Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile vs Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark matches for the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile and the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100. The head-to-head array is empty, and neither product has any individual benchmark scores entered in the database. The average benchmark score for both entries is zero, and neither item lists any nearest rivals with scores or delta percentages. Consequently, a direct numerical comparison of application performance cannot be derived from the captured data.

What the database does provide is a set of theoretical peak throughput figures derived from each design's clock rates, shader counts, and texture or pixel processing units. These figures allow a partial comparison of raw compute ceilings, even though no measured application scores exist.

In FP32 compute, the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS, which is roughly 6.2 times the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile's 3.942 TFLOPS. The difference is substantial, and it reflects the Lisuan part's much larger shader array. The Intel part uses 896 shading units, while the Lisuan part uses 6144 shading units. That is a 6.86 times difference in shader count, which tracks closely with the FP32 ratio.

In FP16 compute, the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 reaches 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, against the Intel part's 7.885 TFLOPS at the same 2:1 ratio. Again, the Lisuan part holds a strong lead, approximately 6.2 times higher. Both implementations use the same 2:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio, so the performance gap remains proportional across both precisions.

Pixel throughput shows a similar pattern. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 achieves 192.0 GPixel/s, while the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile achieves 52.80 GPixel/s. The Lisuan part is 3.64 times faster in pixel rate. Texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s for the Lisuan part versus 123.2 GTexel/s for the Intel part, a 3.12 times advantage. These ratios are smaller than the compute ratios, which suggests that the Intel architecture is less shader-heavy relative to its texture and pixel units.

Memory bandwidth is the most extreme gap in the dataset. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile uses system shared memory, and its bandwidth is listed as system dependent. No fixed number exists for the Intel part's memory bandwidth, so the comparison is qualitative: the Lisuan part has a dedicated, fixed memory subsystem with a high bandwidth figure, while the Intel part's bandwidth is not fixed and depends on the host system.

Clock behavior also differs sharply. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no base clock or boost clock listed in the database. Its memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective data rate. The Intel part's boost clock is 2200 MHz, but without the Lisuan core clock data, a direct clock-to-clock comparison is not possible.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile wins in the area of system integration and power envelope. Its TDP is 65 W, and it is an integrated graphics processor with an IGP slot width. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W and is a dual-slot add-in card with a 1x 8-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The Intel part's 65 W TDP is 160 W lower than the Lisuan part's 225 W TDP. For systems where power draw and physical footprint are constrained, the Intel part is the only viable option from this data.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 wins in every raw throughput category that has a fixed number: FP32, FP16, pixel rate, texture rate, and memory bandwidth. It also leads in memory capacity at 12 GB versus system shared memory, and in bus width at 192-bit versus system shared. Its DirectX support is 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1). For applications that require DirectX 12 Ultimate features, the Lisuan part has the API-level advantage.

The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. This gives the Intel part a newer Vulkan API version. Both parts support OpenGL 4.6, so there is no difference there.

The Lisuan part has a fixed set of display outputs: 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The Intel part's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, meaning its output configuration is tied to the host device. For a standalone desktop card, the Lisuan part's fixed four DisplayPort outputs are a clear advantage.

The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile uses a ring bus interface, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides a standard, high-bandwidth connection for a discrete card, while the ring bus is typical of an integrated part.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is built on the Xe-LPG architecture, part of the Meteor Lake chip, and belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Meteor Lake) generation. Its process node is 10 nm, and the foundry is Intel. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses the TrueGPU architecture, is based on the 7G106 chip, and belongs to the 7G100 generation. Its process node is 6 nm, and the foundry is TSMC.

The process node difference is notable: 10 nm for Intel versus 6 nm for TSMC. The smaller node gives the Lisuan part a manufacturing density advantage, though the database does not list transistor counts or die sizes for either part. The Intel part's transistor count is null, and the Lisuan part's transistor count is listed as unknown. Die size is also null for Intel and unknown for Lisuan. Transistor density is null for both.

Shader organization differs significantly. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile has 896 shading units, 56 texture mapping units, and 24 ROPs. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. The Lisuan part has 6.86 times the shading units, 3.43 times the TMUs, and 4 times the ROPs. Neither part lists ray tracing cores or tensor cores; both fields are null or absent.

The Intel part's generation is Arc Graphics-M (Meteor Lake), and its predecessor is HD Graphics-M. The Lisuan part's generation is 7G100, and it has no predecessor listed. The Intel part was released on 2023-12-13, while the Lisuan part has a release date of 2026-06-17. Both are marked as active production parts.

The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The Intel part's memory clock is listed as system shared, meaning it has no dedicated memory clock of its own. The Lisuan part uses GDDR6, while the Intel part uses system shared memory. The bus width is 192-bit for the Lisuan part versus system shared for the Intel part.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ on nearly every recorded specification. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has no base clock and no boost clock listed. The Lisuan part has a memory clock of 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective, while the Intel part's memory clock is system shared.

Memory size is 12 GB for the Lisuan part versus system shared for the Intel part. Memory type is GDDR6 for the Lisuan part versus system shared for Intel. Bus width is 192-bit versus system shared. Bandwidth is 432.0 GB/s versus system dependent.

Shading units are 896 for Intel and 6144 for Lisuan. Texture mapping units are 56 versus 192. ROPs are 24 versus 96. Pixel rate is 52.80 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 123.2 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 is 3.942 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 is 7.885 TFLOPS versus 49.15 TFLOPS, both at 2:1 ratio.

TDP is 65 W for Intel versus 225 W for Lisuan. Slot width is IGP for Intel versus dual-slot for Lisuan. The Lisuan part has a 1x 8-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The Intel part has no power connector listed and no suggested PSU. Bus interface is ring bus for Intel versus PCIe 4.0 x16 for Lisuan.

Display outputs are portable device dependent for Intel versus 4x DisplayPort 1.4a for Lisuan. DirectX support is 12 (12_1) for Intel versus 12 Ultimate (12_2) for Lisuan. OpenGL is 4.6 for both. Vulkan is 1.4 for Intel versus 1.3 for Lisuan.

Dimensions are only listed for the Lisuan part: length 294 mm (11.6 inches), height 120 mm (4.7 inches), width 49 mm (1.9 inches). The Intel part has no dimensions listed. The Lisuan part also has a fixed 12 GB memory capacity, while the Intel part relies entirely on the host system's shared memory.

The process node differs: 10 nm for Intel versus 6 nm for Lisuan. The foundry differs: Intel versus TSMC. The chip differs: Meteor Lake versus 7G106. The architecture differs: Xe-LPG versus TrueGPU. The generation differs: Arc Graphics-M (Meteor Lake) versus 7G100. The release dates differ: 2023-12-13 versus 2026-06-17.

Neither part has a launch MSRP in the database, so no pricing information is available. Both parts have a percentile versus all GPUs of 50, and both have an average benchmark score of zero.

FAQ

Q: Which part has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 delivers 24.58 TFLOPS in FP32, while the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile delivers 3.942 TFLOPS. The Lisuan part is approximately 6.2 times higher.

Q: How do the memory subsystems compare?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, so no fixed memory bandwidth figure exists for it.

Q: What are the power requirements for each part?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile has a TDP of 65 W and is an IGP with no power connector listed. The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 has a TDP of 225 W, uses a 1x 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Which part supports a newer DirectX version?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1). The Lisuan part supports the higher DirectX feature level.

Q: Which part supports a newer Vulkan version?

A: The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile supports Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 supports Vulkan 1.3. The Intel part has the newer Vulkan API version.

Q: Do both parts have the same process node?

A: No. The Intel Arc Graphics 112EU Mobile is built on a 10 nm process at Intel, while the Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC.