Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The NVIDIA RTX A1000 dominates the comparison against the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. The database records no head-to-head benchmark entries between these two parts, but the available standalone benchmark results for the RTX A1000 and the architectural data for both products make the performance gap unambiguous. The RTX A1000 delivers an average benchmark score of 34207 across its recorded tests, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores, leaving its average at 0. The RTX A1000 sits at the 79th percentile among all GPUs tracked in the database, while the Intel part sits at the 50th percentile, a substantial gap in relative standing.

The RTX A1000's compute throughput tells the clearest story. Its FP32 performance reaches 6.737 TFLOPS, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile manages 384.0 GFLOPS. That is a 17.5x difference in raw single-precision floating-point throughput. Texture fill rate shows a similar chasm: the RTX A1000 renders 105.3 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s on the Intel part, an 8.8x advantage. Pixel throughput is also heavily lopsided, with the RTX A1000 achieving 46.78 GPixel/s compared to 4.000 GPixel/s on the Intel chip, an 11.7x margin.

The RTX A1000's closest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB with an average score of 34154 and a delta of 0.2%, the AMD Radeon RX 560 XT at 34133 with a delta of 0.2%, the NVIDIA TITAN V at 34355 with a delta of -0.4%, and the AMD Radeon RX 480 at 33997 with a delta of 0.6%. These deltas show the RTX A1000 performs nearly identically to those established desktop and workstation cards, reinforcing that it operates in a completely different performance class than the Intel integrated graphics.

Specific benchmark runs for the RTX A1000 show a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 969, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 52078, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 49574. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no comparable entries in the database, so direct test-by-test comparisons are impossible. The data available nonetheless indicates that the RTX A1000 is a dedicated discrete workstation GPU, while the Intel part is an integrated processor graphics solution with a 6 W TDP, a design point that inherently limits sustained compute performance.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different architectural lineages. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Xe-LP architecture on a chip called Twin Lake, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. It belongs to the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation. The NVIDIA RTX A1000 uses the Ampere architecture on the GA107 chip, fabricated by Samsung on an 8 nm process, and belongs to the Workstation Ampere (Ax000) generation.

Transistor counts and die sizes reflect their different roles. The RTX A1000 packs 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 43.5M per mm². The Intel part's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database. Clock behavior also differs sharply. The Intel chip runs at a 300 MHz base clock and 1000 MHz boost. The RTX A1000 starts at 727 MHz base and boosts to 1462 MHz, with memory clocked at 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective.

The execution resources are vastly different in scale. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile contains 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 4 raster output units. It has no dedicated ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. The RTX A1000 contains 2304 shading units, 72 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, plus 18 ray tracing cores and 72 tensor cores. That is 12x more shading units, 6x more TMUs, and 8x more ROPs, with dedicated hardware for ray tracing and tensor operations that the Intel part lacks entirely.

Memory subsystems are also divergent. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory, with a system dependent bandwidth and a system shared bus width. The RTX A1000 has 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part's memory performance is entirely dependent on the host system's DRAM configuration, which introduces variability that the dedicated GDDR6 on the RTX A1000 avoids.

The RTX A1000 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX A1000's feature set includes hardware ray tracing and tensor cores, which enable workloads that the Intel integrated solution cannot accelerate. The Intel part's 12_1 feature level omits certain DirectX 12 Ultimate capabilities such as mesh shaders and variable rate shading that the RTX A1000 can handle.

Power and physical configuration differ entirely. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated GPU with a 6 W TDP, using a Ring Bus interface and no dedicated power connectors. The RTX A1000 is a single-slot discrete card with a 50 W TDP, no power connectors required, a suggested PSU of 250 W, and a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface. The RTX A1000 measures 163 mm in length and 69 mm in height. The Intel part's dimensions are not listed, as it is an IGP.

The RTX A1000 offers 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile's display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning they are dictated by the laptop or mobile device it is embedded in. The RTX A1000 was released in April 2024, while the Intel part was released in December 2024. The RTX A1000 has a predecessor in the Quadro Turing line and a successor in the Workstation Ada line. The Intel part lists no predecessor or successor.

The Verdict

The data points to a decisive conclusion: the NVIDIA RTX A1000 is the far more capable GPU for any compute-intensive task. Its FP32 throughput of 6.737 TFLOPS is over 17 times the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile's 384.0 GFLOPS. Its dedicated memory with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures consistent performance, whereas the Intel part's system shared memory creates system dependent results. The RTX A1000 also brings ray tracing and tensor cores, hardware that the Intel integrated part does not have at all.

The RTX A1000's 79th percentile ranking among all GPUs, paired with an average benchmark score of 34207, places it alongside the RTX A2000 12 GB, RX 560 XT, TITAN V, and RX 480. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile's 50th percentile ranking with no recorded benchmark scores indicates it occupies a middle-ground position among all GPUs, but that position is based on its integrated nature rather than raw performance.

For users who need a discrete workstation GPU for rendering, machine learning inference, or professional 3D workloads, the RTX A1000 is the clear choice. For users who only need basic integrated graphics in a portable device with minimal power draw, the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile consumes only 6 W versus the RTX A1000's 50 W, making it suitable for ultra-low-power designs. The performance difference is so large that no workload where the RTX A1000 is applicable would reasonably fall back to the Intel part.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA RTX A1000 delivers 6.737 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile delivers 384.0 GFLOPS, a difference of roughly 17.5x in favor of the RTX A1000.

Q: Does the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile support ray tracing?

A: No. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no ray tracing cores listed in the database, while the NVIDIA RTX A1000 includes 18 ray tracing cores.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The NVIDIA RTX A1000 has 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory with no dedicated VRAM.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a 6 W TDP, while the NVIDIA RTX A1000 has a 50 W TDP. The RTX A1000 also suggests a 250 W system power supply.

Q: How does the RTX A1000 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX A1000's average benchmark score of 34207 is within 0.6% of the AMD Radeon RX 480 (33997), within 0.2% of the RTX A2000 12 GB (34154) and RX 560 XT (34133), and 0.4% behind the NVIDIA TITAN V (34355).

Q: What DirectX versions do the two support?

A: The NVIDIA RTX A1000 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA RTX A1000 wins in every measured performance category. Its FP32 throughput of 6.737 TFLOPS dwarfs the Intel part's 384.0 GFLOPS. Its texture rate of 105.3 GTexel/s is 8.8x the Intel's 12.00 GTexel/s. Its pixel rate of 46.78 GPixel/s is 11.7x the Intel's 4.000 GPixel/s. The RTX A1000's 2304 shading units, 72 TMUs, and 32 ROPs provide the execution resources for demanding workloads, and its 18 ray tracing cores and 72 tensor cores enable specialized rendering and AI tasks that the Intel part cannot perform.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins in power efficiency and integration. Its 6 W TDP is a fraction of the RTX A1000's 50 W TDP, making it suitable for fanless or passively cooled portable devices. As an IGP with a Ring Bus interface, it requires no separate card slot, no power connectors, and no additional system power supply headroom. Its system shared memory eliminates the cost and complexity of dedicated VRAM. For a low-power laptop or embedded device where basic display output and light 2D acceleration are the only requirements, the Intel part is the appropriate choice.

The RTX A1000's dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 192.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures predictable performance across memory-intensive applications. The Intel part's system dependent bandwidth means its performance varies with the host system's memory configuration, a source of inconsistency that the RTX A1000 avoids entirely. The RTX A1000 also provides 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs for multi-monitor professional setups, while the Intel part's outputs depend entirely on the portable device's design.

The RTX A1000's release in April 2024 and its position in the Workstation Ampere generation, succeeding Quadro Turing and preceding Workstation Ada, indicates a product line built for professional use. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, released in December 2024 in the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation, is positioned as an integrated solution for the Twin Lake chip. These are products aimed at different segments, and the data confirms the RTX A1000 is overwhelmingly more performant.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile | NVIDIA RTX A1000 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Xe-LP | Ampere |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 8 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | Samsung |

| Transistors | unknown | 8,700 million |

| Die Size | unknown | 200 mm² |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 727 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1462 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 8 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 192.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 192 | 2304 |

| TMUs | 12 | 72 |

| ROPs | 4 | 32 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | None | 18 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 72 |

| Pixel Rate | 4.000 GPixel/s | 46.78 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 12.00 GTexel/s | 105.3 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 384.0 GFLOPS | 6.737 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1) | 6.737 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 6 W | 50 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Single-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | None |

| Suggested PSU | None | 250 W |

| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |

| Length | Not listed | 163 mm, 6.4 inches |

| Height | Not listed | 69 mm, 2.7 inches |

| Release Date | 2024-12-31 | 2024-04-15 |

| Predecessor | None | Quadro Turing |

| Successor | None | Workstation Ada |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 50 | 79 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 34207 |