Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Comparison

Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile and NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server occupy opposite ends of the GPU spectrum, yet both are active products in the database. The Intel part is an integrated graphics solution for portable devices, built on the Twin Lake chip with Xe-LP architecture and a 10 nm process. The NVIDIA part is a server-class discrete accelerator using the GB202 chip, Blackwell 2.0 architecture, and a 5 nm process fabricated by TSMC. The data shows two products with fundamentally different design goals, and benchmark results, where available, reflect that divide.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Xe-LP architecture, which is Intel's low-power graphics design for integrated solutions. It is part of the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation and is manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. The chip integrates 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 4 raster output pipelines. The GPU operates with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz. Memory is system shared, meaning the GPU draws from the host system's RAM rather than dedicated video memory. The bus interface is a Ring Bus, typical for integrated graphics on Intel processors. The recorded pixel rate is 4.000 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 12.00 GTexel/s. Floating point performance is 384.0 GFLOPS for FP32 and 768.0 GFLOPS for FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. The thermal design power is 6 W, and the slot width is listed as IGP, confirming its integrated nature. Display outputs are portable device dependent. The API support includes DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The production status is Active, with a release date of December 31, 2024.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on the GB202 chip. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 122.9M per mm². The GPU has 24,064 shading units, 752 texture mapping units, and 192 raster output pipelines. It also includes 188 ray tracing cores and 752 tensor cores, which are absent from the Intel part. The base clock is 1590 MHz, with a boost clock of 2617 MHz. Memory is 96 GB of GDDR7 on a 512 bit bus, providing 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is listed as 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective. Pixel rate is 502.5 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 1,968.0 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 126.0 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is also 126.0 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The thermal design power is 600 W, requiring a dual-slot cooler and a single 16-pin power connector. The suggested power supply is 1000 W. The bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16, and display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 2.1b. API support includes DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The production status is Active, with a release date of March 17, 2025. Its predecessor is Server Hopper, and its successor is Server Rubin.

The architecture differences are stark. Intel uses a 10 nm process versus the 5 nm process on NVIDIA. The Intel part has no dedicated ray tracing or tensor cores, while the NVIDIA part has 188 and 752 respectively. Memory architecture differs completely: system shared versus 96 GB GDDR7. The NVIDIA GPU has a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, while the Intel GPU uses a Ring Bus. The Intel GPU is designed for minimal power consumption and integration into portable devices, while the NVIDIA GPU is designed for maximum compute throughput in server environments.

FAQ

Q: What is the process node difference between the two GPUs?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses a 10 nm process from Intel, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server uses a 5 nm process from TSMC.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The Intel GPU uses system shared memory with no dedicated allocation, while the NVIDIA GPU has 96 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512 bit bus.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same DirectX version?

A: Both support DirectX 12, but the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), while the NVIDIA part supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Q: What is the thermal design power for each GPU?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a 6 W TDP, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has a 600 W TDP.

Q: Are there ray tracing cores on either GPU?

A: The Intel GPU has no ray tracing cores, while the NVIDIA GPU includes 188 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the release date for each product?

A: The Intel GPU was released on December 31, 2024, and the NVIDIA GPU was released on March 17, 2025.

The Verdict

The data indicates two products for entirely different use cases. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is for portable devices where power consumption is critical, with a 6 W TDP and system shared memory. It has no ray tracing or tensor cores and delivers 384.0 GFLOPS FP32 performance, which is suitable for basic graphics acceleration in thin-and-light systems. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is for server workloads requiring massive compute and memory resources. It delivers 126.0 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 96 GB of GDDR7 memory, and includes ray tracing and tensor cores. Its 600 W TDP and 1000 W suggested power supply indicate a product designed for data center racks, not portable devices.

Benchmark data exists only for the NVIDIA GPU. It scored 5996 in the 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 test. The nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M with an average score of 6000 and a delta of -0.1%, the AMD Radeon RX 6400 with an average score of 6001 and a delta of -0.1%, the AMD FirePro W4100 with an average score of 5987 and a delta of 0.2%, and the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M with an average score of 5986 and a delta of 0.2%. These delta values show the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is within 0.2% of each rival, meaning its benchmark performance is essentially tied with those older or lower-tier cards in this specific test. The percentile rank for the NVIDIA GPU is 34, placing it below the median of all GPUs in the database for this test. The Intel GPU has no benchmark records, so no direct comparison is possible.

The choice between these two depends entirely on the target system. For portable devices with limited power budgets, the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is the only viable option given its 6 W TDP and integrated nature. For server deployments requiring high compute throughput and large memory capacity, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is the clear choice based on its 126.0 TFLOPS FP32 and 96 GB memory. No other interpretation is supported by the recorded data.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every recorded specification. The process node differs: 10 nm for Intel versus 5 nm for NVIDIA. The transistor count is unknown for Intel but 92,200 million for NVIDIA. The die size is unknown for Intel but 750 mm² for NVIDIA. Transistor density is not recorded for Intel but is 122.9M per mm² for NVIDIA. Base clocks are 300 MHz for Intel and 1590 MHz for NVIDIA. Boost clocks are 1000 MHz for Intel and 2617 MHz for NVIDIA. Memory is system shared for Intel, while NVIDIA has 96 GB GDDR7. Memory bus width is system shared for Intel and 512 bit for NVIDIA. Memory bandwidth is system dependent for Intel and 1.79 TB/s for NVIDIA. Shading units are 192 for Intel and 24,064 for NVIDIA. TMUs are 12 for Intel and 752 for NVIDIA. ROPs are 4 for Intel and 192 for NVIDIA. Ray tracing cores are not present on Intel but 188 on NVIDIA. Tensor cores are not present on Intel but 752 on NVIDIA. Pixel rate is 4.000 GPixel/s for Intel and 502.5 GPixel/s for NVIDIA. Texture rate is 12.00 GTexel/s for Intel and 1,968.0 GTexel/s for NVIDIA. FP32 performance is 384.0 GFLOPS for Intel and 126.0 TFLOPS for NVIDIA. FP16 performance is 768.0 GFLOPS for Intel and 126.0 TFLOPS for NVIDIA. TDP is 6 W for Intel and 600 W for NVIDIA. Slot width is IGP for Intel and dual-slot for NVIDIA. Power connectors are absent for Intel and 1x 16-pin for NVIDIA. Suggested PSU is not recorded for Intel and 1000 W for NVIDIA. Bus interface is Ring Bus for Intel and PCIe 5.0 x16 for NVIDIA. Display outputs are portable device dependent for Intel and 4x DisplayPort 2.1b for NVIDIA. DirectX support is 12 (12_1) for Intel and 12 Ultimate (12_2) for NVIDIA. OpenGL is 4.6 for both. Vulkan is 1.4 for both. Dimensions are not recorded for Intel, while NVIDIA measures 267 mm by 111 mm by 40 mm. Release dates are December 31, 2024 for Intel and March 17, 2025 for NVIDIA. The NVIDIA part has a predecessor and successor, while the Intel part does not.

The only fields where the two match are OpenGL version 4.6, Vulkan version 1.4, and both are listed as Active production status. All other specifications differ, often by orders of magnitude.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two GPUs. The wins count is 0 for each product. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has an empty benchmark array, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has a single recorded benchmark: 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 with a score of 5996. The average benchmark score for the NVIDIA GPU is also 5996, reflecting that single result.

The NVIDIA GPU's nearest rivals provide context for its performance. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M averages 6000, a delta of -0.1% relative to the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server. The AMD Radeon RX 6400 averages 6001, also a delta of -0.1%. The AMD FirePro W4100 averages 5987, a delta of 0.2%. The NVIDIA Quadro K4000M averages 5986, a delta of 0.2%. These deltas indicate that the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server performs within a fraction of a percent of these four rivals in the 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 test. The percentile rank of 34 means the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server sits below the 50th percentile of all GPUs in the database, suggesting that its performance in this particular benchmark is modest relative to the full range of recorded GPUs.

Since the Intel GPU has no benchmark scores, no direct numerical comparison can be made between the two products. The data shows that the NVIDIA GPU, despite its high-end specifications, records a mid-tier benchmark result in the Steel Nomad test, outperforming or matching only a narrow set of older mobile and entry-level desktop GPUs. The Intel GPU's lack of benchmark data means its relative performance cannot be quantified from the database.

The absence of head-to-head results and the empty benchmark array for the Intel part limit the analysis to specification-level differences. The recorded data shows a 126.0 TFLOPS FP32 gap between the two, a 96 GB memory capacity difference, and a 594 W TDP difference. These figures alone determine the intended application spaces for each product.