AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded benchmark data presents a sharply divided picture. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB holds a clear advantage in the Geekbench Vulkan compute test, scoring 108,994 points, a figure that reflects strong general-purpose GPU compute performance. This result is the higher of the two scores recorded for the AMD card across the two benchmark suites. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER, by contrast, does not have a recorded Vulkan score in the database, which makes direct comparison on that specific workload impossible.

The single head-to-head benchmark available, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, is won by the NVIDIA card. The RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3,075 points against the RX 6750 GRE’s 2,402 points. This represents a delta of -21.9% for the AMD card, meaning the NVIDIA part delivers a substantially higher result in this modern, graphics-heavy DirectX 12 test. The data suggests the NVIDIA card is optimized for high-end rasterization workloads, while the AMD card’s Vulkan result indicates a different strength in compute-oriented tasks.

Looking at the overall average benchmark scores, the database shows the AMD card at 55,698, while the NVIDIA card’s average is 3,075. This large discrepancy is primarily due to the fact that the AMD card has two benchmark entries (one very high Vulkan score and one lower 3DMark score) averaging out, whereas the NVIDIA card has only a single 3DMark entry. The percentile rankings reflect this data distribution: the AMD card sits in the 87th percentile against all GPUs, while the NVIDIA card is in the 19th percentile. These percentile figures are directly tied to the number and type of benchmarks recorded, not necessarily the raw hardware capability.

For users prioritizing compute-heavy tasks that leverage Vulkan APIs, the AMD card’s recorded performance is the clear winner. For those focused on the specific DirectX 12 3DMark Steel Nomad workload, the NVIDIA card wins the only available head-to-head comparison.

The Verdict

Selection between these two cards depends entirely on which benchmark suite is prioritized. The data shows the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB delivers a Vulkan score of 108,994, which is its dominant result. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER, with its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3,075, wins the sole direct comparison by 21.9%.

The AMD card’s nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, which scores 56,083 on average (a -0.7% delta from the AMD card), and the AMD Radeon 8060S at 55,757 (a -0.1% delta). These figures indicate that the RX 6750 GRE’s average score is very close to that of the RTX 5080, with the AMD card trailing by less than one percent. The NVIDIA RTX 5080 SUPER’s nearest rivals, however, are vastly different: the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 at 3,163 (-2.8% delta), the Intel Arc Pro B60 at 3,182 (-3.4% delta), and lower-tier parts like the GeForce 820A and GTX 860M. This places the RTX 5080 SUPER in a performance bracket alongside entry-level workstation and legacy mobile GPUs according to the recorded average score.

This data paints a confusing picture. The RTX 5080 SUPER’s average score is low only because it has a single benchmark record, whereas the AMD card benefits from having two records. In terms of raw architectural specs, the NVIDIA card has a much larger transistor count (45,600 million vs 17,200 million), more shading units (10,752 vs 2,560), and a higher FP32 throughput (56.28 TFLOPS vs 13.21 TFLOPS). The benchmark results, however, do not reflect this gap because the test suite is limited. The verdict is straightforward: for the recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad test, the RTX 5080 SUPER wins. For all other recorded data, the RX 6750 GRE appears more competitive due to its Vulkan score.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct head-to-head benchmark in the database is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. In this workload, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER scores 3,075 points. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 2,402 points. The delta percentage is -21.9% for the AMD card, confirming a decisive NVIDIA victory.

This result is significant because 3DMark Steel Nomad is a demanding DirectX 12 test that stresses the GPU’s overall graphics pipeline, including shader performance, texture throughput, and rasterization. The NVIDIA card’s higher score aligns with its superior raw specifications: it has 336 texture mapping units (TMUs) versus 160 on the AMD card, 112 render output units (ROPs) versus 64, and a texture rate of 879.3 GTexel/s versus 413.0 GTexel/s. The pixel rate also favors NVIDIA at 293.1 GPixel/s versus 165.2 GPixel/s.

Outside the head-to-head, the AMD card’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 108,994 is its most impressive recorded result. This benchmark leverages the Vulkan API for compute and graphics tasks, and the AMD card’s score suggests strong asynchronous compute capabilities, which is a hallmark of the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The NVIDIA card has no comparable Vulkan score in the database, so no direct percentage comparison can be made.

The database also lists nearest rivals for each card, which helps contextualize their average scores. The AMD card’s average of 55,698 puts it within 0.1% of the AMD Radeon 8060S (55,757) and 0.7% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 (56,083). It is 1.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54,828) and 2.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 (54,247). The NVIDIA RTX 5080 SUPER’s average of 3,075 puts it in a completely different bracket, trailing the Quadro P1000 by 2.8% and the Intel Arc Pro B60 by 3.4%, while leading the GeForce 820A by 3.1% and the GTX 860M by 3.6%. These rival comparisons are based on the recorded data and highlight the disparity in benchmark coverage between the two cards.

FAQ

Q: Which card wins the only direct benchmark comparison?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER wins the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test with a score of 3,075, compared to the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB’s score of 2,402. The delta percentage is -21.9% for the AMD card.

Q: Does the AMD card have any benchmark where it outperforms the NVIDIA card?

A: The AMD card has a Geekbench Vulkan score of 108,994, which is its highest recorded result. The NVIDIA card does not have a Vulkan score in the database, so no direct comparison exists for that test.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB has an average benchmark score of 55,698. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 3,075.

Q: How does the AMD card compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: The AMD card’s average score of 55,698 is 0.1% below the AMD Radeon 8060S (55,757), 0.7% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 (56,083), 1.6% above the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54,828), and 2.7% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 (54,247).

Q: How does the NVIDIA card compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: The NVIDIA card’s average score of 3,075 is 2.8% below the NVIDIA Quadro P1000 (3,163), 3.4% below the Intel Arc Pro B60 (3,182), 3.1% above the NVIDIA GeForce 820A (2,983), and 3.6% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M (2,967).

Q: What are the direct memory specifications of each card?

A: The AMD card has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 1.02 TB/s bandwidth.

Architecture Differences

The two cards are built on fundamentally different architectures and process nodes. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB uses the Navi 22 chip based on RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 7 nm process. The die size is 335 mm² with 17,200 million transistors, resulting in a transistor density of 51.3M per mm². The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 SUPER uses the GB203 chip based on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, also from TSMC but on a 5 nm process. Its die size is 378 mm² with 45,600 million transistors, giving a density of 120.6M per mm², which is more than double the AMD chip’s density.

The compute resources differ substantially. The AMD card has 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, 40 ray tracing cores, and no tensor cores. The NVIDIA card has 10,752 shading units, 336 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 84 ray tracing cores, and 336 tensor cores. This gives the NVIDIA card a theoretical FP32 performance of 56.28 TFLOPS, while the AMD card delivers 13.21 TFLOPS. The FP16 performance also differs: the AMD card achieves 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), while the NVIDIA card achieves 56.28 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio).

Memory architecture is another major differentiator. The AMD card uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 192-bit bus width, yielding 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA card uses 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 1.02 TB/s bandwidth, which is more than double the AMD card’s throughput. Clock speeds are similar, with the AMD card boosting to 2581 MHz and the NVIDIA card boosting to 2617 MHz, but the memory clock differs significantly: the AMD card runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), while the NVIDIA card runs at 2000 MHz (32 Gbps effective).

The cards also differ in connectivity and power. The AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs differ, with the AMD card offering 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the NVIDIA card offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. Power consumption is recorded as 250 W for the AMD card and 415 W for the NVIDIA card. The AMD card uses two power connectors (1x 6-pin and 1x 8-pin) and suggests a 600 W PSU, while the NVIDIA card uses a single 16-pin connector with no suggested PSU listed. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.