Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents a stark contrast between the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell. The NVIDIA part dominates every measurable benchmark category, leaving the Intel integrated graphics far behind in raw compute and graphics throughput.

The most significant gap appears in the Geekbench OpenCL test, where the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell scores 106,087 points. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, meaning the comparison is entirely one-sided. The NVIDIA GPU also posts a Geekbench Vulkan score of 113,865, further cementing its position as a high-performance workstation part.

In the Passmark suite, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell shows consistent strength across different DirectX versions. It scores 241 in Passmark DirectX 9, 174 in DirectX 11, 122 in DirectX 10, and 80 in DirectX 12. The G3D score of 20,049 and the GPU compute score of 8,396 indicate substantial parallel processing capability. The G2D score of 1,303 reflects strong 2D graphics performance as well.

The average benchmark score for the NVIDIA part is 25,269, placing it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6700M with an average score of 25,633 (1.4% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700 at 25,726 (1.8% higher), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile at 25,740 (1.8% higher). The NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile trails by 2% with a score of 24,763. This places the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell in a competitive position within its immediate performance class.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile holds a 50th percentile ranking with an average benchmark score of zero, and it has no nearest rivals listed. The database contains no performance measurements for this integrated part, which is consistent with its role as a low-power mobile solution. The lack of recorded scores means the head-to-head comparison is defined entirely by the NVIDIA GPU's results.

FAQ

Q: What is the peak FP32 throughput of each GPU?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile delivers 384.0 GFLOPS, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell delivers 17.03 TFLOPS.

Q: How much memory does each GPU use?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses System Shared memory, meaning it borrows from the host system. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 16 GB of dedicated GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth for each part?

A: The Intel GPU's bandwidth is System Dependent, with no fixed figure. The NVIDIA GPU provides 288.0 GB/s.

Q: Which GPU supports hardware ray tracing?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell includes 34 RT cores and 136 tensor cores. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile lists no RT cores or tensor cores in the database.

Q: What are the thermal design power ratings?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is rated at 6 W. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is rated at 70 W.

Q: When was each product released?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a release date of 2024-12-31, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is dated 2025-08-10.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on fundamentally different architectures. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Xe-LP architecture on a 10 nm process from Intel's own foundry, and it belongs to the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation. The chip is called Twin Lake. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm process from TSMC, with the GB206 chip, and it belongs to the Blackwell PRO W (x000) generation.

The NVIDIA GPU is a discrete card with 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.0M per mm². The Intel GPU's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database. The physical form factors differ as well: the Intel part is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with a Ring Bus interface, while the NVIDIA part is a dual-slot card using PCIe 5.0 x8.

Feature support separates the two clearly. The NVIDIA GPU includes 34 RT cores for ray tracing and 136 tensor cores for AI acceleration, while the Intel GPU lists neither. The Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs. The NVIDIA part has 4,352 shading units, 136 TMUs, and 48 ROPs.

The NVIDIA GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes advanced features like ray tracing and mesh shaders. The Intel GPU supports DirectX 12 (12_1), which lacks some of the Ultimate tier features. Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Specification Differences

The specification tables for these two GPUs differ across nearly every field. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell runs at 982 MHz base and 1957 MHz boost. The NVIDIA GPU's memory clock is listed as 1125 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate.

Memory configurations are entirely different. The Intel GPU uses System Shared memory with a System Shared bus width and System Dependent bandwidth. The NVIDIA GPU uses 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Pixel and texture rates show the NVIDIA GPU's advantage. The Intel part produces 4.000 GPixel/s and 12.00 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA part produces 93.94 GPixel/s and 266.2 GTexel/s. FP16 performance on the Intel GPU is 768.0 GFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the NVIDIA GPU achieves 17.03 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio.

Power requirements differ substantially. The Intel GPU has a TDP of 6 W and no power connectors. The NVIDIA GPU has a TDP of 70 W, uses no power connectors, and has a suggested PSU of 250 W. Physical dimensions for the NVIDIA card are 167 mm in length, 69 mm in height, and 20 mm in width. The Intel GPU has no recorded dimensions.

Display outputs also differ. The NVIDIA GPU provides 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b connectors. The Intel GPU's display outputs are listed as Portable Device Dependent.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell wins in every scenario where raw graphics or compute performance matters. Its 17.03 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 34 RT cores, and 136 tensor cores make it suitable for demanding workstation tasks such as 3D rendering, AI inference, and complex CAD workloads. The 16 GB GDDR7 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth supports large datasets and high-resolution textures. The dual-slot form factor and PCIe 5.0 x8 interface indicate a card designed for professional desktop workstations.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins in scenarios where power consumption is the primary constraint. Its 6 W TDP is drastically lower than the NVIDIA GPU's 70 W. The integrated nature of the part, using the Ring Bus interface and System Shared memory, means it requires no additional power connectors or dedicated memory modules. This makes it appropriate for low-power mobile devices where space and thermal limits are severe. Its 50th percentile ranking with an average benchmark score of zero reflects its limited performance envelope, but also signals that it serves a different purpose entirely.

The NVIDIA GPU's benchmark results confirm its position. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,374.5 and the Passmark G3D score of 20,049 point to solid real-world rendering capability. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 113,865 is particularly strong, suggesting efficient use of modern graphics APIs. The Intel GPU has no comparable measurements.

The Verdict

The data directs a clear choice based on intended use. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the only option for users who need substantial compute capability. Its benchmark scores place it at the 70th percentile among all GPUs, and it sits within 2% of several well-known competitors like the AMD Radeon RX 6700M, the AMD Radeon Pro W5700, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile. The 2% lead over the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile shows it outperforms one of its direct professional predecessors.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile serves the opposite market segment. With no benchmark scores recorded and a 50th percentile ranking, it is positioned as a basic integrated solution. Its 6 W power draw and System Shared memory approach suit ultra-portable devices where battery life and thermal headroom take priority over performance. The architecture supports modern APIs including Vulkan 1.4 and DirectX 12 (12_1), so it can run contemporary software, but at modest resolution and detail settings.

The release dates reinforce this split. The Intel GPU was listed for release on 2024-12-31, while the NVIDIA GPU is dated 2025-08-10. The NVIDIA product is also the successor to the Workstation Ada generation, indicating a continuing professional lineage. The Intel GPU has no predecessor or successor listed.

For a workstation user, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the clear selection based on every recorded metric. For an ultra-mobile device where power efficiency is paramount, the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is the appropriate choice. The database shows no overlap in their performance envelopes, so the decision rests entirely on workload requirements and physical constraints.