AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER records an average benchmark score of 3075, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB scores 1995. The RTX 5080 SUPER leads by 35.1% in the recorded head-to-head 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test.

Q: How does each card rank against all GPUs in the database?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB sits in the 13th percentile among all GPUs, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER ranks in the 19th percentile. This places the RTX 5080 SUPER higher in the overall distribution of recorded performance.

Q: What memory configurations do the two cards use?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB uses 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus with 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER uses 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB has a TDP of 170 W and uses a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has a TDP of 415 W and uses a single 16-pin power connector, with no suggested PSU listed.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has a boost clock of 2617 MHz, compared to 2450 MHz for the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB. The RTX 5080 SUPER also has a higher base clock at 2295 MHz versus 1941 MHz.

Q: Do both cards support the same API feature levels?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The underlying architectures differ substantially, but the API feature levels match in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs belong to different architectural generations. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB uses the Navi 22 chip built on RDNA 2.0 architecture, part of the Navi II (RX 6000) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER uses the GB203 chip built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the GeForce 50 generation. Both are manufactured by TSMC, but at different process nodes: the AMD card uses a 7 nm node, while the NVIDIA card uses a 5 nm node.

Transistor counts reflect the manufacturing gap. The AMD chip packs 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 51.3M per mm². The NVIDIA chip contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 120.6M per mm². The RTX 5080 SUPER therefore carries roughly 2.65 times the transistor count of the RX 6750 GRE.

Compute resources differ heavily. The RX 6750 GRE 10 GB has 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. It also includes 36 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. The RTX 5080 SUPER has 10,752 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs, plus 84 ray tracing cores and 336 tensor cores. Every major compute block is significantly larger on the NVIDIA side.

Memory architecture diverges as well. The AMD card uses 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, producing 320.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA card uses 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, producing 1.02 TB/s of bandwidth. That is more than three times the memory bandwidth, and the memory bus is 96 bits wider.

The RTX 5080 SUPER also supports a newer PCIe interface, PCIe 5.0 x16, while the RX 6750 GRE 10 GB uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs differ too: the AMD card provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the NVIDIA card provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Clock behavior differs between the two. The RX 6750 GRE 10 GB has a base clock of 1941 MHz, a boost clock of 2450 MHz, and a game clock of 2189 MHz. The RTX 5080 SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz, with no game clock listed. The NVIDIA card runs at higher clocks despite carrying far more transistors.

Physical dimensions also separate the two. The AMD card measures 267 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The NVIDIA card measures 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. Both are dual-slot cards, but the RTX 5080 SUPER is longer and taller.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear performance hierarchy. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER outperforms the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB in the recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test by 35.1%. That is a substantial margin, and it reflects the RTX 5080 SUPER's advantages in shading units, ray tracing cores, tensor cores, memory bandwidth, and transistor count.

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB, however, occupies a different position in the database. It sits in the 13th percentile of all GPUs, with its nearest rivals including the NVIDIA GRID K1 at a 1% delta, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 at a 1.1% delta, the Intel UHD Graphics 770 at a -1.6% delta, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M at a -1.7% delta. Its performance class is close to those older or integrated parts, which frames it as a lower-tier card in the database's rankings.

The RTX 5080 SUPER sits in the 19th percentile, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 at a -2.8% delta, the NVIDIA GeForce 820A at a 3.1% delta, the Intel Arc Pro B60 at a -3.4% delta, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M at a 3.6% delta. Its score of 3075 places it in a higher bracket, though the surrounding rival deltas are small, indicating a localized cluster of similar scoring GPUs.

For users prioritizing the highest recorded 3D performance, the RTX 5080 SUPER is the clear choice from the data. For users constrained by power delivery, the RX 6750 GRE 10 GB draws 170 W versus 415 W, and it requires a 450 W PSU while the RTX 5080 SUPER lists no suggested PSU. The AMD card also uses a single 8-pin connector, whereas the NVIDIA card uses a single 16-pin connector, which may factor into system compatibility.

The benchmark data, not subjective opinion, drives this split: the RTX 5080 SUPER wins the only recorded head-to-head test, and it leads in every major compute and memory specification.

Specification Differences

The table below lists only the fields where the two GPUs differ in the database.

Process Node: 7 nm (AMD) vs 5 nm (NVIDIA)

Transistors: 17,200 million (AMD) vs 45,600 million (NVIDIA)

Die Size: 335 mm² (AMD) vs 378 mm² (NVIDIA)

Transistor Density: 51.3M / mm² (AMD) vs 120.6M / mm² (NVIDIA)

Base Clock: 1941 MHz (AMD) vs 2295 MHz (NVIDIA)

Boost Clock: 2450 MHz (AMD) vs 2617 MHz (NVIDIA)

Game Clock: 2189 MHz (AMD) vs not listed (NVIDIA)

Memory Size: 10 GB (AMD) vs 24 GB (NVIDIA)

Memory Type: GDDR6 (AMD) vs GDDR7 (NVIDIA)

Memory Bus Width: 160 bit (AMD) vs 256 bit (NVIDIA)

Memory Bandwidth: 320.0 GB/s (AMD) vs 1.02 TB/s (NVIDIA)

Shading Units: 2304 (AMD) vs 10,752 (NVIDIA)

Texture Mapping Units: 144 (AMD) vs 336 (NVIDIA)

ROPs: 64 (AMD) vs 112 (NVIDIA)

Ray Tracing Cores: 36 (AMD) vs 84 (NVIDIA)

Tensor Cores: not listed (AMD) vs 336 (NVIDIA)

Pixel Rate: 156.8 GPixel/s (AMD) vs 293.1 GPixel/s (NVIDIA)

Texture Rate: 352.8 GTexel/s (AMD) vs 879.3 GTexel/s (NVIDIA)

FP32 Performance: 11.29 TFLOPS (AMD) vs 56.28 TFLOPS (NVIDIA)

FP16 Performance: 22.58 TFLOPS at 2:1 ratio (AMD) vs 56.28 TFLOPS at 1:1 ratio (NVIDIA)

TDP: 170 W (AMD) vs 415 W (NVIDIA)

Power Connectors: 1x 8-pin (AMD) vs 1x 16-pin (NVIDIA)

Suggested PSU: 450 W (AMD) vs not listed (NVIDIA)

Bus Interface: PCIe 4.0 x16 (AMD) vs PCIe 5.0 x16 (NVIDIA)

Display Outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a (AMD) vs 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b (NVIDIA)

Length: 267 mm (AMD) vs 304 mm (NVIDIA)

Height: 110 mm (AMD) vs 137 mm (NVIDIA)

Width: 40 mm (AMD) vs 40 mm (NVIDIA)

Release Date: 2023-10-16 (AMD) vs 2025-12-31 (NVIDIA)

Launch MSRP: 309 USD (AMD) vs 999 USD (NVIDIA)

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records one head-to-head benchmark between these two cards: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB scores 1995, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3075. The RTX 5080 SUPER wins with a delta of -35.1%, meaning the AMD card trails by that percentage. The gap of 1080 points is the largest single-score difference recorded between the two.

That 35.1% deficit is consistent with the raw compute specifications. The RTX 5080 SUPER delivers 56.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance versus 11.29 TFLOPS for the RX 6750 GRE 10 GB, a roughly 5x advantage in raw floating-point throughput. The RTX 5080 SUPER also has a pixel rate of 293.1 GPixel/s versus 156.8 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s versus 352.8 GTexel/s. Memory bandwidth of 1.02 TB/s versus 320.0 GB/s further reinforces the NVIDIA card's lead.

The RTX 5080 SUPER's nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 at -2.8%, the NVIDIA GeForce 820A at 3.1%, the Intel Arc Pro B60 at -3.4%, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M at 3.6%. The RX 6750 GRE 10 GB's nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GRID K1 at 1%, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 at 1.1%, the Intel UHD Graphics 770 at -1.6%, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M at -1.7%. Neither card's head-to-head result is close to its rival cluster; the two GPUs are separated by a wide performance margin.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER wins the only recorded benchmark, and it leads across every measurable compute specification. FP32 performance is 56.28 TFLOPS versus 11.29 TFLOPS, FP16 performance is 56.28 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio versus 22.58 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, and ray tracing resources are 84 cores versus 36. The RTX 5080 SUPER also has 336 tensor cores, which the AMD card does not list. The 24 GB GDDR7 memory with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth gives it a strong advantage in memory-heavy workloads, and the PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides a newer bus standard.

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB wins on power efficiency in absolute terms. Its 170 W TDP is substantially lower than the RTX 5080 SUPER's 415 W. It also requires a less demanding power setup: a single 8-pin connector and a 450 W suggested PSU, compared to a 16-pin connector with no suggested PSU listed for the NVIDIA card. Its physical size is smaller, at 267 mm length and 110 mm height versus 304 mm and 137 mm, which may fit in more compact chassis. Its launch MSRP of 309 USD is also lower, though the RTX 5080 SUPER's launch MSRP is 999 USD.

The AMD card's nearest rival deltas are all within 1.7 percentage points, indicating it performs close to a cluster of GPUs in its percentile range. The NVIDIA card's nearest rival deltas are within 3.6 percentage points, also a tight cluster but at a higher performance level. The database does not record any benchmark where the RX 6750 GRE 10 GB wins, so the AMD card's advantages are limited to power draw, physical footprint, and connector requirements.