Intel Arc Graphics 64EU vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Intel Arc Graphics 64EU and Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 occupy opposite ends of the hardware spectrum. The Intel part is an integrated graphics processor built into Arrow Lake-S desktop chips, while the LX 7G100 is a standalone dual-slot expansion card with its own dedicated memory. The recorded data shows a clear performance gap, but the two products serve entirely different physical and architectural roles.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU wins in integration and platform simplicity. It is an IGP with a Ring Bus interface, meaning it pulls system memory for its frame buffer and requires no separate power connectors. Its 65 W TDP fits within the host processor's power envelope. The data shows it is designed for systems where a discrete card is unnecessary or impractical. Its benchmark score of 733 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 places it at the 3rd percentile of all GPUs in the database, which indicates it delivers entry-level 3D capability.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins in raw throughput and memory capacity. It provides 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, producing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its FP32 compute rate is 24.58 TFLOPS, its pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s. The Intel IGP manages 1.946 TFLOPS FP32, 30.40 GPixel/s, and 60.80 GTexel/s. The LX 7G100 also holds a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, a substantial step above the Intel part's 3rd percentile. The discrete card requires a 550 W suggested PSU and a single 8-pin connector, which points to a system with substantial power delivery headroom.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU uses the Xe-LPG architecture on TSMC's 3 nm process. Its chip, Arrow Lake-S, integrates 17,800 million transistors across a 243 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 73.3M per mm². The GPU runs at a 300 MHz base clock and 1900 MHz boost. It has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 raster output units. Memory is system shared, with bandwidth classified as system dependent. Its FP16 rate is 3.891 TFLOPS, achieved via a 2:1 ratio relative to FP32.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the TrueGPU architecture on TSMC's 6 nm process. Its chip is labeled 7G106. The database does not record transistor count, die size, or transistor density for this part. It has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, with 18 Gbps effective data rate. The FP16 rate is 49.15 TFLOPS, also at a 2:1 ratio. The LX 7G100 uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface, while the Intel IGP connects via Ring Bus. Display outputs differ as well: the Intel part's outputs are motherboard dependent, whereas the LX 7G100 provides four DisplayPort 1.4a connectors.

The API support shows a minor divergence. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Intel part supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. Process node and physical design separate them further: 3 nm versus 6 nm, IGP versus dual-slot card, 65 W versus 225 W.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between these two products. The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU has a single recorded benchmark: 733 in 3Dmark Steel Nomad DX12, which is also its average score. The LX 7G100 has no recorded benchmark scores, so its average is listed as 0. Its percentile ranking of 50 is based on the broader database distribution, not on a specific test run logged for this comparison.

The Intel part's nearest rivals place it in a narrow band. The Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and 24EU both score 733, a 0% delta. The AMD Radeon HD 6470M scores 723, putting the 64EU 1.4% ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M scores 751, meaning the 64EU trails by 2.4%. This positioning shows the 64EU is competitive only with integrated or very low-end mobile parts from over a decade ago. The LX 7G100 has no nearest rivals listed, so its direct competitive set is not defined in the database.

The compute ratios tell a straightforward story. The LX 7G100 delivers roughly 12.6 times the FP32 throughput of the Intel IGP, based on 24.58 TFLOPS versus 1.946 TFLOPS. Its pixel rate is about 6.3 times higher, and its texture rate is about 6.3 times higher. Memory bandwidth is 432.0 GB/s versus system dependent, which is not a directly comparable number but indicates a massive advantage for the discrete card.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU is appropriate for office work, media playback, and light 3D tasks where no expansion slot is available or where power draw must stay minimal. Its 3rd percentile ranking and its benchmark parity with the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and 24EU confirm it is not built for demanding gaming or compute workloads. A 733 score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 places it in the same bracket as the AMD Radeon HD 6470M and just below the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M, both of which are legacy mobile parts.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is the choice for workloads that need dedicated memory, high bandwidth, and substantial shader throughput. Its 12 GB GDDR6 buffer, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 make it a fundamentally different class of hardware. The 50th percentile ranking places it in the middle of the database's GPU distribution, which is far beyond the Intel part's reach. The 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU confirm it is meant for a full desktop build with a discrete power supply.

There is no scenario in the recorded data where the Intel IGP outperforms the LX 7G100. The only advantages for the Intel part are integration, lower power draw, and a smaller physical footprint. The LX 7G100's dual-slot size, 294 mm length, and 1x 8-pin power connector make it unsuitable for compact or low-power systems. Users should select based on the system form factor and workload requirements, not on benchmark parity, because no such parity exists.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 in FP32 compute than the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU?

A: The LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, while the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU delivers 1.946 TFLOPS. That is roughly 12.6 times higher throughput for the LX 7G100.

Q: What is the benchmark score for the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU scores 733 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, and that score is also its average benchmark score. Its percentile ranking among all GPUs is 3.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the LX 7G100, so its average benchmark score is recorded as 0. Its percentile ranking is 50 based on the broader database distribution.

Q: What memory configuration does the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 use?

A: The LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz and 18 Gbps effective data rate. This yields 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the Intel Arc Graphics 64EU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU scores the same 733 as the Intel Arc Graphics 32EU and 24EU, a 0% delta. It is 1.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon HD 6470M (723) and 2.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M (751).

Q: What are the power requirements for each product?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 64EU has a 65 W TDP and no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a 225 W TDP and requires one 8-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc Graphics 64EU | Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Architecture | Xe-LPG | TrueGPU |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Transistors | 17,800 million | unknown |

| Die Size | 243 mm² | unknown |

| Transistor Density | 73.3M / mm² | null |

| Base Clock | 300 MHz | null |

| Boost Clock | 1900 MHz | null |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 512 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 32 | 192 |

| ROPs | 16 | 96 |

| Pixel Rate | 30.40 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 60.80 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 1.946 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 3.891 TFLOPS (2:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 65 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | null | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Motherboard Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | null | 294 mm 11.6 inches |

| Height | null | 120 mm 4.7 inches |

| Width | null | 49 mm 1.9 inches |

| Release Date | 2024-10-23 | 2026-06-17 |

| Avg Benchmark Score | 733 | 0 |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 3 | 50 |