Intel Arc Pro B70 vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no head-to-head benchmark results for the Intel Arc Pro B70 and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. Both entries carry an empty benchmark array, an average benchmark score of zero, and the same 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs. Without measured frame rates, render times, or synthetic scores, the recorded data cannot establish a direct performance hierarchy. The absence of benchmark data means all comparisons must rely on architectural specifications, memory configuration, and feature support.

The Intel Arc Pro B70 delivers a peak FP32 throughput of 22.94 TFLOPS, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX reaches 24.58 TFLOPS. That difference places the LX MAX roughly 7% ahead in raw single-precision compute, a modest margin that suggests closer performance in compute-heavy workloads. In FP16 with 2:1 ratio, the LX MAX again leads with 49.15 TFLOPS versus 45.88 TFLOPS, a 7.1% advantage. The LX MAX also holds a higher shading unit count at 6144 versus 4096, though the B70 counters with more texture mapping units (256 versus 192) and more raster operation units (128 versus 96).

Memory capacity splits sharply: the B70 carries 32 GB of GDDR6 across a 256-bit bus, yielding 608.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, producing 432.0 GB/s. That 40.7% bandwidth difference and 20 GB capacity gap favor the B70 for large datasets, multi-application workloads, and high-resolution texture sets. Pixel throughput also favors the B70 at 358.4 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, an 86.7% advantage. Texture rate goes to the B70 as well at 716.8 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, an 86.7% lead.

Clock speeds further differentiate the two. The B70 runs a base clock of 2280 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz. The LX MAX lists no base or boost clock in the database. The B70 memory clock sits at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective), while the LX MAX memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The B70's higher memory clock and wider bus combine for the bandwidth advantage noted above.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Pro B70 wins decisively in memory-heavy scenarios. Its 32 GB capacity doubles the LX MAX's 12 GB, and the 608.0 GB/s bandwidth outpaces the LX MAX by a substantial margin. Large-scale rendering, scientific visualization, and AI inference datasets that exceed 12 GB will fit within the B70's frame buffer without spillover. The B70 also leads in pixel fill and texture fill, which benefits high-resolution rasterization and multi-sample anti-aliasing workloads. Its 128 ROPs and 256 TMUs provide 33.3% more ROPs and 33.3% more TMUs than the LX MAX.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins in raw compute throughput. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 exceed the B70's 22.94 and 45.88 TFLOPS respectively. The LX MAX also carries 6144 shading units, which is 50% more than the B70's 4096. For shader-heavy compute tasks such as physics simulations, general-purpose GPU computing, or FP16 machine learning workloads, the LX MAX's higher shading unit count and TFLOPS figures indicate an edge. The LX MAX also uses a 16-pin power connector versus the B70's 8-pin, and it has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the B70 offers one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 outputs.

The LX MAX runs on PCIe 4.0 x16, while the B70 uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The B70's newer bus interface provides double the theoretical bandwidth to the host system, which can matter for data streaming workloads. The LX MAX compensates with a 6 nm process node versus the B70's 5 nm node, though both come from TSMC. The LX MAX is listed as active production status, while the B70's production status is not recorded.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Pro B70 uses the BMG-G31 chip built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, part of the Battlemage Pro Series generation. Its process node is 5 nm at TSMC, with a die size of 368 mm². The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip on the TrueGPU architecture, from the 7G100 generation, fabricated on a 6 nm TSMC node. The LX MAX die size is unknown in the database.

The B70 integrates 32 ray tracing cores; the LX MAX lists no RT core count. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, so ray tracing API features are present on both, but the B70 has dedicated RT hardware while the LX MAX does not disclose such units. Vulkan support differs: the B70 supports Vulkan 1.4, the LX MAX only Vulkan 1.3. That means the B70 exposes newer Vulkan features and potentially better driver efficiency for Vulkan-based titles and compute.

Memory architecture differs fundamentally. The B70 uses a 256-bit memory bus with 32 GB GDDR6, while the LX MAX uses a 192-bit bus with 12 GB GDDR6. The B70's memory clock is 2375 MHz versus 2250 MHz, and the B70's effective data rate is 19 Gbps versus 18 Gbps. The B70's bandwidth advantage is a direct result of both the wider bus and the higher memory clock. The LX MAX's shading unit count of 6144 exceeds the B70's 4096, but the B70 compensates with more TMUs (256 versus 192) and more ROPs (128 versus 96). This architectural split suggests the B70 is tuned for fill-rate-bound rendering, while the LX MAX is tuned for shader-bound compute.

Power delivery differs: the B70 uses a single 8-pin connector, the LX MAX uses a single 16-pin connector. Both cards list a suggested PSU of 550 W and a dual-slot form factor. The B70's TDP is 230 W, the LX MAX's TDP is 225 W, a 5 W difference that is negligible for system planning. Physical dimensions differ: the B70 measures 267 mm long, 110 mm tall, and 39 mm wide; the LX MAX measures 248 mm long, 118 mm tall, and 48 mm wide. The B70 is longer but slimmer, the LX MAX is shorter but thicker.

Display output configurations also diverge. The B70 offers one HDMI 2.1a port and three DisplayPort 2.1 ports. The LX MAX offers four DisplayPort 1.4a ports. DisplayPort 2.1 supports higher bandwidth than DisplayPort 1.4a, which matters for high refresh rate 4K or 8K displays. The B70's HDMI 2.1a provides an alternative connection for TVs and monitors with HDMI input. The LX MAX's four DisplayPort outputs allow more simultaneous displays without adapter dependencies.

The Verdict

The data presents two distinct profiles. The Intel Arc Pro B70 suits workloads that demand large memory capacity, high memory bandwidth, and strong fill rates. Its 32 GB frame buffer and 608.0 GB/s bandwidth handle datasets that the LX MAX cannot fit. The B70's 358.4 GPixel/s pixel rate and 716.8 GTexel/s texture rate deliver 86.7% higher throughput in those metrics. Dedicated ray tracing cores, Vulkan 1.4 support, and PCIe 5.0 x16 further position it for modern rendering pipelines and high-bandwidth host communication.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX suits compute-heavy tasks where raw shader throughput matters more than memory capacity. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 outpace the B70 by roughly 7%. The 6144 shading units provide 50% more parallel execution lanes. For users running FP16 machine learning inference, physics calculations, or shader-heavy general-purpose workloads, the LX MAX's compute figures indicate an advantage. Its 12 GB memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for many workloads, though not for the largest datasets.

The B70's launch MSRP is 949 USD. The LX MAX has no recorded launch MSRP. Neither card has benchmark scores in the database, so the verdict rests on specifications. The B70 is the choice for memory-bound and fill-rate-bound rendering tasks, especially ray tracing and high-resolution output. The LX MAX is the choice for compute-bound workloads that prioritize TFLOPS and shading unit count over memory capacity. The B70's newer display outputs (DisplayPort 2.1 versus 1.4a) and PCIe 5.0 interface provide forward-looking connectivity. The LX MAX's active production status and lower TDP (225 W versus 230 W) offer minor operational differences.

The 50th percentile ranking for both cards indicates they sit at the median of all GPUs in the database, but the lack of benchmark entries means this percentile is provisional. The recorded data cannot assign a definitive winner. Instead, the verdict directs users to match workload characteristics to card strengths.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B70 has 32 GB of GDDR6, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6. The B70 provides 20 GB more capacity.

Q: Which card has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B70 reaches 608.0 GB/s over a 256-bit bus, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX reaches 432.0 GB/s over a 192-bit bus. The B70 leads by 176.0 GB/s.

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, exceeding the Intel Arc Pro B70's 22.94 TFLOPS. The LX MAX leads by roughly 7%.

Q: Do both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both the Intel Arc Pro B70 and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. They differ in Vulkan support: the B70 supports Vulkan 1.4, the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: Both list a suggested PSU of 550 W. The Intel Arc Pro B70 has a TDP of 230 W and uses a single 8-pin power connector. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W and uses a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: Which card has ray tracing cores?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B70 integrates 32 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX does not list any ray tracing core count in the database, though it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate which includes ray tracing APIs.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc Pro B70 | Lisuan Tech LX MAX |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | BMG-G31 | 7G106 |

| Architecture | Xe2-HPG | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Battlemage (Pro Series) | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Die Size | 368 mm² | unknown |

| Base Clock | 2280 MHz | not listed |

| Boost Clock | 2800 MHz | not listed |

| Memory Clock | 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 32 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 608.0 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 4096 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 256 | 192 |

| ROPs | 128 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 32 | not listed |

| Pixel Rate | 358.4 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 716.8 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 22.94 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 45.88 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 230 W | 225 W |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan Version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| DirectX Version | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL Version | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Dimensions | 267 mm x 110 mm x 39 mm | 248 mm x 118 mm x 48 mm |

| Release Date | 2026-03-25 | 2026-03-16 |

| Production Status | not listed | Active |

| Launch MSRP | 949 USD | not listed |