Intel Arc Graphics 64EU vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the two GPUs compare in raw benchmark scores?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU has a recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 733, placing it in the 3rd percentile among all GPUs. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, with an average benchmark score of 0, though it sits in the 50th percentile based on its specifications.

Q: What are the closest performance rivals to the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU is statistically tied with the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and Intel Arc Graphics 24EU, both scoring 733 with a 0% delta. The AMD Radeon HD 6470M scores 723 (1.4% slower), while the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M scores 751 (2.4% faster).

Q: Which GPU has more shading units and texture mapping units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU uses 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has 12 times the shading units, 6 times the TMUs, and 6 times the ROPs.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU uses system-shared memory with a system-dependent bandwidth and bus width. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) memory clock.

Q: Which GPU has a higher pixel and texture fill rate?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA delivers 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU delivers 30.40 GPixel/s and 60.80 GTexel/s. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is roughly 6.3 times faster in both metrics.

Q: What is the power consumption difference between the two?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU has a TDP of 65 W and uses an integrated graphics processor (IGP) design. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a TDP of 225 W, requires a 550 W suggested power supply, and uses a 1x 16-pin power connector.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU is built on the Xe-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics (Arrow Lake) generation, using the Arrow Lake-S chip. This is an integrated GPU fabricated on a 3 nm TSMC process with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 73.3M per mm². It uses a Ring Bus interface and relies entirely on system-shared memory, with no dedicated VRAM. The GPU is designed to operate at a 300 MHz base clock and 1900 MHz boost clock, with pixel rate of 30.40 GPixel/s and texture rate of 60.80 GTexel/s. Its FP32 performance is 1.946 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is 3.891 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation, based on the 7G105 chip. It is a discrete, dual-slot card fabricated on a 6 nm TSMC process. While transistor count and die size are not recorded, the architecture is fundamentally different: it uses PCIe 4.0 x16 as the bus interface and features 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with a 192-bit bus. The memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), yielding 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The card has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, delivering 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 384.0 GTexel/s texture rate. FP32 performance reaches 24.58 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance reaches 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio.

The Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech part supports Vulkan 1.3; both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU is an IGP with motherboard-dependent display outputs, whereas the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The Intel GPU has a 65 W TDP with no power connectors, while the Lisuan Tech card has a 225 W TDP with a single 16-pin connector and a 550 W suggested power supply.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU wins in the context of integrated, low-power graphics. Its 65 W TDP and IGP form factor make it suitable for systems where a discrete card is not an option. The 3 nm process node and 17,800 million transistor count indicate a modern manufacturing approach, and the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its benchmark score of 733, while low in percentile, is exactly matched by the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and 24EU, showing consistency across Intel's lower-end Arc lineup. The 3rd percentile placement reflects its position among all GPUs, but for an integrated solution, the data shows a functional entry-level graphics path.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins decisively in raw compute and memory bandwidth. The 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance is roughly 12.6 times higher than the Intel part's 1.946 TFLOPS. The 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is substantial, and the 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate allows for high-resolution output. The dedicated 24 GB GDDR6 frame buffer is a clear advantage over system-shared memory, which is dependent on the host system's memory configuration. The 50th percentile placement among all GPUs, despite having no recorded benchmark scores, suggests the specification-based ranking places it in the middle of the field. The dual-slot design, 268 mm length, and 112 mm height indicate a full-size discrete card intended for desktop systems with adequate cooling and power delivery.

The Intel GPU wins on process efficiency and integration: it uses a 3 nm node, has no external power requirement, and fits into the Ring Bus architecture of the Arrow Lake-S platform. The Lisuan Tech card wins on every performance metric recorded, including shading units, TMUs, ROPs, fill rates, TFLOPS, and memory bandwidth. The Intel part also wins on Vulkan API version support (1.4 vs 1.3), though the Lisuan Tech card supports the same DirectX 12 Ultimate and OpenGL 4.6.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU uses a 3 nm process, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses a 6 nm process, both from TSMC. The Intel chip is the Arrow Lake-S with 17,800 million transistors on a 243 mm² die; the Lisuan Tech chip is the 7G105 with unknown transistor count and die size. The architectures are Xe-LPG versus TrueGPU, and generations are Arc Graphics (Arrow Lake) versus 7G100.

Clock speeds differ significantly: the Intel part has a 300 MHz base and 1900 MHz boost, while the Lisuan Tech part has no recorded base or boost clocks but a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Intel GPU uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, whereas the Lisuan Tech card has 24 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s fixed bandwidth.

Compute resources differ by an order of magnitude: 512 versus 6144 shading units, 32 versus 192 TMUs, and 16 versus 96 ROPs. Pixel rate is 30.40 versus 192.0 GPixel/s, texture rate is 60.80 versus 384.0 GTexel/s, FP32 is 1.946 versus 24.58 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 3.891 versus 49.15 TFLOPS (both at 2:1 ratio).

Power and physical specifications also diverge. The Intel GPU has a 65 W TDP, is an IGP, and has no power connectors or suggested PSU. The Lisuan Tech card has a 225 W TDP, is dual-slot, requires a 1x 16-pin connector, and lists a 550 W suggested power supply. The bus interface is Ring Bus for Intel versus PCIe 4.0 x16 for Lisuan Tech. Display outputs are motherboard-dependent for the Intel part versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for the Lisuan Tech card. Dimensions are not recorded for the Intel IGP, while the Lisuan Tech card measures 268 mm by 112 mm by 40 mm. Release dates differ: the Intel GPU launched on 2024-10-23, and the Lisuan Tech card is dated 2026-03-16. The Intel part has a predecessor in HD Graphics, while the Lisuan Tech card has no recorded predecessor or successor.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between these two GPUs, and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no recorded benchmark scores. The only benchmark data available is the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 733.

Comparing the Intel score against its nearest rivals provides context for its performance tier. The Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and 24EU each score 733, resulting in a 0% delta, meaning these three Intel parts perform identically in the recorded test. The AMD Radeon HD 6470M scores 723, which is 1.4% lower than the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M scores 751, which is 2.4% higher than the Intel part.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA's 50th percentile placement, despite having no benchmark scores, indicates the database ranks it based on its specification profile. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU sits in the 3rd percentile, meaning 97% of recorded GPUs outperform it. The Lisuan Tech card's 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 performance versus the Intel part's 1.946 TFLOPS represents a 12.6x advantage in compute throughput. The 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth compared to system-dependent shared memory is a fundamental difference, as the discrete card's bandwidth is fixed and independent of host memory speed.

The fill rate comparison shows the Lisuan Tech card delivers 192.0 GPixel/s versus 30.40 GPixel/s for the Intel part, a 6.3x advantage. Texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 60.80 GTexel/s, also a 6.3x difference. The 24 GB GDDR6 memory capacity versus system-shared memory means the Lisuan Tech card can hold far more graphics data locally, avoiding the latency and bandwidth bottlenecks of shared memory architectures.

The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU's advantage lies in its 3 nm process node, which is smaller than the 6 nm node used by the Lisuan Tech card, and its lower 65 W TDP. The Lisuan Tech card's 225 W TDP is 3.5 times higher, requiring a 550 W power supply. The Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4, a newer API version than the Lisuan Tech card's Vulkan 1.3, though both support DirectX 12 Ultimate and OpenGL 4.6. The nearest rival data shows the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU is tightly clustered with other low-end Intel Arc parts, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has no nearest rivals recorded, indicating its specification profile does not closely match any other GPU in the database.