Intel Arc Pro A60M vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the Intel Arc Pro A60M versus the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. Both entries have an empty benchmark array, and the wins counter shows zero for each side. This means no measured performance comparison exists in the recorded data for these two mobile graphics parts.

The absence of benchmark scores is notable given the scale of architectural difference between them. The Arc Pro A60M carries 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output pipelines. The Graphics 24EU Mobile has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs. That is a 10.7x difference in shading units, a 10.7x difference in TMUs, and a 16x difference in ROPs, all derived directly from the recorded specifications.

Sustained throughput figures reinforce the gap. The Arc Pro A60M delivers 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Graphics 24EU Mobile delivers 384.0 GFLOPS. The Arc Pro A60M is therefore 13.9x higher in raw FP32 throughput. Pixel rate stands at 83.20 GPixel/s for the Arc Pro A60M versus 4.000 GPixel/s for the Graphics 24EU Mobile, a 20.8x difference. Texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s, a 13.9x difference.

Clock behavior also differs sharply. The Arc Pro A60M has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz. The Graphics 24EU Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz. The Arc Pro A60M boosts 30% higher, but its advantage comes primarily from the much larger execution resource pool.

Memory subsystems are fundamentally different. The Arc Pro A60M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, producing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory, with bandwidth listed as system dependent. No comparable bandwidth figure exists for the integrated part.

Neither GPU has any recorded benchmark percentile data beyond the generic 50th percentile ranking shared by both entries. The average benchmark score for both is zero. With no rival data, no percentile comparisons, and no measured scores, the database cannot currently rank these two parts against each other in real workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Intel Arc Pro A60M has 2048 shading units. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has 192 shading units. The Arc Pro A60M has 10.7x more shading units according to the recorded specifications.

Q: How do the memory systems differ?

A: The Arc Pro A60M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory, with the memory type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as system dependent or system shared.

Q: What are the FP32 performance figures for each GPU?

A: The Arc Pro A60M is rated at 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The Graphics 24EU Mobile is rated at 384.0 GFLOPS of FP32 compute. The Arc Pro A60M delivers 13.9x higher FP32 throughput based on these figures.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same DirectX version?

A: No. The Arc Pro A60M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The Arc Pro A60M has a boost clock of 1300 MHz. The Graphics 24EU Mobile has a boost clock of 1000 MHz. The Arc Pro A60M boosts 30% higher.

Q: What is the thermal design power for each?

A: The Arc Pro A60M has a TDP of 95 W. The Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W. The Arc Pro A60M consumes 15.8x more power according to the recorded TDP figures.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different Intel architecture families. The Arc Pro A60M uses the Xe-HPG architecture, built on the DG2-256 chip. The Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Xe-LP architecture, built on the Twin Lake chip. The Arc Pro A60M belongs to the Alchemist (Pro-Series Mobile) generation, while the Graphics 24EU Mobile belongs to the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation.

Process technology differs significantly. The Arc Pro A60M is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The Graphics 24EU Mobile is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. The Arc Pro A60M has 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 42.8M per mm². Transistor count and die size for the Graphics 24EU Mobile are listed as unknown, so no density figure is available.

Ray tracing support is present only on the Arc Pro A60M, which has 16 dedicated ray tracing cores. The Graphics 24EU Mobile has no RT cores recorded. Neither GPU lists tensor cores in the database.

The Arc Pro A60M uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface. The Graphics 24EU Mobile uses a ring bus interface, reflecting its integrated design. Both are listed as IGP slot width, meaning neither is a discrete add-in card. Display outputs for both are listed as portable device dependent.

API support differs at the DirectX level. The Arc Pro A60M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), including hardware ray tracing features. The Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1), which lacks some of the Ultimate tier features. Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

The FP16 compute ratios are identical at 2:1 relative to FP32. The Arc Pro A60M achieves 10.65 TFLOPS FP16, while the Graphics 24EU Mobile achieves 768.0 GFLOPS FP16. This maintains the same 13.9x ratio seen in FP32.

Release timing shows the Arc Pro A60M launched on 2023-06-05, while the Graphics 24EU Mobile launched on 2024-12-31. Both are listed as active production status.

Specification Differences

The Arc Pro A60M and Graphics 24EU Mobile differ across nearly every recorded specification field.

Process node: 6 nm for the Arc Pro A60M, 10 nm for the Graphics 24EU Mobile. Foundry: TSMC for the Arc Pro A60M, Intel for the Graphics 24EU Mobile. Transistors: 11,500 million for the Arc Pro A60M, unknown for the Graphics 24EU Mobile. Die size: 269 mm² for the Arc Pro A60M, unknown for the Graphics 24EU Mobile. Transistor density: 42.8M / mm² for the Arc Pro A60M, null for the Graphics 24EU Mobile.

Base clock: 900 MHz versus 300 MHz. Boost clock: 1300 MHz versus 1000 MHz. Memory clock: 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective for the Arc Pro A60M, system shared for the Graphics 24EU Mobile.

Memory size: 8 GB versus system shared. Memory type: GDDR6 versus system shared. Bus width: 128 bit versus system shared. Bandwidth: 256.0 GB/s versus system dependent.

Shading units: 2048 versus 192. TMUs: 128 versus 12. ROPs: 64 versus 4. RT cores: 16 versus null. Pixel rate: 83.20 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 166.4 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s. FP32: 5.325 TFLOPS versus 384.0 GFLOPS. FP16: 10.65 TFLOPS versus 768.0 GFLOPS.

TDP: 95 W versus 6 W. Bus interface: PCIe 4.0 x16 versus ring bus. DirectX: 12 Ultimate (12_2) versus 12 (12_1). Release date: 2023-06-05 versus 2024-12-31.

Fields that are identical include manufacturer (Intel), slot width (IGP), display outputs (portable device dependent), OpenGL (4.6), Vulkan (1.4), and production status (active). Neither part has a recorded launch MSRP.

The Verdict

The data indicates two GPUs with vastly different performance ceilings. The Intel Arc Pro A60M is a dedicated-class mobile GPU with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, 2048 shading units, and 5.325 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated solution with 192 shading units, shared system memory, and 384.0 GFLOPS of FP32 compute. Every compute metric in the database favors the Arc Pro A60M by an order of magnitude or more.

The power envelope tells a different story. The Arc Pro A60M has a 95 W TDP, while the Graphics 24EU Mobile has a 6 W TDP. The integrated part consumes 15.8x less power according to the recorded figures. For systems where energy draw is the primary constraint, the Graphics 24EU Mobile presents a much lighter load.

The Arc Pro A60M also brings hardware ray tracing through 16 dedicated RT cores, a feature entirely absent from the Graphics 24EU Mobile. DirectX 12 Ultimate support on the Arc Pro A60M versus DirectX 12 (12_1) on the Graphics 24EU Mobile further separates the two in API capability.

The Graphics 24EU Mobile has a newer release date of 2024-12-31 versus 2023-06-05 for the Arc Pro A60M, but the newer part is built on an older 10 nm Intel process while the Arc Pro A60M uses TSMC 6 nm. The integrated GPU uses a ring bus interface, while the Arc Pro A60M uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

With no benchmark scores in the database, the verdict rests on specification analysis. The Arc Pro A60M is the choice for workloads demanding high throughput, dedicated memory bandwidth, and ray tracing support. The Graphics 24EU Mobile is the choice for minimal power draw in integrated scenarios where the 6 W TDP and system shared memory are acceptable. The recorded data cannot support any performance ranking beyond what the specifications imply, but those specifications point to the Arc Pro A60M as the substantially more capable GPU.