Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no shared benchmark runs between the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF. For the NVIDIA part, a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result is recorded, scoring 2910. That places it at the 19th percentile among all GPUs in the database, meaning roughly four out of five recorded graphics processors score higher. The Intel part has no recorded benchmark scores, so its percentile of 50 is a placeholder rather than a measured result.

To contextualize the NVIDIA score, the nearest rivals in the database are all within a narrow band. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB averages 2907, which is 0.1% behind the RTX PRO 4000. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB averages 2913, 0.1% ahead. The Quadro P600 averages 2923, 0.4% ahead, and the GeForce RTX 4010 averages 2893, 0.6% behind. These deltas are effectively noise; the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF sits squarely in the same performance tier as those cards in this specific workload. The data indicates that the NVIDIA card delivers performance roughly equivalent to a mid-range desktop GeForce part in this DX12 test, despite its professional workstation branding and compact form factor.

For the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, the absence of benchmark data means no direct comparison is possible. The recorded specification sheet shows a 6 W integrated part aimed at portable devices, with a 300 MHz base clock and a 1000 MHz boost clock. Its FP32 throughput is 384.0 GFLOPS. The NVIDIA card, by contrast, produces 24.05 TFLOPS of FP32. That is a ratio of roughly 62.6 to 1 in raw compute throughput, though architectural differences and workload characteristics will alter real-world deltas. The Intel part simply has no measured scores to cite, so any head-to-head numerical comparison rests entirely on the NVIDIA side.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from opposite ends of the graphics spectrum. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Twin Lake chip with Xe-LP architecture, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. It is part of the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF uses the GB203 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA chip packs 45,600 million transistors onto a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter. The Intel die size and transistor count are listed as unknown in the database.

The execution resources differ by orders of magnitude. Intel provides 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 4 render output units. NVIDIA provides 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. NVIDIA also includes 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores, neither of which exist on the Intel part. The Intel GPU has no dedicated RT or tensor hardware, so any ray tracing or AI workloads would fall back to general-purpose compute.

Memory architecture is fundamentally different. The Intel part uses system shared memory, with bus width and bandwidth described as system dependent. The NVIDIA card has 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That is a dedicated memory subsystem with fixed capacity and throughput, versus an integrated part that borrows from system RAM and thus varies with the host platform.

The NVIDIA GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both offer OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The feature level difference means the NVIDIA card can run the full DX12 Ultimate feature set, including mesh shaders and DXR, while the Intel part stops at the older 12_1 feature set.

Power delivery and physical design also contrast sharply. The Intel GPU is an IGP with a 6 W TDP and no power connectors. The NVIDIA card is a dual-slot card with a 70 W TDP, no external power connectors, and a suggested PSU of 250 W. The NVIDIA card measures 167 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Intel part has no dimensions listed because it is integrated into a portable device.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF has 8960 shading units. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has 192 shading units.

Q: Does the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile support ray tracing?

A: No. The Intel part has no ray tracing cores listed. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF includes 70 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF?

A: The NVIDIA card has 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus. The Intel GPU uses system shared memory with bandwidth described as system dependent.

Q: How does the NVIDIA card compare to the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB?

A: In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF scores 2910, which is 0.1% behind the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB's average of 2913. The difference is negligible.

Q: What is the TDP of each GPU?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF has a TDP of 70 W and recommends a 250 W PSU.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF boosts to 1342 MHz. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile boosts to 1000 MHz.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification. The Intel part uses a 10 nm process from Intel, while the NVIDIA part uses a 5 nm process from TSMC. The NVIDIA chip has 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die; the Intel transistor count and die size are unknown.

Clocks: Intel base is 300 MHz, boost is 1000 MHz. NVIDIA base is 405 MHz, boost is 1342 MHz. Memory clock for Intel is system shared; NVIDIA runs at 1125 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Memory: Intel uses system shared memory of no fixed size, type, or bus width. NVIDIA has 24 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute units: Intel has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, 4 ROPs. NVIDIA has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores.

Rates: Intel pixel rate is 4.000 GPixel/s, texture rate is 12.00 GTexel/s, FP32 is 384.0 GFLOPS, FP16 is 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1). NVIDIA pixel rate is 128.8 GPixel/s, texture rate is 375.8 GTexel/s, FP32 is 24.05 TFLOPS, FP16 is 24.05 TFLOPS (1:1).

Power and physical: Intel TDP is 6 W, slot width is IGP, no power connectors, bus interface is Ring Bus. NVIDIA TDP is 70 W, slot width is dual-slot, no power connectors, suggested PSU is 250 W, bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x8.

Display outputs: Intel is portable device dependent. NVIDIA has 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b.

DirectX support: Intel is 12 (12_1). NVIDIA is 12 Ultimate (12_2). Both share OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Release dates: Intel launched on 2024-12-31, NVIDIA on 2025-08-10. The NVIDIA card's predecessor is Workstation Ada; the Intel part has no listed predecessor.

The Verdict

The data shows two devices with completely different purposes. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated GPU with a 6 W TDP, designed to accompany a low-power Twin Lake processor in portable devices. Its performance envelope is defined by 192 shading units, a 1000 MHz boost clock, and system shared memory. It has no benchmark scores in the database, so its actual performance cannot be ranked.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a professional workstation card in a small dual-slot form factor. It delivers 24.05 TFLOPS of FP32, 24 GB of GDDR7 with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 70 RT cores. Its single recorded benchmark score of 2910 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 places it in the same performance bracket as the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB and 16 GB, the Quadro P600, and the GeForce RTX 4010. The deltas among those four are all within 0.6%, so the RTX PRO 4000 effectively matches them in this test.

There is no scenario where the Intel part competes with the NVIDIA card on raw performance. The compute throughput gap is roughly 62.6 to 1 in FP32. The NVIDIA card has 46.7 times as many shading units, 23.3 times as many TMUs, and 24 times as many ROPs. It also has dedicated ray tracing and tensor hardware that the Intel part lacks entirely. The Intel GPU's only advantages are its 6 W power draw and its integration into a portable device, which eliminates the need for a separate card, power connectors, or a PSU recommendation.

The verdict from the database is straightforward: the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a capable professional GPU for workloads that fit its feature set, and the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an entry-level integrated solution for basic display and light compute in mobile systems. Neither can substitute for the other.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins in power efficiency and form factor integration. Its 6 W TDP is 11.7 times lower than the NVIDIA card's 70 W. It requires no power connectors, no suggested PSU, and no expansion slot, as it is an IGP on a Ring Bus interface. For a portable device where battery life and physical space are the primary constraints, the Intel part is the only viable option between the two. It also launches earlier, with a release date of 2024-12-31 versus the NVIDIA card's 2025-08-10.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF wins in every performance category. It has more shading units, TMUs, ROPs, and dedicated RT and tensor cores. Its memory subsystem is fixed and fast, with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth versus the Intel part's system dependent throughput. Its pixel rate is 128.8 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s, a 32.2 to 1 ratio. Its texture rate is 375.8 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s, a 31.3 to 1 ratio. Its FP32 output is 24.05 TFLOPS versus 384.0 GFLOPS, a 62.6 to 1 ratio.

The NVIDIA card also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes features beyond the Intel part's DirectX 12 (12_1) support. It has 24 GB of dedicated GDDR7 memory, which is essential for large datasets in professional visualization or AI inference. Its display outputs are four mini-DisplayPort 2.1b connectors, whereas the Intel part's outputs depend entirely on the host device.

For users who need a workstation GPU that fits in a small chassis, the NVIDIA card's dual-slot 167 mm length and 70 W power draw with no external connectors make it a plausible fit for compact systems. Its benchmark score aligns with mid-range GeForce cards, so it is not a flagship performer, but it is a solid professional tier option. For users who only need basic graphics output from a low-power mobile processor, the Intel part is the obvious choice. There is no overlap in their intended use cases, and the recorded data confirms that the NVIDIA card is in a different performance class entirely.