Intel Arc B570 vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Intel Arc B570 and Lisuan Tech LX MAX occupy different positions in the recorded database, with the former carrying a full set of benchmark results and the latter listed without any submitted scores. The LX MAX has an average benchmark score of zero, a percentile of 50 against all GPUs, and no nearest rivals. The Arc B570, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 20556, sits at the 65th percentile of all GPUs, and its closest measured competitors include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, Intel Arc A750, NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, and AMD Radeon R9 M390X. Because the head-to-head benchmark table is empty and neither card records a win in direct comparison, the analysis below draws on the individual specification fields and the Arc B570’s own benchmark suite to infer where each product would likely lead.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc B570 wins in any scenario where actual measured performance is required. Its database entries include ten benchmark results spanning DirectX 9, DirectX 10, DirectX 11, DirectX 12, OpenCL, and Vulkan workloads. The highest recorded score is 96844 in Geekbench Vulkan, followed by 83514 in Geekbench OpenCL. The Passmark G3D result is 14195, while Passmark GPU Compute reaches 7281. These are the only concrete performance numbers available for either product, so the Arc B570 is the only one of the two that can be positioned against other GPUs with confidence. Its nearest rival in average score is the Intel Arc A750 at 20582, a delta of minus 0.1 percent, meaning the B570 trails that card by a razor-thin margin. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, which is 0.1 percent behind the B570. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M sits 0.4 percent behind, and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X is 0.5 percent ahead.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX wins in raw specification counts. It carries 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units, compared to 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs on the Arc B570. Its FP32 throughput is listed at 24.58 TFLOPS, more than double the Arc B570’s 11.52 TFLOPS. FP16 is similarly larger at 49.15 TFLOPS versus 23.04 TFLOPS. Memory capacity is 12 GB against 10 GB, and memory bandwidth is 432.0 GB/s against 380.0 GB/s. The LX MAX also uses a wider 192-bit memory bus versus 160 bits. In any workload that scales with shading units, texture rate, or memory bandwidth, the LX MAX has the specification advantage. The texture rate is 384.0 GTexel/s versus 360.0 GTexel/s, a modest but real gap. The pixel rate is the one exception, with the Arc B570 at 200.0 GPixel/s and the LX MAX at 192.0 GPixel/s.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The Arc B570 uses Intel’s Xe2-HPG architecture, built on TSMC’s 5 nm process, with a chip designated BMG-G21. It belongs to the Battlemage generation within the Arc 5 series. The LX MAX uses an architecture labeled TrueGPU, with a chip designation of 7G106, and is built on TSMC’s 6 nm process. It belongs to a generation called 7G100. The process node difference is one nanometer in the database’s recorded values, with the Arc B570 on the smaller process.

Transistor counts and die size are only recorded for the Intel part. The Arc B570 has 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 72.1 million transistors per square millimeter. The LX MAX lists transistor count, die size, and density as unknown. Shading unit counts differ sharply, with the LX MAX using 6144 versus 2304 for the Arc B570. Ray tracing cores are present on the Arc B570 at 18 units, while the LX MAX lists no ray tracing core count. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate at feature level 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan, but the Vulkan version differs: the Arc B570 supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

Memory architecture differs in capacity, bus width, and bandwidth. The Arc B570 uses 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth and memory clocked at 2375 MHz, or 19 Gbps effective. The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and memory clocked at 2250 MHz, or 18 Gbps effective. The LX MAX has a larger memory pool and higher total bandwidth, but its memory clock is lower. The PCIe interface also differs: the Arc B570 is PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX MAX is PCIe 4.0 x16.

Power and cooling configurations are distinct as well. The Arc B570 has a TDP of 150 W and uses a single 8-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W and uses a single 16-pin power connector, with a suggested PSU of 550 W. Both are dual-slot cards. Display outputs differ: the Arc B570 provides one HDMI 2.1a port and three DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, while the LX MAX provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. Physical dimensions also differ. The Arc B570 is 272 mm long and 115 mm high. The LX MAX is 248 mm long, 118 mm high, and 48 mm wide. The width of the Arc B570 is not recorded.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark table in the database is empty, so there are no direct score comparisons between the Arc B570 and the LX MAX. The only way to frame the comparison is through the Arc B570’s individual benchmark results and the LX MAX’s complete lack of recorded scores. The Arc B570’s strongest result is in Geekbench Vulkan at 96844, which indicates strong asynchronous compute and low-level graphics performance in that API. Its OpenCL score of 83514 suggests solid general-purpose compute throughput. The Passmark DirectX 11 score of 118 is the highest among its DirectX entries, while DirectX 12 scores 72, DirectX 10 scores 65, and DirectX 9 scores 164. The Passmark G2D score is 661, and the Passmark G3D score is 14195.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the Arc B570 is tightly clustered. The Intel Arc A750, at 20582 average, is only 0.1 percent ahead. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, at 20534, is 0.1 percent behind. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, at 20480, is 0.4 percent behind. The AMD Radeon R9 M390X, at 20662, is 0.5 percent ahead. These deltas are small enough that the Arc B570 sits in a performance band where individual workload characteristics, driver state, and API selection would determine the winner against any single rival. The recorded percentile of 65 against all GPUs places it above the median but not near the top of the database.

For the LX MAX, the absence of benchmarks means the database cannot confirm any performance claim. Its specification sheet suggests high throughput in FP32 and FP16, and its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s exceeds the Arc B570’s 360.0 GTexel/s. Its pixel rate is lower at 192.0 GPixel/s versus 200.0 GPixel/s. If the LX MAX’s shading units scale as the architecture implies, it would likely lead in compute-heavy workloads, but the database records no data to verify that outcome.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 throughput?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX MAX is listed at 24.58 TFLOPS, while the Intel Arc B570 is listed at 11.52 TFLOPS.

Q: How much memory does each card have, and what is the bandwidth?

A: The Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does either card support ray tracing?

A: The Arc B570 lists 18 ray tracing cores. The LX MAX does not list a ray tracing core count.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The Arc B570 has a TDP of 150 W and a suggested PSU of 450 W, using one 8-pin connector. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W, using one 16-pin connector.

Q: Which GPU has recorded benchmark scores?

A: Only the Intel Arc B570 has recorded scores in the database, including a Geekbench Vulkan score of 96844 and a Passmark G3D score of 14195. The LX MAX has no benchmark entries.

Q: What is the process node for each GPU?

A: The Arc B570 is built on TSMC’s 5 nm process. The LX MAX is built on TSMC’s 6 nm process.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two products. The Arc B570 uses the BMG-G21 chip, Xe2-HPG architecture, and belongs to the Battlemage (Arc 5) generation. The LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip, TrueGPU architecture, and belongs to the 7G100 generation. The process node is 5 nm for the Arc B570 and 6 nm for the LX MAX. Transistor count is 19,600 million for the Arc B570, unknown for the LX MAX. Die size is 272 mm² for the Arc B570, unknown for the LX MAX.

The Arc B570 has base and boost clocks of 2500 MHz, while the LX MAX does not list base or boost clocks. Memory clock is 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) for the Arc B570 and 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the LX MAX. Memory size is 10 GB versus 12 GB. Bus width is 160 bit versus 192 bit. Bandwidth is 380.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s. Shading units are 2304 versus 6144. TMUs are 144 versus 192. ROPs are 80 versus 96. Ray tracing cores are 18 for the Arc B570, none listed for the LX MAX. Pixel rate is 200.0 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 360.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s. FP32 is 11.52 TFLOPS versus 24.58 TFLOPS. FP16 is 23.04 TFLOPS versus 49.15 TFLOPS.

TDP is 150 W versus 225 W. Power connector is one 8-pin versus one 16-pin. Suggested PSU is 450 W versus 550 W. Bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are one HDMI 2.1a and three DisplayPort 2.1 versus four DisplayPort 1.4a. Vulkan support is 1.4 versus 1.3. Dimensions are 272 mm by 115 mm for the Arc B570, with width not recorded, versus 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm for the LX MAX. The Arc B570 has a launch MSRP of 219 USD, while the LX MAX has no recorded launch price. The Arc B570 lists a predecessor named Alchemist; the LX MAX lists no predecessor.

The Verdict

The data supports two separate purchase directions. For anyone who requires verified performance, the Intel Arc B570 is the only option with recorded measurements. Its average benchmark score of 20556 places it in a tight group with the Intel Arc A750, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, and AMD Radeon R9 M390X, all within 0.5 percent of each other. The Arc B570’s 65th percentile against all GPUs indicates it outperforms a majority of the database’s entries, and its Vulkan and OpenCL scores show strong compute capability. Its 18 ray tracing cores provide a feature that the LX MAX does not list.

For anyone who prioritizes raw specification counts, the Lisuan Tech LX MAX presents a more aggressive configuration. It doubles the shading units, nearly doubles the FP32 throughput, adds 2 GB of memory, and delivers higher bandwidth and texture rate. Its wider 192-bit bus and 12 GB capacity make it better suited for large data sets. The LX MAX also carries no benchmark scores, so its real-world behavior remains unverified in this database. The Arc B570 has a lower TDP at 150 W versus 225 W, a smaller suggested PSU at 450 W versus 550 W, and uses a standard 8-pin connector rather than a 16-pin connector. The LX MAX has a higher pixel rate from the Arc B570 at 200.0 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, despite the LX MAX’s other specification advantages. The choice comes down to whether the buyer trusts the LX MAX’s theoretical specifications or the Arc B570’s recorded results.