested PSU is 1150 W for AMD, with no value listed for Intel. Release dates differ: 2023-12-05 for the MI300A, 2026-01-26 for the Arc Pro B370. Predecessors are Radeon Instinct for AMD and HD Graphics-WM for Intel.

Architecture Differences

The architecture gap between the two parts is fundamental. The AMD Instinct MI300A is built on CDNA 3.0, a compute-optimized architecture with no ROPs and no graphics API support. It has 153,000 million transistors on a 1017 mm² die, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process, yielding a transistor density of 150.4M per mm². The Intel Arc Pro B370 is built on Xe3-LPG, a low-power graphics architecture integrated into a processor package. It is fabricated on Intel's 3 nm process, though transistor count and die size are recorded as unknown. The MI300A has no display outputs, no power connectors, and no API support, marking it as a pure accelerator. The Arc Pro B370 is an IGP with display outputs dependent on the portable device, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The memory architecture also differs fundamentally: the MI300A uses 128 GB of HBM3 with an 8192-bit bus, while the Arc Pro B370 shares system memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The MI300A has 912 texture mapping units and a texture rate of 1,915.2 GTexel/s, against 40 TMUs and 96.00 GTexel/s for the Intel part. The Intel chip has 10 ray tracing cores, a feature absent from the AMD accelerator. The MI300A lists a pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s, while the Arc Pro B370 lists 48.00 GPixel/s. The power envelope tells the same story: 750 W for the AMD module versus 25 W for the Intel integrated part.

The Verdict

The data indicates these two GPUs serve entirely different purposes. The AMD Instinct MI300A is a data-center compute accelerator with 128 GB of HBM3, 5.32 TB/s of memory bandwidth, 61.29 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, and a 750 W TDP. It has no graphics output, no ROPs, and no API support. Its 14,592 shading units and 912 TMUs are arranged for high-volume parallel compute. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor with 25 W TDP, 1,280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, 10 ray tracing cores, and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It uses system shared memory and has display outputs dependent on the host device. The MI300A is listed with no production status, while the Arc Pro B370 is marked as Active. The release dates place the MI300A in December 2023 and the Arc Pro B370 in January 2026. Users or systems requiring massive memory bandwidth, high FP32 throughput, and dedicated HBM3 should look to the MI300A. Systems requiring an integrated GPU with modern graphics API support, ray tracing, and low power draw should look to the Arc Pro B370. The two parts do not compete on any shared benchmark metric, and the database records no head-to-head results. Each wins in its own domain, with the MI300A dominating compute and memory metrics and the Arc Pro B370 dominating graphics features and power efficiency.