Intel Arc A570M vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

FAQ

Q: What is the performance difference between the Intel Arc A570M and the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has an average benchmark score of 58,239, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark score and an average benchmark score of 0, placing it in the 50th percentile. The Arc A570M is substantially ahead in raw compute performance.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has 2,048 shading units, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has only 192 shading units. That is a 10.7x difference in shading unit count.

Q: What are the clock speeds of each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz.

Q: Do both GPUs support DirectX 12?

A: Yes, but at different feature levels. The Intel Arc A570M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each GPU?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses System Shared memory with System Dependent bandwidth.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has a TDP of 75 W, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different Intel architectures. The Intel Arc A570M is built on the Xe-HPG architecture, specifically the DG2-256 chip, and belongs to the Alchemist generation under Arc 5 Mobile. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Xe-LP architecture with the Twin Lake chip, belonging to the HD Graphics-T generation. These are fundamentally different designs: Xe-HPG targets discrete-class mobile graphics, while Xe-LP serves integrated graphics roles.

The manufacturing processes differ significantly. The Arc A570M is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, containing 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, which yields a transistor density of 42.8M per mm². The Graphics 24EU Mobile is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown in the database. The smaller process node and larger transistor budget give the Arc A570M a considerable structural advantage.

Compute resources differ by an order of magnitude. The Arc A570M features 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 16 ray tracing cores. The Graphics 24EU Mobile has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores listed. The Arc A570M also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing and mesh shaders, whereas the Graphics 24EU Mobile tops out at DirectX 12 (12_1), a lower feature tier. Both GPUs support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Memory architecture could not be more different. The Arc A570M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 128-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Graphics 24EU Mobile depends entirely on System Shared memory, with bandwidth listed as System Dependent. That distinction matters for texture streaming, frame buffer capacity, and sustained throughput in memory-heavy workloads.

The bus interface also separates the two. The Arc A570M connects over PCIe 4.0 x8, a dedicated multi-lane interface. The Graphics 24EU Mobile uses a Ring Bus, typical of integrated parts that share system resources. The Arc A570M's pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s for the Graphics 24EU Mobile, and texture rates are 166.4 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s. Peak FP32 performance is 5.325 TFLOPS versus 384.0 GFLOPS, a 13.9x gap.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc A570M wins decisively in every measured compute category. Its dedicated GDDR6 memory, 8 GB capacity, and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth allow it to handle large frame buffers and high-resolution textures without relying on system RAM. The 16 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, a feature entirely absent from the Graphics 24EU Mobile. DirectX 12 Ultimate support further positions the Arc A570M for modern gaming workloads that use DXR and other advanced rendering features.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins in the efficiency and integration domain. Its 6 W TDP is dramatically lower than the Arc A570M's 75 W, making it suitable for ultra-low-power portable devices where battery life and thermal output take priority over performance. The Ring Bus interface and shared system memory reduce component count and cost at the system level, though the database does not include pricing information. Its 300 MHz base clock and 1000 MHz boost clock are modest, but they align with a power budget that the Arc A570M cannot approach.

For workloads that require sustained GPU throughput, such as gaming, 3D rendering, or compute acceleration, the Arc A570M is the clear choice. For basic display output, video playback, and light 2D tasks in a low-power mobile device, the Graphics 24EU Mobile is the only one of the two that fits that thermal envelope. The data shows no benchmark where the Graphics 24EU Mobile outperforms the Arc A570M; its advantage is strictly in power consumption and system integration simplicity.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc A570M | Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Xe-HPG | Xe-LP |

| Generation | Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile) | HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 11,500 million | Unknown |

| Die Size | 269 mm² | Unknown |

| Base Clock | 900 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | 1000 MHz |

| Memory Size | 8 GB | System Shared |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | System Shared |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | System Shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 224.0 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 192 |

| TMUs | 128 | 12 |

| ROPs | 64 | 4 |

| RT Cores | 16 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | 4.000 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 166.4 GTexel/s | 12.00 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 5.325 TFLOPS | 384.0 GFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1) | 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 75 W | 6 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | Ring Bus |

| DirectX Support | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| Release Date | 2023-07-31 | 2024-12-31 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between these two GPUs, and the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores at all. However, the single recorded benchmark for the Intel Arc A570M provides a reference point. In Geekbench OpenCL, the Arc A570M scores 58,239. That result places it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

The nearest rivals to the Arc A570M help contextualize that score. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT averages 58,392, which is 0.3% above the Arc A570M. The NVIDIA P102-100 averages 58,528, 0.5% above. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 averages 58,657, 0.7% above. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM averages 58,085, which is 0.3% below the Arc A570M. The Arc A570M sits within a narrow band of less than one percent of these four rivals, indicating that its compute performance is competitive with that cluster of discrete GPUs.

The Graphics 24EU Mobile has no benchmark entry and no nearest rivals recorded in the database. Its average benchmark score is 0. The FP32 gap between the two GPUs is 5.325 TFLOPS versus 384.0 GFLOPS, meaning the Arc A570M delivers roughly 13.9 times the single-precision compute throughput. Pixel throughput is 83.20 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s, a 20.8x difference. Texture throughput is 166.4 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s, a 13.9x difference. These ratios illustrate the scale of the performance divide more clearly than any single benchmark could.

The Verdict

The Intel Arc A570M is the appropriate choice for any workload that demands real GPU compute. Its 58,239 OpenCL score, 88th percentile ranking, 8 GB GDDR6 memory, and ray tracing support position it as a discrete-class mobile GPU. The data shows it performs within 0.7% of the AMD Radeon PRO V710 and within 0.3% of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, both of which are far larger discrete parts. The Arc A570M also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, so modern rendering features are available.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is the appropriate choice only for systems where power consumption is the dominant constraint. Its 6 W TDP is one-twelfth that of the Arc A570M, and its Ring Bus interface plus shared system memory simplify system design. But its compute resources are minimal: 192 shading units, 4 ROPs, no ray tracing cores, and 384.0 GFLOPS of FP32 throughput. No benchmark score exists for this part, and its 50th percentile ranking reflects the absence of recorded performance data rather than a measured result.

The release dates also matter. The Arc A570M launched on 2023-07-31, while the Graphics 24EU Mobile launched on 2024-12-31. The newer integrated part does not close the performance gap. The recorded data indicates that these two GPUs serve completely different segments, and no benchmark result suggests any overlap in capability. Buyers should select based on the workload: compute-heavy tasks require the Arc A570M, while minimal-power display duties belong to the Graphics 24EU Mobile.