Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded benchmark data splits these two adapters into entirely separate performance classes. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile holds the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database, while the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation sits at the 95th percentile. That percentile gap alone positions the Intel part as a basic integrated graphics solution, whereas the RTX 4000 Ada operates in the workstation segment where compute and rendering throughput are the primary metrics.

For the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, the data shows no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is reported as 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed. This means the database has no direct measurements to compare against other GPUs. The lack of scores does not imply failure; it indicates that the integrated graphics solution has not been subjected to the same standardized tests as the discrete workstation card.

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation, by contrast, has two recorded benchmark entries. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 146,593, and in Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 123,842. Its average benchmark score across these tests is 135,218. These numbers place it in the top 5% of all GPUs tracked in the database. The nearest rivals are all professional workstation cards: the NVIDIA A10M scores 135,230 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 scores 135,396 (-0.1% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro W6800X Duo scores 135,774 (-0.4% delta), and the AMD Radeon PRO V620 scores 136,472 (-0.9% delta). The RTX 4000 Ada essentially trades blows with these cards, staying within 1% of each competitor.

The use-case split is stark. The Intel part is designed for portable devices where power consumption is the dominant constraint. Its 6 W TDP and system-shared memory indicate a solution for basic display output, light productivity, and media playback. The RTX 4000 Ada, with its 130 W TDP, 20 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, and 360 GB/s bandwidth, targets professional workloads such as 3D rendering, scientific computation, and AI inference. The data confirms this split: the RTX 4000 Ada delivers 26.73 TFLOPS of FP32 performance versus the Intel part's 384.0 GFLOPS, a 69.6x difference in raw compute throughput. Similarly, the RTX 4000 Ada's texture rate of 417.6 GTexel/s dwarfs the Intel part's 12.00 GTexel/s, and its pixel rate of 139.2 GPixel/s compares to 4.000 GPixel/s.

The Verdict

The data points to entirely different buyers for each product. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated graphics processor for compact, low-power devices. Its 6 W TDP, 300 MHz base clock, and 1000 MHz boost clock are consistent with a chip that prioritizes battery life over performance. The absence of any recorded benchmarks means the database cannot quantify its capabilities relative to other GPUs, but its 50th percentile ranking indicates it sits at the median of all tracked GPUs, which is typical for integrated graphics.

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a single-slot workstation card. Its 95th percentile ranking places it among the top 5% of all GPUs in the database. The recorded Geekbench scores of 146,593 (OpenCL) and 123,842 (Vulkan) demonstrate strong compute performance, and its average score of 135,218 puts it within 1% of four rival workstation cards. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA A10M, matches it exactly with a 0% delta, while the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 trails by 0.1%, the W6800X Duo by 0.4%, and the PRO V620 by 0.9%. These small deltas indicate that the RTX 4000 Ada is competitive with, but not clearly superior to, its direct peers.

Who should pick which: the Intel part suits devices where power draw and physical space are the limiting factors, such as thin laptops or mini PCs. The RTX 4000 Ada suits professionals who need dedicated memory, high compute throughput, and ray tracing capabilities. The RTX 4000 Ada includes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, while the Intel part has none. The RTX 4000 Ada also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), whereas the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1). These feature differences reinforce the workstation positioning of the NVIDIA card.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no head-to-head benchmark results between these two GPUs. The `headToHeadBenchmarks` field is empty, and both `winsA` and `winsB` are 0. This means no direct comparative tests were run. However, the individual benchmark data for the RTX 4000 Ada allows for meaningful interpretation when placed against its nearest rivals.

The RTX 4000 Ada's Geekbench OpenCL score of 146,593 is its strongest recorded result. Its Vulkan score of 123,842 is notably lower, a 15.5% drop. This pattern suggests the card is better optimized for OpenCL workloads in the database's measurements. The average score of 135,218 sits between these two values.

Against its nearest rivals, the RTX 4000 Ada essentially matches the NVIDIA A10M (135,230 score, 0% delta). It trails the AMD Radeon PRO W6800 by 0.1% (135,396), the W6800X Duo by 0.4% (135,774), and the PRO V620 by 0.9% (136,472). These deltas are within measurement noise. The data shows no clear winner among these workstation cards; they all cluster within a 1.2% range of each other.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded scores to compare. Its FP32 throughput of 384.0 GFLOPS and FP16 throughput of 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1 ratio) are the only compute metrics available. The RTX 4000 Ada delivers 26.73 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio). The RTX 4000 Ada's FP32 output is 69.6x higher than the Intel part's. The texture rate difference is 34.8x (417.6 GTexel/s vs 12.00 GTexel/s), and the pixel rate difference is 34.8x (139.2 GPixel/s vs 4.000 GPixel/s). These ratios confirm that the RTX 4000 Ada is in a completely different performance tier.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation?

A: The average benchmark score is 135,218, based on Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan results.

Q: How does the RTX 4000 Ada compare to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA A10M?

A: The RTX 4000 Ada scores 135,218 on average, while the A10M scores 135,230. The delta is 0%, meaning they perform identically in the database's measurements.

Q: What benchmark scores does the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile have in the database?

A: The database records no benchmark scores for the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. Its average benchmark score is 0.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each GPU?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile ranks at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation ranks at the 95th percentile.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two GPUs?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W. The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a TDP of 130 W.

Q: Does the RTX 4000 Ada support ray tracing cores?

A: Yes, the RTX 4000 Ada includes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no RT cores or tensor cores listed.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers, use different process nodes, and target different market segments.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Twin Lake chip with the Xe-LP architecture. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. The transistor count and die size are unknown. The GPU operates with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz. Memory is system shared, with system-dependent bandwidth. The GPU has 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 4 ROPs. It has no RT cores or tensor cores. The pixel rate is 4.000 GPixel/s, the texture rate is 12.00 GTexel/s, FP32 performance is 384.0 GFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 768.0 GFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The TDP is 6 W, and it uses a Ring Bus interface. Display outputs are portable device dependent. It supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The production status is Active, and the release date is 2024-12-31.

The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation uses the AD104 chip with the Ada Lovelace architecture. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The transistor count is 35,800 million, and the die size is 294 mm², giving a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The base clock is 1500 MHz, the boost clock is 2175 MHz, and memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The GPU has 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus with 360.0 GB/s bandwidth. It has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 48 RT cores, and 192 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 139.2 GPixel/s, the texture rate is 417.6 GTexel/s, FP32 performance is 26.73 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 26.73 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The TDP is 130 W, and it is a single-slot card with a 1x 16-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 300 W. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. Dimensions are 245 mm in length and 112 mm in height. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The production status is Active, the release date is 2023-08-08, its predecessor is Workstation Ampere, and its successor is Blackwell PRO W.

Key architectural differences: the Intel part is a 10 nm integrated GPU with a 6 W TDP, while the NVIDIA card is a 5 nm discrete GPU with a 130 W TDP. The RTX 4000 Ada has 32x more shading units (6144 vs 192), 16x more TMUs (192 vs 12), and 16x more ROPs (64 vs 4). The RTX 4000 Ada includes dedicated RT and tensor cores, which the Intel part lacks. The memory subsystem differs fundamentally: the Intel part uses system shared memory, while the RTX 4000 Ada has 20 GB of dedicated GDDR6 with a fixed 160-bit bus. The FP16 ratio also differs: the Intel part uses a 2:1 ratio (768.0 GFLOPS FP16 vs 384.0 GFLOPS FP32), while the RTX 4000 Ada uses a 1:1 ratio (26.73 TFLOPS for both). The release dates are separated by roughly 16 months, with the Intel part launching later.