Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Comparison

The Verdict

The database comparison between the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is not a contest of equals. The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) built for efficiency, while the NVIDIA part is a discrete, dual-slot, end-of-life desktop card aimed at high-performance workloads. The recorded data shows the RTX 4070 SUPER holds every benchmark win, with its average benchmark score of 43,223 placing it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile, with an average score of 0.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is strictly for portable, low-power devices. Its 6 W TDP and system-shared memory make it suitable for basic display output and light tasks. The RTX 4070 SUPER is for users who need substantial compute, ray tracing, and high-resolution gaming performance. Its 220 W TDP, 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6X memory, and dedicated ray tracing and tensor cores put it in a completely different performance class. The data indicates that anyone relying on the Intel IGP for 3D rendering or modern gaming would experience a severe bottleneck compared to the RTX 4070 SUPER.

FAQ

Q: How does the average benchmark score compare between the two GPUs?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 43,223, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has an average benchmark score of 0. The RTX 4070 SUPER also sits in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs, versus the 50th percentile for the Intel part.

Q: What is the difference in memory configuration?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER uses 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system-shared memory with a system-dependent bandwidth, meaning it has no dedicated video memory.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER boosts to 2475 MHz, compared to the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile's boost of 1000 MHz. The RTX 4070 SUPER also has a base clock of 1980 MHz, while the Intel part starts at 300 MHz.

Q: Do both GPUs support DirectX 12?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12, but the RTX 4070 SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the physical size difference?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 42 mm in width. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated part with no slot width, listed as "IGP" in the database.

Q: What is the production status of each GPU?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is listed as Active, while the RTX 4070 SUPER is listed as End-of-life. The RTX 4070 SUPER was released on 2024-01-16, and the Intel part was released on 2024-12-31.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different architectural lineages. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Xe-LP architecture on Intel's 10 nm process, built at Intel's own foundry. It is based on the Twin Lake chip, belonging to the HD Graphics-T generation. The RTX 4070 SUPER uses the Ada Lovelace architecture on TSMC's 5 nm process, built from the AD104 chip.

The transistor budget highlights the scale difference. The RTX 4070 SUPER packs 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The Intel part's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database. This alone indicates the NVIDIA chip is a far more complex and powerful design.

The RTX 4070 SUPER includes 56 dedicated ray tracing cores and 224 tensor cores. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no RT cores and no tensor cores listed. This means the NVIDIA card has hardware specifically for ray-traced lighting and AI-accelerated workloads, while the Intel IGP relies solely on its general-purpose shading units.

The Intel part uses a Ring Bus interface, while the RTX 4070 SUPER uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The NVIDIA card also has a 16-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W, whereas the Intel IGP draws power from the system and has no power connector.

Specification Differences

The specification tables show clear divergence across nearly every field. The RTX 4070 SUPER has 7,168 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs. That is a 37.3x difference in shading units, a 18.7x difference in TMUs, and a 20x difference in ROPs.

Clock speeds follow the same pattern. The RTX 4070 SUPER runs at a base of 1980 MHz and boosts to 2475 MHz. The Intel part runs at 300 MHz base and 1000 MHz boost. Memory clocks are also different: the NVIDIA card runs at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed, while the Intel part uses system-shared memory with no fixed clock.

Pixel and texture rates reflect the hardware disparity. The RTX 4070 SUPER achieves 198.0 GPixel/s and 554.4 GTexel/s. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile achieves 4.000 GPixel/s and 12.00 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance shows a 92.4x gap in FP32: 35.48 TFLOPS versus 384.0 GFLOPS. FP16 performance is 35.48 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA card (1:1 ratio) and 768.0 GFLOPS for the Intel part (2:1 ratio).

Power consumption differs by 36.7x. The RTX 4070 SUPER has a TDP of 220 W, while the Intel IGP is rated at 6 W. The NVIDIA card is dual-slot with dimensions of 267 mm x 112 mm x 42 mm, and its display outputs include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The Intel part lists its display outputs as "Portable Device Dependent."

The RTX 4070 SUPER has a launch MSRP of 599 USD. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no launch MSRP recorded.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between these two GPUs. However, the RTX 4070 SUPER's individual benchmark results are extensive and demonstrate its capability across multiple test suites.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RTX 4070 SUPER scores 4,627. In GeekBench OpenCL, it scores 172,795, and in GeekBench Vulkan, it scores 205,624. PassMark results show a GPU compute score of 17,108 and a G3D score of 29,995. DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 tests yield scores of 344, 167, 273, and 110, respectively. The PassMark G2D score is 1,184.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no benchmark scores recorded in the database. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed. This absence of data means the IGP cannot be quantitatively compared in any test.

The RTX 4070 SUPER's nearest rivals provide context for its standing. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43,262, a delta of -0.1% relative to the RTX 4070 SUPER's average of 43,223. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43,268, also -0.1%. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 scores 43,301, a -0.2% delta. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43,667, a -1% delta. These results show the RTX 4070 SUPER is tightly clustered with high-end mobile and workstation GPUs, all within 1% of each other.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, by contrast, has no such data. The database shows zero wins for the Intel part and zero wins for the NVIDIA part in direct comparison, but the recorded benchmark scores make the performance hierarchy unambiguous. The RTX 4070 SUPER delivers 35.48 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel IGP delivers 384.0 GFLOPS. The NVIDIA card's 504.2 GB/s memory bandwidth versus the Intel part's system-dependent bandwidth further cements its lead in any memory-intensive workload.

The RTX 4070 SUPER's ray tracing cores and tensor cores provide capabilities the Intel IGP lacks entirely. For any workload involving ray tracing, DLSS-style AI upscaling, or compute-heavy rendering, the RTX 4070 SUPER is the only viable option between the two. The Intel part is limited to basic 2D acceleration and light 3D tasks, as evidenced by its 4 ROPs and 12 TMUs.

The power envelope tells the final story. The RTX 4070 SUPER consumes 220 W to achieve its performance class, while the Intel IGP operates at 6 W. The data indicates that system designers choosing the Intel part are prioritizing energy efficiency and portability, while those selecting the RTX 4070 SUPER are prioritizing raw performance. There is no overlap in their intended use cases.