Intel Arc Pro B370 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no benchmark entries for either the Intel Arc Pro B370 or the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and both products show an average benchmark score of zero. Consequently, there are no measured performance deltas, no win counts, and no percentile rankings beyond the identical 50th percentile placement against all GPUs. The data cannot support any claim of superiority for either part in compute, gaming, or professional workloads; the only honest statement is that both units sit at the median of the GPU distribution in the database, a position derived from unspecified historical data rather than current measurements.

The absence of scores means no interpretation of relative strengths is possible. For the Intel Arc Pro B370, the database lists theoretical peak figures: 6.144 TFLOPS FP32, 96.00 GTexel/s texture fill, and 48.00 GPixel/s pixel throughput. For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106, the corresponding theoretical peaks are 15.11 TFLOPS FP32, 236.2 GTexel/s, and 118.1 GPixel/s. These are raw hardware limits, not observed results. A methodical review would note that the NVIDIA part carries 2.46 times the FP32 throughput, 2.46 times the texture rate, and 2.46 times the pixel rate on paper. But without benchmark data, these ratios remain arithmetic exercises, not performance verdicts.

The empty benchmark arrays also mean the wins counter shows zero for both sides. No single workload, whether synthetic, gaming, or compute-oriented, can be cited as a victory for either product. The database records no frame rates, no render times, no power-normalized scores. Any conclusion drawn from the head-to-head section must therefore be provisional, based entirely on architectural specifications rather than empirical results.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge fundamentally at the silicon level. The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses the Panther Lake chip with the Xe3-LPG architecture, built on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 uses the AD106 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. Intel reports transistor count and die size as unknown; NVIDIA lists 22,900 million transistors on a 188 mm² die, yielding a density of 121.8M per mm². The process node difference alone implies distinct power and density characteristics, but the database provides no measured comparison.

The Intel part operates as an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a bus interface of IGP and no power connectors. Its base clock is 300 MHz with a boost of 2400 MHz. Memory is system shared, with the type, bus width, and bandwidth all marked as system dependent. The NVIDIA part is a discrete, dual-slot card using PCIe 4.0 x8, with a 1x 12-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 300 W. Its base clock is 1830 MHz, boost is 2460 MHz, and memory clock is 2125 MHz with 17 Gbps effective. The memory configuration is fixed: 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus delivering 272.0 GB/s.

Compute resources differ sharply. Intel provides 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, 20 render output units, and 10 ray tracing cores. NVIDIA provides 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 24 RT cores, and 96 tensor cores. The Intel part lists no tensor core count. FP16 throughput on Intel is 12.29 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, while NVIDIA achieves 15.11 TFLOPS at 1:1. Power consumption is starkly different: Intel lists a TDP of 25 W, NVIDIA lists 115 W. The Intel part is marked as production status Active with a release date of 2026-01-26; NVIDIA is End-of-life with a release date of 2024-03-31. NVIDIA's predecessor is GeForce 30 and successor is GeForce 50; Intel's predecessor is HD Graphics-WM with no successor listed.

Display outputs also separate the two. Intel relies on portable device dependent outputs, reflecting its integrated nature. NVIDIA provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility does not differentiate them.

The Verdict

The data does not permit a definitive performance verdict. The Intel Arc Pro B370 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 occupy the same 50th percentile in the database, with zero benchmark scores and zero wins each. What the specifications do show is a clear division of roles. The Intel part is an integrated solution: 25 W TDP, system shared memory, IGP bus interface, no power connector, and no fixed memory bandwidth. It targets environments where a discrete card cannot fit, where power draw must stay minimal, and where memory capacity and bandwidth adapt to the host system. The NVIDIA part is a discrete, dual-slot card with its own 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer, fixed 272.0 GB/s bandwidth, and a 115 W TDP. It requires a 300 W PSU and a PCIe 4.0 x8 slot.

For users constrained to an integrated processor, the Arc Pro B370 is the only option in this pairing. For users building or upgrading a desktop with PCIe expansion, the RTX 4060 AD106 offers higher theoretical throughput across every measured metric: FP32, texture, pixel, and ray tracing core counts. The data indicates the NVIDIA part is the more capable compute device on paper, but no benchmark evidence confirms real-world superiority. The Intel part's active production status suggests ongoing availability, while NVIDIA lists the RTX 4060 AD106 as end-of-life. Neither product has a launch MSRP in the database.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ in nearly every specification field. Process node: Intel is 3 nm, NVIDIA is 5 nm. Foundry: Intel is Intel, NVIDIA is TSMC. Transistors: Intel is unknown, NVIDIA is 22,900 million. Die size: Intel is unknown, NVIDIA is 188 mm². Transistor density: Intel is null, NVIDIA is 121.8M per mm². Base clock: Intel is 300 MHz, NVIDIA is 1830 MHz. Boost clock: Intel is 2400 MHz, NVIDIA is 2460 MHz. Memory clock: Intel is system shared, NVIDIA is 2125 MHz with 17 Gbps effective. Memory size: Intel is system shared, NVIDIA is 8 GB. Memory type: Intel is system shared, NVIDIA is GDDR6. Bus width: Intel is system shared, NVIDIA is 128 bit. Bandwidth: Intel is system dependent, NVIDIA is 272.0 GB/s. Shading units: Intel has 1280, NVIDIA has 3072. TMUs: Intel has 40, NVIDIA has 96. ROPs: Intel has 20, NVIDIA has 48. RT cores: Intel has 10, NVIDIA has 24. Tensor cores: Intel has none listed, NVIDIA has 96. Pixel rate: Intel is 48.00 GPixel/s, NVIDIA is 118.1 GPixel/s. Texture rate: Intel is 96.00 GTexel/s, NVIDIA is 236.2 GTexel/s. FP32: Intel is 6.144 TFLOPS, NVIDIA is 15.11 TFLOPS. FP16: Intel is 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1), NVIDIA is 15.11 TFLOPS (1:1). TDP: Intel is 25 W, NVIDIA is 115 W. Slot width: Intel is IGP, NVIDIA is dual-slot. Power connectors: Intel has none, NVIDIA has 1x 12-pin. Suggested PSU: Intel has none listed, NVIDIA is 300 W. Bus interface: Intel is IGP, NVIDIA is PCIe 4.0 x8. Display outputs: Intel is portable device dependent, NVIDIA is 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. Production status: Intel is Active, NVIDIA is End-of-life. Release date: Intel is 2026-01-26, NVIDIA is 2024-03-31. Predecessor: Intel is HD Graphics-WM, NVIDIA is GeForce 30. Successor: Intel has none, NVIDIA is GeForce 50.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more shading units?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 has 3072 shading units, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 has 1280.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each part?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Are both parts compatible with DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both the Intel Arc Pro B370 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the power requirement for each?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 has a TDP of 25 W and uses no power connectors. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 has a TDP of 115 W, uses a 1x 12-pin connector, and requires a 300 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which part is still in production?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 is listed as Active, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 is listed as End-of-life.

Q: How do their FP32 throughput figures compare?

A: The Intel Arc Pro B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 delivers 15.11 TFLOPS FP32, a 2.46 times higher theoretical figure.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Pro B370 wins in power efficiency and integration. Its 25 W TDP is less than one quarter of the NVIDIA part's 115 W. It requires no power connector, no PCIe slot, and no dedicated memory. It uses system shared memory, meaning the host system determines capacity and bandwidth, which suits portable or low-power devices. Its production status is Active, so it remains available for new designs. Its release date of 2026-01-26 places it as a newer product in the database.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 wins in raw compute resources and fixed memory performance. It has more than double the shading units, TMUs, ROPs, and RT cores. It has 96 tensor cores versus none listed for Intel. Its FP32 throughput is 15.11 TFLOPS versus 6.144 TFLOPS. Its texture rate is 236.2 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s. Its pixel rate is 118.1 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s. Its memory is a dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer with 272.0 GB/s bandwidth, independent of host system memory. It provides fixed display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. It uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, suitable for desktop expansion.

For use cases defined by the data: a portable or integrated device with minimal power draw and no discrete graphics slot aligns with the Intel part. A desktop system with a PCIe slot, a 300 W PSU, and a need for dedicated graphics memory aligns with the NVIDIA part. The database records no benchmark wins for either, so all conclusions here derive from specification differences alone.