Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data splits this comparison into two entirely different performance classes. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile shows no benchmark entries in the database, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell carries three recorded scores. The Intel part occupies the 50th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it sits at the median of the database distribution. The NVIDIA part, by contrast, sits at the 98th percentile, placing it among the top 2% of all recorded graphics processors.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,579.5, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 254,116, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 282,631. Its average benchmark score across these three tests reaches 182,109. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no comparable scores recorded, so the data cannot support any direct win for the Intel part in any tested workload.

For use-case separation, the NVIDIA part wins every category where measurements exist: DX12 gaming workloads, OpenCL compute, and Vulkan rendering. The Intel part, with its system-shared memory and integrated design, has no recorded benchmark victories. The data shows a complete sweep for the NVIDIA part, though the Intel part remains the only option for systems requiring a 6 W integrated graphics solution with no discrete power connector.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturers and use different process nodes. Intel builds the Graphics 24EU Mobile on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry, using the Twin Lake chip with Xe-LP architecture from the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation. NVIDIA builds the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell on a 5 nm process at TSMC, using the GB202 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture from the Blackwell PRO W (x000) generation.

Transistor counts differ enormously. The NVIDIA die contains 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, producing a transistor density of 122.9M per mm². The Intel part lists its transistor count and die size as unknown in the database, so no density figure can be stated.

Clock behavior separates the two as well. The Intel part runs at a base clock of 300 MHz with a boost of 1000 MHz. The NVIDIA part starts at 1740 MHz base and boosts to 2377 MHz. Memory clocks diverge completely: the Intel part uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, while the NVIDIA part uses 1750 MHz memory at 28 Gbps effective, paired with 48 GB of GDDR7 on a 384-bit bus delivering 1.34 TB/s.

Execution resources show the scale gap. The Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 4 ROPs. The NVIDIA part has 14,080 shading units, 440 TMUs, and 160 ROPs. The NVIDIA part also includes 110 ray tracing cores and 440 tensor cores, while the Intel part lists no dedicated RT or tensor hardware.

Pixel and texture rates reinforce the difference. Intel delivers 4.000 GPixel/s and 12.00 GTexel/s. NVIDIA delivers 380.3 GPixel/s and 1,045.9 GTexel/s. Floating-point throughput: Intel reaches 384.0 GFLOPS in FP32 and 768.0 GFLOPS in FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. NVIDIA reaches 66.94 TFLOPS in FP32 and 66.94 TFLOPS in FP16 with a 1:1 ratio.

Power and physical design differ fundamentally. The Intel part consumes 6 W, uses an IGP slot width, and has no power connectors. The NVIDIA part consumes 300 W, uses a dual-slot cooler, requires one 16-pin connector, and lists a suggested PSU of 700 W. The NVIDIA card measures 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Intel IGP has no recorded dimensions.

Bus interfaces diverge: Intel uses a Ring Bus, NVIDIA uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs: Intel is portable-device dependent, NVIDIA provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1b. API support shows the Intel part reaching DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. NVIDIA supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The Verdict

The benchmark data supports only one choice for any measured workload. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell holds the 98th percentile, records an average score of 182,109, and beats its nearest rivals by small margins. Its closest competitor, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB, sits 0.9% ahead, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation sits 1.4% ahead, the GeForce RTX 4090 D sits 2.3% behind, and the A100 SXM4 40 GB sits 2.7% ahead. These deltas place the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell in a tight cluster at the top of the database.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile occupies the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero and no nearest rivals recorded. Any system requiring 3DMark Steel Nomad, Geekbench OpenCL, or Geekbench Vulkan results must choose the NVIDIA part. The Intel part exists only for low-power integrated scenarios where 6 W TDP and system-shared memory are the defining constraints.

Release timing also separates the parts. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile released on 2024-12-31, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell released on 2025-03-17. The NVIDIA part lists a predecessor, Workstation Ada, while the Intel part has no predecessor or successor recorded. Both parts remain Active in production status.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher benchmark percentile?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell sits at the 98th percentile among all GPUs, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile sits at the 50th percentile.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each GPU?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has an average benchmark score of 182,109 across three tests. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has an average benchmark score of 0, with no recorded benchmark entries.

Q: How much memory does each GPU use?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell uses 48 GB of GDDR7 on a 384-bit bus with 1.34 TB/s bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile consumes 6 W and has no power connectors. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell consumes 300 W, uses one 16-pin connector, and requires a suggested PSU of 700 W.

Q: Which GPU has ray tracing and tensor cores?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell includes 110 ray tracing cores and 440 tensor cores. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile lists no dedicated RT cores or tensor cores.

Q: How does the NVIDIA part compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell averages 182,109, placing it 0.9% behind the A100 SXM4 80 GB, 1.4% behind the RTX 5000 Ada Generation, 2.3% ahead of the GeForce RTX 4090 D, and 2.7% behind the A100 SXM4 40 GB.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No head-to-head benchmark entries exist in the database for this pairing, so the comparison relies on the recorded scores for the NVIDIA part and the absence of scores for the Intel part.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 9,579.5. This test measures DX12 gaming and rasterization workloads. The Intel part has no such score, so no delta can be calculated.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the NVIDIA part scores 254,116. OpenCL compute workloads favor the NVIDIA architecture's 14,080 shading units and 440 tensor cores. The Intel part, with 192 shading units, has no recorded OpenCL result.

Geekbench Vulkan returns 282,631 for the NVIDIA part. This is the highest of its three recorded scores, indicating strong Vulkan API performance. The Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4 but has no measured result.

The average benchmark score of 182,109 for the NVIDIA part combines these three results. Its nearest rival, the A100 SXM4 80 GB, averages 183,725, a difference of 0.9%. The RTX 5000 Ada Generation averages 184,664, a 1.4% gap. The GeForce RTX 4090 D averages 178,050, leaving the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 2.3% ahead. The A100 SXM4 40 GB averages 187,147, placing the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell 2.7% behind.

These margins show a tightly grouped top tier. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is not the single fastest GPU in the database, but it sits within 2.7% of the A100 SXM4 40 GB and within 1.4% of the RTX 5000 Ada Generation. Its 2.3% lead over the GeForce RTX 4090 D confirms that it outperforms that consumer flagship in the recorded average.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no benchmark entries and no nearest rivals. Its 50th percentile placement reflects its position as a median performer, but with no measured scores, the database provides no quantitative basis for comparing it to the NVIDIA part.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across every recorded specification. Process node: Intel uses 10 nm, NVIDIA uses 5 nm. Foundry: Intel fabricates in-house, NVIDIA uses TSMC. Transistors: Intel lists unknown, NVIDIA lists 92,200 million. Die size: Intel lists unknown, NVIDIA lists 750 mm².

Clocks: Intel runs 300 MHz base and 1000 MHz boost, NVIDIA runs 1740 MHz base and 2377 MHz boost. Memory clock: Intel uses system shared, NVIDIA uses 1750 MHz at 28 Gbps effective. Memory size: Intel uses system shared, NVIDIA uses 48 GB. Memory type: Intel uses system shared, NVIDIA uses GDDR7. Bus width: Intel uses system shared, NVIDIA uses 384 bit. Bandwidth: Intel lists system dependent, NVIDIA lists 1.34 TB/s.

Compute units: Intel has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs. NVIDIA has 14,080 shading units, 440 TMUs, and 160 ROPs. Ray tracing cores: Intel has none listed, NVIDIA has 110. Tensor cores: Intel has none listed, NVIDIA has 440.

Pixel rate: Intel delivers 4.000 GPixel/s, NVIDIA delivers 380.3 GPixel/s. Texture rate: Intel delivers 12.00 GTexel/s, NVIDIA delivers 1,045.9 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput: Intel delivers 384.0 GFLOPS, NVIDIA delivers 66.94 TFLOPS. FP16 throughput: Intel delivers 768.0 GFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, NVIDIA delivers 66.94 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio.

TDP: Intel consumes 6 W, NVIDIA consumes 300 W. Slot width: Intel uses IGP, NVIDIA uses dual-slot. Power connectors: Intel has none, NVIDIA uses 1x 16-pin. Suggested PSU: Intel has none, NVIDIA lists 700 W. Bus interface: Intel uses Ring Bus, NVIDIA uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs: Intel uses portable device dependent, NVIDIA uses 4x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Dimensions: Intel has no recorded length, height, or width. NVIDIA measures 267 mm by 111 mm by 40 mm. Release date: Intel launched 2024-12-31, NVIDIA launched 2025-03-17. Predecessor: Intel has none, NVIDIA lists Workstation Ada. Successor: neither has a recorded successor. Launch MSRP: the NVIDIA part carries a launch MSRP of 5,099 USD; the Intel part has no launch MSRP recorded.

API support: DirectX differs, with Intel at 12 (12_1) and NVIDIA at 12 Ultimate (12_2). OpenGL matches at 4.6. Vulkan matches at 1.4. Production status: both are Active.