Intel Arc 140V Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

The Intel Arc 140V Mobile and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER represent two entirely different corners of the GPU market. The Arc 140V is an integrated graphics processor embedded in Intel's Lunar Lake mobile chips, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a massive, discrete add-in board designed for high-end desktop workloads. The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark runs for these two products, so the comparison relies on the recorded specifications, the single available benchmark score for the NVIDIA part, and the relative performance data captured for it.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data includes no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the Intel Arc 140V Mobile and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The only benchmark score available in the database is for the NVIDIA card. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER recorded a score of 6269.5 points. Its average benchmark score across all recorded runs is 6270 points.

The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has no benchmark entries in the database, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0. Its percentile ranking against all GPUs sits at 50, which places it in the middle of the database's overall distribution. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER holds a percentile ranking of 36 against all GPUs, which is a lower percentile despite carrying a far higher raw performance score. This is a direct consequence of how the percentile is calculated: the database compares the NVIDIA part against a very different set of peer products. The nearest rivals for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 with an average score of 6270 and a delta of 0%, meaning the two are statistically identical in the recorded data. The AMD FirePro W600 scores 6223, which is 0.8% behind the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The NVIDIA Quadro K620 scores 6282, which is 0.2% ahead. The AMD Radeon R7 M350 scores 6327, which is 0.9% ahead of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, so the database shows the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER performing effectively at parity with a small cluster of older and lower-tier cards in this particular test metric. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile, with no recorded scores, cannot be placed in the same comparison. The data confirms that the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a measured, benchmarked product with a specific score, while the Arc 140V has no measured performance entries to analyze.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Arc 140V Mobile have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the Intel Arc 140V Mobile, and its average benchmark score is 0. Its percentile ranking against all GPUs is 50, but this is not tied to any measured test result in the recorded data.

Q: What is the recorded benchmark score for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scored 6269.5 points in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, with an average benchmark score of 6270 points across recorded runs.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is effectively at parity with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, which has an identical average score of 6270 and a 0% delta. The AMD FirePro W600 trails by 0.8%, while the NVIDIA Quadro K620 and AMD Radeon R7 M350 lead by 0.2% and 0.9% respectively.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference between the two GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc 140V Mobile uses system shared memory, with its size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as system dependent. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of dedicated GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two chips?

A: The Intel Arc 140V Mobile uses a 3 nm process from TSMC, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses a 5 nm process from the same foundry. Both chips are manufactured by TSMC.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has a TDP of 37 W. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W, which is significantly higher and reflects a discrete card design.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on fundamentally different architectures. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile uses the Xe2-LPG architecture on the Lunar Lake chip, which is part of the Arc Graphics-M generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture on the GB203 chip, part of the GeForce 50-series. The Intel part is a 3 nm design from TSMC with a die size of 172 mm² and an unknown transistor count. The NVIDIA part is a 5 nm design from TSMC with a die size of 378 mm² and 45,600 million transistors, giving it a transistor density of 120.6 million transistors per square millimeter. The Intel chip is smaller in physical area and uses a denser process node, while the NVIDIA chip is more than twice the die size and packs a far larger transistor budget.

The shading resources differ dramatically. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units. It includes 8 ray tracing cores but no dedicated tensor cores listed in the database. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. It includes 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores. The NVIDIA part has roughly 8.75 times the shading units, 4.375 times the TMUs, and 3 times the ROPs of the Intel integrated part. Its ray tracing core count is 70 versus 8, and it has 280 tensor cores where the Intel part has none recorded.

Compute throughput follows the same pattern. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile delivers 3.994 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 7.987 TFLOPS of FP16 performance with a 2:1 ratio. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 and 43.94 TFLOPS of FP16 with a 1:1 ratio. The NVIDIA card is roughly 11 times faster in FP32 and 5.5 times faster in FP16. Pixel and texture rates follow the same trend: the Intel part has a pixel rate of 62.40 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 124.8 GTexel/s, while the NVIDIA part has a pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA card is 3.77 times faster in pixel fill and 5.5 times faster in texture fill.

Both GPUs support the same API feature set. Each lists DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The API compatibility is identical, so software feature support at the API level does not differentiate the two. The underlying hardware capabilities, however, are separated by a wide margin in raw compute and rendering resources.

Specification Differences

The clock behavior of the two cards is one of the most direct specification contrasts. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1950 MHz. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2452 MHz. The NVIDIA card's base clock is nearly 8 times higher than the Intel part's base clock, and its boost clock is about 26% higher than the Intel boost clock. The memory clocks also differ: the Intel part uses system shared memory with no fixed clock, while the NVIDIA card runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed.

The memory subsystem is a major differentiator. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has no dedicated VRAM; its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as system shared or system dependent. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a dedicated, high-bandwidth memory pool that the integrated Intel part cannot match. The Intel part's bandwidth is entirely dependent on the host system's memory configuration, which is not a fixed specification.

Power and physical design also diverge sharply. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has a TDP of 37 W and is an integrated graphics processor with an IGP slot width and IGP bus interface. It has no power connectors and no suggested PSU. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W, is a dual-slot card, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and connects via PCIe 5.0 x16. Its physical dimensions are 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The display outputs also differ: the Intel part is portable device dependent, while the NVIDIA card provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

The release dates place the two products in different timeframes. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile was released on September 23, 2024. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a release date of December 31, 2025. The NVIDIA card has a launch MSRP of 749 USD, which is recorded once here. The Intel part has no launch MSRP recorded. The Intel part's predecessor is HD Graphics-M, while the NVIDIA card has no predecessor listed in the database. Both are marked as active production status.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc 140V Mobile wins in power efficiency and physical integration. Its 37 W TDP is a fraction of the NVIDIA card's 350 W, and its IGP form factor means it requires no separate power connector, no expansion slot, and no dedicated PSU capacity. It is a 3 nm part with a 172 mm² die, which is smaller than the NVIDIA chip's 378 mm². For a mobile or compact system where power draw and space are constrained, the Arc 140V is the only realistic option between the two. Its system shared memory approach also removes the need for dedicated VRAM allocation, though it trades away the performance benefits of dedicated memory.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in every raw performance category recorded. It has more shading units, TMUs, ROPs, ray tracing cores, and tensor cores. It delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 performance versus 3.994 TFLOPS for the Intel part. Its memory bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s is a fixed, dedicated resource, whereas the Intel part's bandwidth is system dependent. Its pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s far exceed the Intel part's 62.40 GPixel/s and 124.8 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA card also has a higher base clock and boost clock. The NVIDIA card is the clear choice for any workload that demands high sustained throughput, such as rendering, compute, or high-resolution gaming, based strictly on the recorded specifications.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also has a measured benchmark presence. Its 6269.5 score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and its average score of 6270 give it a concrete performance data point. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has no such data. In terms of recorded evidence, the NVIDIA card is the only one of the two with verified benchmark output.

The Verdict

The data separates these two products into distinct roles. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile is an integrated GPU for the Lunar Lake mobile platform. It consumes 37 W, uses no dedicated memory, and occupies no expansion slot. It is a 3 nm part with a compact 172 mm² die and 1024 shading units. It is suitable for systems where low power draw and integration are priorities. Its performance ceiling is defined by its 3.994 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and system dependent memory, which places it in a completely different performance class from the dedicated NVIDIA card.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a high-end discrete graphics card. It uses 350 W, requires a 16-pin power connector, occupies a dual-slot form factor, and connects via PCIe 5.0 x16. It has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory, 8960 shading units, 70 ray tracing cores, and 280 tensor cores. Its 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance is more than an order of magnitude above the Intel part. Its measured 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5 confirms it as a benchmarked product, and its nearest rivals in the database, including the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, are all within a single percentage point of its average score.

For a builder choosing between these two, the decision is not about performance trade-offs. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER dominates the Arc 140V Mobile in every recorded computational metric. The Arc 140V Mobile only wins in power consumption, physical size, and integration simplicity. The database records no scenario where the Intel part outperforms the NVIDIA card in raw speed. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the only one of the two with a measured benchmark score, and it is the only one with a multi-thousand-point performance result. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile serves a different market segment entirely, one where the GPU is a secondary feature of a mobile processor rather than a dedicated component. The recorded data supports the conclusion that the NVIDIA card is the high-performance option, while the Intel part is the low-power integrated alternative.