Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Comparison

Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated GPU built on Intel’s Twin Lake chip, using the Xe-LP architecture on a 10 nm process. The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is a workstation-class discrete GPU based on the AD102 chip, Ada Lovelace architecture, and TSMC’s 5 nm node. The database records no overlapping benchmark results for these two products, so a direct head-to-head comparison must rely on the recorded compute specifications, memory configurations, and the RTX 5000 Ada’s actual benchmark scores. The data shows a fundamental gap in every measurable performance category, from shading throughput to memory bandwidth, which defines the scope of each product’s intended role.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark scores. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 175,286, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 194,041, producing an average benchmark score of 184,664. This places it in the 98th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no benchmark entries, so its average score is zero, and its percentile is 50. The nearest rivals for the RTX 5000 Ada show how competitive its score is: the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB scores 183,725, which is 0.5% lower, while the A100 SXM4 40 GB scores 187,147, which is 1.3% higher. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell scores 182,109, which is 1.4% lower, and the GeForce RTX 4090 D scores 178,050, which is 3.7% lower. These deltas confirm that the RTX 5000 Ada sits at the top of the recorded performance distribution, with only the A100 40 GB exceeding it in this specific measurement set.

Because the Intel part has no benchmark data, the comparison is one-sided. The RTX 5000 Ada’s average score of 184,664 is the reference point; the Intel GPU’s zero score indicates no recorded measurements, not a literal zero performance. The shading unit count tells the story: the RTX 5000 Ada has 12,800 shading units, while the Intel part has 192. That is a 66.7x difference in raw shading hardware. The texture mapping units are 400 versus 12, a 33.3x difference, and the render output units are 176 versus 4, a 44x difference. The RTX 5000 Ada also includes 100 ray tracing cores and 400 tensor cores, while the Intel part lists none. The FP32 compute rates are 65.28 TFLOPS for NVIDIA and 384.0 GFLOPS for Intel, a 170x gap. These figures indicate that the RTX 5000 Ada is designed for workloads that require massive parallel throughput, while the Intel integrated GPU handles basic display and light compute tasks.

The pixel rate for the RTX 5000 Ada is 448.8 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s for Intel, a 112x difference. The texture rate is 1,020.0 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s, an 85x difference. Memory bandwidth is the most extreme gap: 576.0 GB/s for NVIDIA versus System Dependent for Intel, which means the Intel GPU shares system memory with no dedicated bandwidth figure. The RTX 5000 Ada has 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, while the Intel part uses System Shared memory with a System Shared bus width. These specifications confirm that the RTX 5000 Ada is a professional workstation GPU for rendering, AI inference, and scientific computing, whereas the Intel 24EU Mobile is a low-power integrated solution for portable devices.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the RTX 5000 Ada Generation?

A: The database records an average benchmark score of 184,664, based on a Geekbench OpenCL score of 175,286 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 194,041.

Q: How does the RTX 5000 Ada compare to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada scores 0.5% higher than the A100 SXM4 80 GB, which has an average score of 183,725.

Q: Does the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile have any recorded benchmark results?

A: No, the database contains no benchmark entries for the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, so its average benchmark score is recorded as zero.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two GPUs?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses Intel’s 10 nm process, while the RTX 5000 Ada Generation uses TSMC’s 5 nm process.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The Intel part uses System Shared memory with System Dependent bandwidth. The RTX 5000 Ada has 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU includes ray tracing and tensor cores?

A: The RTX 5000 Ada includes 100 ray tracing cores and 400 tensor cores. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile lists no ray tracing or tensor cores.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation is in the 98th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 184,664. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile sits in the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmarks, which means any performance assessment for it is based solely on its specifications. The RTX 5000 Ada is the clear choice for any workload that requires high compute throughput, large memory capacity, or ray tracing support. Its 12,800 shading units, 400 texture mapping units, and 176 render output units provide the hardware foundation for its 65.28 TFLOPS FP32 rate. The Intel part, with 192 shading units and 384.0 GFLOPS, is not comparable in these metrics.

The RTX 5000 Ada’s 32 GB GDDR6 memory with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is suited for large datasets and high-resolution textures. The Intel part’s System Shared memory offers no dedicated bandwidth figure, which limits its utility for memory-intensive tasks. The RTX 5000 Ada also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), indicating a difference in feature level for modern graphics APIs. For users who need a professional workstation GPU with top-tier performance, the RTX 5000 Ada is the only option between these two. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated solution for basic display output and light workloads, but it cannot compete on any recorded performance metric.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every specification field. The RTX 5000 Ada has 12,800 shading units, 400 TMUs, and 176 ROPs, while the Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs. The RTX 5000 Ada has a base clock of 1155 MHz and a boost clock of 2550 MHz, while the Intel part runs at 300 MHz base and 1000 MHz boost. The RTX 5000 Ada’s memory is 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Intel part uses System Shared memory with a System Shared bus and System Dependent bandwidth.

The RTX 5000 Ada has a 250 W TDP, uses a Dual-slot form factor, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 600 W PSU. The Intel part has a 6 W TDP, uses an IGP slot width, and lists no external power connectors. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 for NVIDIA versus Ring Bus for Intel. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for NVIDIA versus Portable Device Dependent for Intel. The RTX 5000 Ada’s dimensions are 267 mm (10.5 inches) in length and 112 mm (4.4 inches) in height, while the Intel part lists no dimensions. The RTX 5000 Ada is a standalone card; the Intel part is integrated into a processor package.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is clear. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Xe-LP architecture on Intel’s 10 nm process, with a die size and transistor count listed as unknown. The RTX 5000 Ada uses Ada Lovelace on TSMC’s 5 nm process, with 76,300 million transistors on a 609 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 125.3M per mm². The Intel part is from the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation, while the RTX 5000 Ada is from the Workstation Ada generation. The RTX 5000 Ada includes 100 ray tracing cores and 400 tensor cores, which are absent from the Intel specification. The FP16 compute rate for the RTX 5000 Ada is 65.28 TFLOPS (1:1), while the Intel part offers 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1), highlighting a difference in precision handling.

The RTX 5000 Ada’s predecessor is Workstation Ampere, and its successor is Blackwell PRO W, which shows its position in NVIDIA’s workstation lineup. The Intel part has no recorded predecessor or successor. The RTX 5000 Ada supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), a higher feature level than the Intel part’s DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 5000 Ada’s memory clock is specified as 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), while the Intel part’s memory clock is System Shared. The RTX 5000 Ada’s pixel rate is 448.8 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s for Intel, and its texture rate is 1,020.0 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5000 Ada Generation wins in every measured and specified performance category. Its average benchmark score of 184,664, 98th percentile ranking, and nearest rival deltas (0.5% above the A100 SXM4 80 GB, 1.4% above the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, 3.7% above the GeForce RTX 4090 D) place it among the fastest GPUs in the database. It wins for ray tracing workloads, with 100 dedicated RT cores, and for AI or tensor workloads, with 400 tensor cores. Its 32 GB GDDR6 memory and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth make it suitable for large model training, high-resolution rendering, and multi-display professional setups. The 250 W TDP and PCIe 4.0 x16 interface indicate a desktop workstation card designed for sustained heavy load.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins in power efficiency, with a 6 W TDP versus 250 W, and in its integrated form factor, requiring no slot or power connector. It wins for ultra-portable devices where battery life and thermal limits are primary constraints. Its System Shared memory means no dedicated VRAM cost, which suits basic desktop compositing, video decode, and light 2D workloads. The absence of benchmark data for the Intel part means the database cannot confirm any performance win for it, but its specifications support the role of a low-power integrated GPU. For users with no need for discrete graphics, the Intel part provides adequate display output with minimal power draw. The RTX 5000 Ada is the definitive choice for professional compute, while the Intel part serves the integrated mobile segment.