Intel Arc B370 vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains a single benchmark entry for the Intel Arc B370, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no benchmark entries in the database, so direct head-to-head comparisons rely on the available scores and architectural throughput figures rather than side-by-side test results.

The Intel Arc B370 scores 1184 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. This places it at the 5th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in the recorded data are all older discrete mobile and desktop parts. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 averages 1186 points, which is 0.2% ahead of the Arc B370. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 averages 1190 points, 0.5% ahead. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M averages 1192 points, 0.7% ahead. The AMD FirePro M2000 averages 1168 points, which is 1.4% behind the Arc B370. The Arc B370 sits almost exactly at parity with these legacy parts, with deltas under 1.5% in either direction.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, meaning no completed benchmark result is recorded. Its percentile ranking is listed at 50, which reflects the absence of measured data rather than a performance level. Because there is no score for the 24EU Mobile, the Arc B370 effectively holds the only measurable performance data in this comparison.

Theoretical throughput figures provide a separate basis for comparison. The Arc B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the 24EU Mobile delivers 384.0 GFLOPS. The Arc B370 is 16 times higher in FP32 throughput. Pixel fill rate for the Arc B370 is 48.00 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s for the 24EU Mobile, a 12 times difference. Texture rate for the Arc B370 is 96.00 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s, an 8 times difference. These ratios are derived entirely from the recorded specification values.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different Intel graphics generations and use different microarchitectures. The Intel Arc B370 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture on the Panther Lake chip, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Xe-LP architecture on the Twin Lake chip. The Arc B370 belongs to the Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) generation, and the 24EU Mobile belongs to the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation.

The process nodes differ substantially. The Arc B370 is built on a 3 nm process, while the 24EU Mobile uses a 10 nm process. Both are fabricated by Intel. Transistor counts and die sizes are not recorded for either part.

Execution resources differ by a wide margin. The Arc B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster operation units. The 24EU Mobile has 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 4 raster operation units. The Arc B370 therefore has 6.7 times the shading units, 3.3 times the TMUs, and 5 times the ROPs.

Ray tracing hardware is present only on the Arc B370, which has 10 dedicated RT cores. The 24EU Mobile lists no ray tracing cores. Neither GPU has recorded tensor cores.

Clock behavior also differs. The Arc B370 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The 24EU Mobile has the same 300 MHz base clock but a boost clock of only 1000 MHz. The boost clock advantage for the Arc B370 is 2.4 times.

API support is higher on the Arc B370. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Power targets are very different. The Arc B370 has a TDP of 25 W, and the 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W. Both are integrated graphics processors with no dedicated power connectors, and both rely on system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The bus interface for the Arc B370 is listed as IGP, while the 24EU Mobile uses Ring Bus. Display outputs for both are portable device dependent.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc B370 wins on every measurable performance dimension in the recorded data. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1184 points is the only completed benchmark result between the two parts. The 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark score, so it cannot claim a measured win in any test.

In compute throughput, the Arc B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The 24EU Mobile delivers 384.0 GFLOPS FP32 and 768.0 GFLOPS FP16 (2:1). For FP32 workloads, the Arc B370 has a 16 times advantage. For FP16 workloads, the same 16 times ratio applies.

In rasterization throughput, the Arc B370 produces 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s. The 24EU Mobile produces 4.000 GPixel/s and 12.00 GTexel/s. The Arc B370 leads by 12 times in pixel rate and 8 times in texture rate.

The Arc B370 also supports hardware ray tracing with 10 RT cores, a feature absent from the 24EU Mobile. The DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) feature level on the Arc B370 allows for features not available on the 24EU Mobile, which is limited to DirectX 12 (12_1). The higher boost clock of 2400 MHz versus 1000 MHz further favors the Arc B370 in workloads that scale with clock speed.

The 24EU Mobile wins only in power efficiency as a raw specification. Its TDP of 6 W is 19 W lower than the Arc B370's 25 W. For thermally constrained portable devices, the 24EU Mobile draws less power, but this comes with a corresponding reduction in every measured and theoretical performance metric.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 in the database?

A: The Arc B370 scores 1184 points in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 averages 1186 points, which is 0.2% higher. The two are effectively at parity in the recorded data.

Q: Does the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile have any benchmark results in the database?

A: No. The 24EU Mobile has an empty benchmark list and an average benchmark score of 0. Its percentile ranking of 50 reflects the absence of measured data, not a performance result.

Q: What is the FP32 compute difference between the two GPUs?

A: The Arc B370 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS FP32, while the 24EU Mobile delivers 384.0 GFLOPS FP32. The Arc B370 has 16 times the FP32 throughput.

Q: Does either GPU support ray tracing?

A: The Arc B370 includes 10 ray tracing cores. The 24EU Mobile has no ray tracing cores listed in its specifications.

Q: How do the boost clocks differ?

A: The Arc B370 has a boost clock of 2400 MHz, and the 24EU Mobile has a boost clock of 1000 MHz. Both have a 300 MHz base clock.

Q: What DirectX versions do the two GPUs support?

A: The Arc B370 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), and the 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Specification Differences

• Architecture: Xe3-LPG on the Arc B370, Xe-LP on the 24EU Mobile
• Chip: Panther Lake on the Arc B370, Twin Lake on the 24EU Mobile
• Generation: Arc Graphics-M (Panther Lake) on the Arc B370, HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) on the 24EU Mobile
• Process node: 3 nm on the Arc B370, 10 nm on the 24EU Mobile
• Shading units: 1280 on the Arc B370, 192 on the 24EU Mobile
• Texture mapping units: 40 on the Arc B370, 12 on the 24EU Mobile
• Raster operation units: 20 on the Arc B370, 4 on the 24EU Mobile
• Ray tracing cores: 10 on the Arc B370, none on the 24EU Mobile
• Boost clock: 2400 MHz on the Arc B370, 1000 MHz on the 24EU Mobile
• Pixel rate: 48.00 GPixel/s on the Arc B370, 4.000 GPixel/s on the 24EU Mobile
• Texture rate: 96.00 GTexel/s on the Arc B370, 12.00 GTexel/s on the 24EU Mobile
• FP32 throughput: 6.144 TFLOPS on the Arc B370, 384.0 GFLOPS on the 24EU Mobile
• FP16 throughput: 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) on the Arc B370, 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1) on the 24EU Mobile
• TDP: 25 W on the Arc B370, 6 W on the 24EU Mobile
• Bus interface: IGP on the Arc B370, Ring Bus on the 24EU Mobile
• DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) on the Arc B370, 12 (12_1) on the 24EU Mobile
• Release date: 2026-01-26 for the Arc B370, 2024-12-31 for the 24EU Mobile
• 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score: 1184 on the Arc B370, no score recorded on the 24EU Mobile
• Percentile vs all GPUs: 5th for the Arc B370, 50th (no data) for the 24EU Mobile