Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the primary difference in target platform between the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) designed for compact mobile devices, as indicated by its "Ring Bus" interface and "Portable Device Dependent" display outputs. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is a discrete, dual-slot add-in board with a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, intended for desktop systems.

Q: How do the two GPUs compare in terms of raw compute performance?

A: The RTX 4070 delivers 29.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is approximately 75.9 times higher than the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile's 384.0 GFLOPS. In FP16, the RTX 4070 offers 29.15 TFLOPS (1:1), while the Intel part achieves 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1).

Q: What are the memory specifications for each product?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses System Shared memory with a system-dependent bandwidth. The RTX 4070 features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s.

Q: Which GPU has a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs in the database?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 holds an 81st percentile ranking, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile sits at the 50th percentile. This indicates the RTX 4070 outperforms the vast majority of recorded GPUs, whereas the Intel part is positioned near the median.

Q: What is the difference in power consumption between the two?

A: The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a thermal design power (TDP) of 6 W, suitable for fanless or passively cooled designs. The RTX 4070 has a TDP of 200 W and requires a 550 W power supply, along with a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: Which product has a higher texture and pixel fill rate?

A: The RTX 4070 achieves a texture rate of 455.4 GTexel/s and a pixel rate of 158.4 GPixel/s. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is significantly lower, with 12.00 GTexel/s and 4.000 GPixel/s, respectively.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is built on Intel's Xe-LP architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The chip is codenamed "Twin Lake" and belongs to the HD Graphics-T generation. It integrates 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 4 raster operation units (ROPs). Notably, it lacks dedicated ray tracing cores and tensor cores. The architecture supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU operates with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz, with memory clock tied to the system's shared memory.

In contrast, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 employs the Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The AD104 chip contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². This GPU is equipped with 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 46 dedicated ray tracing cores, and 184 tensor cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The base clock is 1920 MHz with a boost clock of 2475 MHz, and memory runs at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The Ada Lovelace architecture includes hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-driven features via tensor cores, which are absent from the Intel Xe-LP design.

The manufacturing differences are stark: the RTX 4070 uses a more advanced 5 nm node compared to Intel's 10 nm, allowing for a much higher transistor count and density. The Intel part's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown, but its modest specifications suggest a small, low-power design. The RTX 4070's 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores enable features like DLSS and real-time ray tracing, which the Intel IGP cannot support. The Intel GPU's FP16 performance is double its FP32 rate (2:1), a common optimization for integrated graphics, whereas the RTX 4070 runs FP16 at the same rate as FP32 (1:1), indicating full-rate compute across both precisions.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct benchmark comparisons between the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 are not available in the recorded data, as the head-to-head benchmark list is empty. However, the database provides individual benchmark scores for the RTX 4070 across multiple tests, and its average score and percentile offer context for relative positioning.

The RTX 4070 achieves an average benchmark score of 37,648, placing it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P4 (average score 37,628, delta 0.1%), AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 (average score 37,507, delta 0.4%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (average score 38,135, delta -1.3%), and AMD Radeon PRO W6400 (average score 37,157, delta 1.3%). This shows the RTX 4070 sits in a tight competitive cluster, with performance within 1.3% of its closest peers, either slightly ahead or behind depending on the specific rival.

In specific tests, the RTX 4070 delivers 3,854 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 154,858 in Geekbench OpenCL, 174,152 in Geekbench Vulkan, and 26,927 in PassMark G3D. In PassMark compute tests, it scores 14,720. These scores reflect a high-end discrete GPU capable of demanding workloads.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no benchmark scores listed, and its average benchmark score is zero. Its 50th percentile ranking is based on the aggregate database, but without concrete test data, quantitative comparisons are impossible. The data indicates that the RTX 4070 is designed for performance, while the Intel IGP targets basic display and light compute tasks. The absence of benchmark results for the Intel part underscores its role as an entry-level solution rather than a performance contender.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 |

|----------------|----------------------------|--------------------------|

| Manufacturer | Intel | NVIDIA |

| Chip | Twin Lake | AD104 |

| Architecture | Xe-LP | Ada Lovelace |

| Generation | HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) | GeForce 40 |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 5 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Transistors | Unknown | 35,800 million |

| Die Size | Unknown | 294 mm² |

| Transistor Density | Not listed | 121.8M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | 1920 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 2475 MHz |

| Memory Clock | System Shared | 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6X |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 504.2 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 192 | 5888 |

| TMUs | 12 | 184 |

| ROPs | 4 | 64 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | None | 46 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 184 |

| Pixel Rate | 4.000 GPixel/s | 158.4 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 12.00 GTexel/s | 455.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 384.0 GFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1) | 29.15 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 6 W | 200 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | None | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX Support | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL Support | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan Support | 1.4 | 1.4 |

| Length | Not listed | 240 mm (9.4 inches) |

| Height | Not listed | 110 mm (4.3 inches) |

| Width | Not listed | 40 mm (1.6 inches) |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2024-12-31 | 2023-04-11 |

| Predecessor | None | GeForce 30 |

| Successor | None | GeForce 50 |

| Launch MSRP | None | 599 USD |

The specification table reveals a fundamental divide. The Intel GPU is a low-power IGP with shared system memory, no dedicated VRAM, and minimal compute resources. The RTX 4070 is a high-performance discrete card with dedicated GDDR6X memory, a wide 192-bit bus, and a massive lead in shading units, TMUs, and ROPs. The RTX 4070 also supports ray tracing and tensor cores, while the Intel part lacks both. The process node advantage (5 nm vs 10 nm) and transistor density (121.8M / mm² vs unknown) further separate the two products. The RTX 4070 is end-of-life, while the Intel IGP remains active.

The Verdict

The recorded data positions these two GPUs at opposite ends of the performance spectrum. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, with an 81st percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of 37,648, is a high-end discrete graphics card. Its 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 compute, 158.4 GPixel/s pixel rate, and 455.4 GTexel/s texture rate place it firmly in the enthusiast tier. The presence of 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores enables advanced rendering techniques and AI acceleration. The 12 GB GDDR6X memory with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth supports high-resolution textures and complex scenes.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, by contrast, occupies the 50th percentile with an average score of zero in the database. Its 384.0 GFLOPS FP32 and 4.000 GPixel/s pixel rate are orders of magnitude lower. The 6 W TDP and system-shared memory indicate a design focused on power efficiency for basic display output, video playback, and light 2D workloads, not 3D rendering or compute tasks. The lack of dedicated ray tracing or tensor cores means no hardware support for modern graphics features.

Users seeking a discrete GPU for gaming, content creation, or compute-intensive applications should choose the RTX 4070, as its benchmark scores and feature set are designed for such workloads. The Intel IGP is suitable for portable devices where low power consumption and minimal thermal output are priorities, but it cannot match the RTX 4070's performance in any measured category. The RTX 4070's nearest rivals, including the Tesla P4 and RX Vega 56, show that it performs within a narrow margin of its peers, confirming its position as a solid mid-to-high-end option. The Intel part's 50th percentile ranking suggests it is average for an integrated solution, but the lack of recorded benchmarks means its real-world performance remains undocumented in this database.