Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile vs NVIDIA Jetson T4000 Comparison

The Verdict

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile and NVIDIA Jetson T4000 occupy entirely different segments of the graphics hardware landscape. The database positions both at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, but this shared percentile masks a fundamental divergence in capability and purpose. The Intel part is an integrated graphics solution built into the Twin Lake chip, designed for portable devices with a 6 W TDP. The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 is a server-class Blackwell part with a 90 W TDP, 64 GB of dedicated LPDDR5X memory, and a 391 mm² die size. The data indicates the Jetson T4000 is the superior compute platform, delivering 4.700 TFLOPS of FP32 performance against the Intel's 384.0 GFLOPS, a 12.2x advantage. However, the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the Jetson T4000 reports N/A for all three APIs, meaning it is not suited for conventional PC graphics workloads. Users needing a general-purpose graphics processor for consumer applications should select the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, while those requiring high-throughput compute in a server context should choose the NVIDIA Jetson T4000.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins in the domain of standard graphics API compatibility. It supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it functional for mainstream rendering tasks. The Jetson T4000, by contrast, has no DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan support recorded in the database, which restricts it to compute-oriented workloads. The Intel part also wins on power efficiency, with a 6 W TDP compared to the Jetson T4000's 90 W TDP, a 15x difference. This makes the Intel solution viable for portable devices where thermal and power budgets are constrained.

The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 wins decisively on raw throughput metrics. Its pixel rate of 24.48 GPixel/s exceeds the Intel's 4.000 GPixel/s by 6.1x. The texture rate of 73.44 GTexel/s compares to 12.00 GTexel/s, a 6.1x advantage. The FP32 compute of 4.700 TFLOPS versus 384.0 GFLOPS is a 12.2x lead. The Jetson also has a substantial memory advantage with 64 GB of LPDDR5X on a 256-bit bus delivering 273.2 GB/s, while the Intel part uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The Jetson T4000 includes 12 RT cores and 64 tensor cores, features absent from the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. The memory clock of 1067 MHz with 8.5 Gbps effective on the Jetson contrasts with the Intel's system-shared memory clock.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures from different manufacturers. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Xe-LP architecture on a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel, part of the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation. The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 uses the Blackwell architecture on a 5 nm process node fabricated by TSMC, belonging to the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation. The process node difference, 10 nm versus 5 nm, reflects a generational gap in manufacturing technology.

The core configurations differ substantially. The Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 4 raster operations units. The Jetson T4000 has 1536 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, representing 8x, 4x, and 4x increases respectively. The Jetson also integrates 12 RT cores and 64 tensor cores, which the Intel part lacks entirely. The Intel's FP16 performance is 768.0 GFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio relative to FP32, while the Jetson's FP16 matches FP32 at 4.700 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, indicating the Jetson does not rely on reduced precision for throughput gains.

Memory architecture is another major differentiator. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system-shared memory with a system-shared bus width and system-dependent bandwidth, typical of integrated graphics. The Jetson T4000 has 64 GB of dedicated LPDDR5X memory on a 256-bit bus with 273.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The Jetson's memory clock is specified at 1067 MHz with 8.5 Gbps effective. The physical dimensions also differ: the Jetson measures 87 mm by 100 mm by 15 mm, while the Intel part is an IGP with no recorded dimensions. The Jetson uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 bus interface, whereas the Intel uses a Ring Bus. The Jetson has no display outputs, while the Intel's display outputs are portable device dependent. The Jetson's predecessor is Server Hopper and its successor is Server Rubin, while the Intel part has no recorded predecessor or successor. The Jetson T4000 was released in January 2026, after the Intel part's December 2024 release.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher raw compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 delivers 4.700 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is 12.2x higher than the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile's 384.0 GFLOPS. The Jetson also matches this figure in FP16 at 4.700 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the Intel's FP16 is 768.0 GFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.

Q: Which GPU supports standard graphics APIs?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 reports N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, indicating it lacks conventional graphics API support.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference?

A: The Intel part uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth and no dedicated memory size, bus width, or clock. The Jetson T4000 has 64 GB of LPDDR5X memory on a 256-bit bus with 273.2 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 1067 MHz (8.5 Gbps effective).

Q: How do the power requirements compare?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a 6 W TDP, while the NVIDIA Jetson T4000 has a 90 W TDP. The Jetson also has a suggested PSU of 250 W, though it uses no power connectors. The Intel part uses no power connectors either, as it is an integrated GPU.

Q: What are the physical specifications of the Jetson T4000?

A: The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 measures 87 mm in length, 100 mm in height, and 15 mm in width. It uses a PCIe 5.0 x8 bus interface and has no display outputs. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded dimensions and its display outputs are portable device dependent.

Q: Which GPU has ray tracing and tensor core capabilities?

A: The NVIDIA Jetson T4000 includes 12 RT cores and 64 tensor cores. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no RT cores and no tensor cores recorded in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark entries and zero wins for either part in the head-to-head comparison. However, the specification-level comparisons provide a clear performance hierarchy across multiple metrics.

The FP32 compute comparison is the most lopsided. The Jetson T4000 produces 4.700 TFLOPS, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile produces 384.0 GFLOPS. This represents a 12.2x difference in favor of the NVIDIA part. In FP16, the Jetson again produces 4.700 TFLOPS, while the Intel produces 768.0 GFLOPS, a 6.1x gap. The Jetson's FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio with FP32 indicates a design optimized for consistent throughput, whereas the Intel's 2:1 ratio suggests a more limited precision path.

The pixel rate comparison favors the Jetson at 24.48 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s, a 6.1x advantage. The texture rate follows the same pattern: 73.44 GTexel/s for the Jetson versus 12.00 GTexel/s for the Intel, again a 6.1x difference. These consistent ratios reflect the higher shading unit count (1536 versus 192) and the higher clock speed (1530 MHz versus 300 MHz base and 1000 MHz boost) of the Jetson.

Memory bandwidth is another major differentiator. The Jetson T4000 achieves 273.2 GB/s over a 256-bit LPDDR5X bus, while the Intel part's bandwidth is system dependent, meaning it relies entirely on the host platform's memory subsystem. The Jetson's 64 GB capacity dwarfs the Intel's system-shared allocation, which has no fixed size recorded.

The Jetson also leads in feature hardware. Its 12 RT cores and 64 tensor cores enable workloads that the Intel part cannot accelerate. The Jetson's die size of 391 mm² on a 5 nm process provides the physical space for these additional units, whereas the Intel's integrated design shares chip area with the CPU complex on a 10 nm node.

The clock speeds tell a story of different design priorities. The Intel part runs at 300 MHz base and 1000 MHz boost, while the Jetson runs at a constant 1530 MHz for both base and boost. The Jetson's higher sustained clock contributes to its throughput advantages, while the Intel's lower clock aligns with its 6 W TDP.

The API support comparison shows the Intel part is the only one of the two with conventional graphics capabilities. The Jetson T4000 lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which means it cannot run standard graphics applications despite its superior compute specifications. This makes the Intel part the only option for tasks requiring DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, or Vulkan 1.4 compatibility.

The production status for both parts is Active, and both were released within a short window: the Intel part in December 2024 and the Jetson in January 2026. The Jetson T4000 has a recorded launch MSRP of 1,999 USD, while the Intel part has no launch MSRP recorded. The Jetson's suggested PSU of 250 W provides guidance for system integration, while the Intel part requires no such specification due to its integrated nature and lower power draw.