Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA. Both entries show zero benchmark scores, zero average benchmark scores, and zero wins in the comparison database. The absence of measured performance data means any direct numerical comparison of gaming frame rates, compute workloads, or synthetic tests cannot be derived from the database at this time.

What can be compared directly are the theoretical throughput figures recorded in the specifications. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile delivers 3.942 TFLOPS. That places the LX ULTRA at roughly 6.2 times the raw FP32 throughput of the Intel part, a figure that comes directly from dividing the recorded specifications. In FP16, the LX ULTRA reaches 49.15 TFLOPS against 7.885 TFLOPS for the Intel iGPU, again a 6.2x gap on paper.

Pixel throughput shows a similar separation. The LX ULTRA records 192.0 GPixel/s, while the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile records 52.80 GPixel/s. Texture throughput follows the same pattern: 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX ULTRA versus 123.2 GTexel/s for the Intel part. These figures represent the maximum theoretical fill rates based on the recorded clock speeds and unit counts, not measured application performance.

The memory subsystem is another major divider. The LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile uses system shared memory with bandwidth listed as system dependent, so no fixed bandwidth number exists in the database for comparison. The LX ULTRA's dedicated memory bandwidth is a concrete advantage in bandwidth-bound workloads, though the Intel part can scale with the host system's memory configuration.

Both products sit at the 50th percentile in the database's ranking of all GPUs, and both have an average benchmark score of zero. The percentile figure indicates that neither product has enough recorded benchmark data to differentiate them from the database midpoint.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile wins in integration and power envelope. It is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 65 W TDP, designed for the Meteor Lake mobile platform. Its system shared memory approach requires no dedicated VRAM allocation, and its portable device dependent display outputs make it suitable for laptops and compact systems. The Xe-LPG architecture with 896 shading units, 56 texture mapping units, and 24 ROPs is a mobile-first design. Its 10 nm Intel process node and Ring Bus interface tie it directly into the Meteor Lake processor package. For users who need graphics capability in a thin-and-light system without a discrete card, this is the only option of the two that fits that use case.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA wins in raw compute, memory capacity, and memory bandwidth. Its 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs are 6.9x, 3.4x, and 4.0x the Intel part's counts, respectively. The 24 GB GDDR6 frame buffer is a massive capacity advantage over system shared memory, and the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is a fixed, dedicated resource. The 225 W TDP and dual-slot cooling requirement indicate a desktop-oriented discrete card, confirmed by the PCIe 4.0 x16 bus interface and 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The LX ULTRA also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), so the LX ULTRA includes the feature level required for the latest DirectX 12 Ultimate effects.

The architecture names reflect different design philosophies. The LX ULTRA's TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process with 7G105 chip and 7G100 generation is positioned as a standalone high-throughput accelerator. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile's Xe-LPG architecture on a 10 nm Intel process with Meteor Lake chip is a power-efficient integrated solution. The LX ULTRA's 16-pin power connector and 550 W suggested PSU indicate a card that expects a dedicated power delivery system, whereas the Intel part draws from the parent processor's platform power.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the recorded specifications, the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA is the stronger performer in every metric where both products have fixed numbers. Its FP32 throughput is 6.2x higher, its pixel rate is 3.6x higher, its texture rate is 3.1x higher, and its memory bandwidth is a fixed 432.0 GB/s versus a system dependent figure for the Intel part. The LX ULTRA also has 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, 6144 shading units, and a newer DirectX feature level. Any workload that scales with compute throughput, memory bandwidth, or VRAM capacity will favor the LX ULTRA.

The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is the only choice for integrated graphics in a Meteor Lake mobile platform. Its 65 W TDP, IGP slot width, and system shared memory make it appropriate for systems where a discrete card cannot physically or electrically exist. Its 300 MHz base clock and 2200 MHz boost clock are the only recorded clock speeds in the comparison, since the LX ULTRA lists no base or boost clock. That means the Intel part has a defined clock behavior while the LX ULTRA's operating frequencies are not recorded.

Neither product has recorded benchmark wins, average scores, or nearest rivals in the database. The verdict therefore rests on specification analysis. Users who need a discrete desktop card with large VRAM and high throughput should select the LX ULTRA. Users who need an integrated mobile GPU should select the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile. The two products do not compete in the same physical or thermal class, so the choice is dictated by platform requirements rather than performance parity.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA in FP32 compute than the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile?

A: The LX ULTRA records 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, while the Intel part records 3.942 TFLOPS. Dividing the two gives approximately 6.2x higher raw compute throughput for the LX ULTRA.

Q: What memory configuration does each product use?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Which product supports a higher DirectX feature level?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1).

Q: What are the power requirements for each product?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile has a 65 W TDP. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has a 225 W TDP, uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, and lists a 550 W suggested PSU.

Q: What process nodes are used by each product?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile uses a 10 nm Intel process. The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses a 6 nm TSMC process.

Q: Do either of these products have recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. Both the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA have an average benchmark score of zero, no benchmark entries, and no nearest rivals in the database.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile uses the Xe-LPG architecture on the Meteor Lake chip, built on a 10 nm process at Intel's foundry. It belongs to the Arc Graphics-M generation and lists HD Graphics-M as its predecessor. Its compute configuration includes 896 shading units, 56 texture mapping units, and 24 ROPs. The architecture supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The memory interface is system shared, and the bus interface is Ring Bus, which ties the iGPU into the Meteor Lake processor's internal fabric. The 300 MHz base clock and 2200 MHz boost clock define its operating range. The production status is active, and the release date is recorded as 2023-12-13.

The Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA uses the TrueGPU architecture on the 7G105 chip, built on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the 7G100 generation. Its compute configuration includes 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. The architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The memory subsystem is 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and a 2250 MHz memory clock at 18 Gbps effective. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16, and the display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The production status is active, and the release date is recorded as 2026-03-16.

The architectures differ in fundamental design goals. Xe-LPG is an integrated architecture with shading units in the hundreds and a shared memory model. TrueGPU is a discrete architecture with shading units in the thousands and dedicated GDDR6 memory. The Intel part has no recorded RT cores or tensor cores, and the LX ULTRA also has no recorded RT cores or tensor cores, so neither product lists dedicated ray tracing or AI acceleration hardware in the database.

Specification Differences

The two products differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is manufactured by Intel with a 10 nm process, while the Lisuan Tech LX ULTRA has an unknown manufacturer, a 6 nm TSMC process, and unknown transistor and die size figures. The Intel part records a 300 MHz base clock and 2200 MHz boost clock; the LX ULTRA lists no base or boost clock. The Intel part uses system shared memory; the LX ULTRA uses 24 GB GDDR6 with a 192-bit bus and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

The shading unit count is 896 for Intel versus 6144 for Lisuan Tech. TMU count is 56 versus 192. ROP count is 24 versus 96. Pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 123.2 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 3.942 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 throughput is 7.885 TFLOPS versus 49.15 TFLOPS, both at a 2:1 ratio. TDP is 65 W versus 225 W. Slot width is IGP versus dual-slot. The LX ULTRA lists a 1x 16-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested PSU; the Intel part lists neither. Bus interface is Ring Bus versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are portable device dependent versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. DirectX support is 12 (12_1) versus 12 Ultimate (12_2). Vulkan support is 1.4 versus 1.3. OpenGL support is 4.6 for both.

Physical dimensions are recorded only for the LX ULTRA: 268 mm length, 112 mm height, and 40 mm width. The Intel part has no recorded dimensions due to its integrated nature. The LX ULTRA has no predecessor listed, while the Intel part lists HD Graphics-M as its predecessor. Neither product has a successor, launch MSRP, or transistor density recorded in the database.