AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows the AMD Radeon RX 7600 as the clear winner in raw compute benchmarks, though direct head-to-head measurements between the two cards are absent from the database. The RX 7600 holds an average benchmark score of 15171, while the RTX 4060 AD106 has no recorded benchmark scores, resulting in an average score of 0. This disparity means the comparison relies on the RX 7600’s individual test results and its position against other rivals.

In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RX 7600 scores 2310. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 88051, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 34401. Passmark results show 16634 in G3D, 8790 in GPU Compute, 984 in G2D, 226 in DirectX 9, 172 in DirectX 11, 84 in DirectX 10, and 58 in DirectX 12. These figures place the RX 7600 at the 57th percentile among all GPUs, with a 0.7% lead over the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti (average score 15063) and a 0.6% lead over the AMD Radeon Pro 560X (average score 15082). The RX 7600 trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM by 0.2% (average score 15199) and the AMD Radeon 680M by 0.7% (average score 15270).

The RTX 4060 AD106 sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, but with no benchmark entries its performance profile is effectively unmeasured in this database. The RX 7600 therefore demonstrates measurable compute capability across multiple APIs, while the RTX 4060 AD106 offers no comparable scores for direct comparison.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has an average benchmark score of 15171, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 has an average benchmark score of 0, since no benchmark results are recorded for it.

Q: How does the RX 7600 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RX 7600 is 0.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 560X. It is 0.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM and 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon 680M.

Q: What percentile does each GPU occupy?

A: The RX 7600 is at the 57th percentile among all GPUs. The RTX 4060 AD106 is at the 50th percentile.

Q: What is the RX 7600’s best Passmark result?

A: The RX 7600 scores 16634 in Passmark G3D, which is its highest Passmark score. Its lowest is 58 in Passmark DirectX 12.

Q: Does the RTX 4060 AD106 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the RTX 4060 AD106 has no benchmark entries, so its average score is recorded as 0.

Q: What is the RX 7600’s 3DMark result?

A: The RX 7600 scores 2310 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is the only one of the two with measurable benchmark performance. Its 57th percentile ranking and average score of 15171 provide concrete evidence of its capabilities. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106, with no recorded scores and a 50th percentile, cannot be validated for performance from this database.

For users seeking a GPU with documented compute results, the RX 7600 is the clear choice based on the recorded data. The RTX 4060 AD106’s lack of benchmark entries means any performance assessment must come from external sources, not this database. The RX 7600 also offers advantages in several specifications, including higher bandwidth and pixel rate, which are detailed below. The RTX 4060 AD106 counters with a higher transistor count and smaller die size, but without benchmark numbers, these do not translate into verifiable performance wins.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in several key specifications. The RX 7600 uses a 6 nm process node, while the RTX 4060 AD106 uses a 5 nm node, both from TSMC. The RX 7600 has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 65.2M / mm². The RTX 4060 AD106 has 22,900 million transistors on a 188 mm² die, with a density of 121.8M / mm².

Clock speeds differ: the RX 7600 has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2655 MHz, and a game clock of 2250 MHz. The RTX 4060 AD106 has a base clock of 1830 MHz and a boost clock of 2460 MHz, with no recorded game clock. Memory clocks are 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the RX 7600 and 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective) for the RTX 4060 AD106.

Memory bandwidth favors the RX 7600 at 288.0 GB/s versus 272.0 GB/s for the RTX 4060 AD106, though both have 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus. Shading units differ: 2048 for the RX 7600 versus 3072 for the RTX 4060 AD106. Texture mapping units are 128 for the RX 7600 and 96 for the RTX 4060 AD106. Raster output units are 64 versus 48.

Ray tracing cores are 32 for the RX 7600 and 24 for the RTX 4060 AD106. The RTX 4060 AD106 has 96 tensor cores, while the RX 7600 has none listed. Pixel rates are 169.9 GPixel/s for the RX 7600 and 118.1 GPixel/s for the RTX 4060 AD106. Texture rates are 339.8 GTexel/s versus 236.2 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 compute are 21.75 TFLOPS for the RX 7600 and 15.11 TFLOPS for the RTX 4060 AD106, both at 1:1 ratio.

Power specifications differ: the RX 7600 has a TDP of 165 W with a suggested PSU of 450 W and a 1x 8-pin connector. The RTX 4060 AD106 has a TDP of 115 W with a suggested PSU of 300 W and a 1x 12-pin connector. Both are dual-slot cards with PCIe 4.0 x8 interfaces.

Display outputs also differ. The RX 7600 offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. The RTX 4060 AD106 offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The RX 7600 measures 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height, while the RTX 4060 AD106 has no recorded dimensions.

Production status differs: the RX 7600 is Active, while the RTX 4060 AD106 is End-of-life. The RX 7600 has a recorded release date of 2023-05-24, while the RTX 4060 AD106 has a release date of 2024-03-31. The RX 7600 has a launch MSRP of 269 USD; the RTX 4060 AD106 has no launch MSRP recorded.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture, with the Navi 33 chip and the codename Hotpink Bonefish. It belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation and the Radeon RX 7000 series. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 uses the Ada Lovelace architecture, with the AD106 chip, and belongs to the GeForce 40 generation and GeForce 40-series.

The RX 7600 is built on a 6 nm TSMC process, while the RTX 4060 AD106 uses a 5 nm TSMC process. The RX 7600 has 13,300 million transistors, while the RTX 4060 AD106 has 22,900 million. Die sizes are 204 mm² for the RX 7600 and 188 mm² for the RTX 4060 AD106, leading to transistor densities of 65.2M / mm² and 121.8M / mm² respectively.

The RX 7600 has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. The RTX 4060 AD106 has 3072 shading units, 96 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 24 ray tracing cores, and 96 tensor cores. The RX 7600 has no tensor cores listed.

Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RX 7600 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, as does the RTX 4060 AD106. The RX 7600’s predecessor is Navi II and its successor is Navi IV. The RTX 4060 AD106’s predecessor is GeForce 30 and its successor is GeForce 50.

The RX 7600’s display outputs include DisplayPort 2.1, while the RTX 4060 AD106 uses DisplayPort 1.4a. The RX 7600’s memory bandwidth is 288.0 GB/s, and the RTX 4060 AD106’s is 272.0 GB/s. The RX 7600’s pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s. The RTX 4060 AD106’s pixel rate is 118.1 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 236.2 GTexel/s.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 wins in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 performance of 21.75 TFLOPS is higher than the RTX 4060 AD106’s 15.11 TFLOPS. Its pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s also exceed the RTX 4060 AD106’s 118.1 GPixel/s and 236.2 GTexel/s. The RX 7600’s memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s is higher than the RTX 4060 AD106’s 272.0 GB/s, favoring the RX 7600 in bandwidth-sensitive workloads.

The RX 7600 also has more ray tracing cores (32 versus 24) and more ROPs (64 versus 48), which supports higher effective fill rates. Its active production status indicates ongoing availability, while the RTX 4060 AD106 is end-of-life.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 wins in transistor count and density. Its 22,900 million transistors and 121.8M / mm² density exceed the RX 7600’s 13,300 million and 65.2M / mm². It also has more shading units (3072 versus 2048) and includes 96 tensor cores, which the RX 7600 lacks entirely. The RTX 4060 AD106’s lower TDP of 115 W and suggested PSU of 300 W indicate lower power requirements than the RX 7600’s 165 W and 450 W suggested PSU.

The RTX 4060 AD106 also has a smaller die size (188 mm² versus 204 mm²) and a newer release date (2024-03-31 versus 2023-05-24). However, the RTX 4060 AD106 has no benchmark scores in the database, so its real-world performance cannot be confirmed from recorded data.

For users prioritizing documented compute performance, the RX 7600 is the pick. For users prioritizing lower power draw, higher transistor density, or tensor core support, the RTX 4060 AD106 offers those specific advantages, though without benchmark verification.