AMD Radeon RX 7400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 7400 compare to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark?

A: The NVIDIA card scores 6269.5 points, while the AMD card scores 1103 points. The delta is -82.4%, meaning the NVIDIA card delivers a substantially higher performance level in this test.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 has an average benchmark score of 2467, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has an average benchmark score of 6270.

Q: Which GPU has more VRAM and what type of memory does each use?

A: The NVIDIA card has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory, while the AMD card has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The NVIDIA card also uses a 256-bit bus width versus the AMD card's 128-bit bus.

Q: What is the transistor count and die size difference between the two chips?

A: The NVIDIA GB203 chip contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, while the AMD Navi 33 chip contains 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die.

Q: What are the percentile rankings for each GPU in the database?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7400 sits in the 17th percentile of all GPUs, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits in the 36th percentile.

Q: What is the nearest rival to the NVIDIA card in the database?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 has an identical average score of 6270, showing a 0 percent delta. The AMD Radeon RX 7400's closest rival is the AMD Radeon 8040S with an average score of 2440, a delta of 1.1 percent.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different design families. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, from the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip on Blackwell 2.0 architecture from the GeForce 50 generation.

Manufacturing processes differ. Both use TSMC as the foundry, but the AMD chip is fabricated on a 6 nm process while the NVIDIA chip uses a 5 nm process. This process advantage contributes to the NVIDIA chip's higher transistor density of 120.6 million transistors per square millimeter, compared to 65.2 million per square millimeter for the AMD chip. The physical scale differs as well: the NVIDIA die measures 378 mm² versus 204 mm² for AMD.

Compute resources show a wide gap. The NVIDIA chip has 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores. The AMD chip has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 RT cores. Notably, the AMD chip has no tensor core field recorded, while the NVIDIA chip carries 280. The FP32 throughput is 43.94 TFLOPS for NVIDIA and 16.49 TFLOPS for AMD. FP16 performance is also split: NVIDIA delivers 43.94 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while AMD reaches 32.97 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, meaning AMD's FP16 rate is achieved through a paired execution scheme rather than native throughput.

Memory architecture diverges significantly. The NVIDIA card uses 16 GB of GDDR7 across a 256-bit bus, yielding 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD card uses 8 GB of GDDR6 across a 128-bit bus, yielding 288.0 GB/s. Clock behavior also differs: the NVIDIA card has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost of 2452 MHz, while the AMD card has a base of 1452 MHz, a game clock of 2200 MHz, and a boost of 2300 MHz. The memory clock for NVIDIA is listed as 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective, while AMD's memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Power delivery and interface specifications show contrast. The AMD card has a TDP of 43 W and uses a single 6-pin power connector with a suggested PSU of 200 W. The NVIDIA card has a TDP of 350 W and uses a single 16-pin connector. The bus interface differs: PCIe 4.0 x8 for AMD versus PCIe 5.0 x16 for NVIDIA. Display outputs are similar but not identical: AMD offers 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1, while NVIDIA offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The NVIDIA card has recorded physical dimensions of 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The AMD card has no dimension data recorded. Both are dual-slot designs.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains one direct head-to-head benchmark between these two cards: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5, and the AMD Radeon RX 7400 scores 1103. The delta percentage is -82.4 percent from the AMD card's perspective, confirming a decisive NVIDIA advantage in this workload.

This single result aligns with the average benchmark scores. The NVIDIA card averages 6270 across its recorded benchmarks, while the AMD card averages 2467. The gap is roughly 2.5 times in favor of NVIDIA. The AMD card's individual benchmark results range from 44 in Passmark DirectX 12 to 1209 in Passmark G2D. Its Passmark G3D score of 11897 and GPU compute score of 5152 sit well below the NVIDIA card's single recorded 3DMark result.

The NVIDIA card's nearest rival comparison places it nearly at parity with the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, which also scores 6270. The AMD card's nearest rivals cluster much lower: the Radeon 8040S at 2440 (1.1 percent delta), GeForce 710M at 2433 (1.4 percent), Intel HD Graphics 610 at 2425 (1.8 percent), and GeForce GT 710M at 2422 (1.9 percent). This indicates the RX 7400 competes in a much lower performance tier than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the two cards:

• Architecture: RDNA 3.0 versus Blackwell 2.0
• Process node: 6 nm versus 5 nm
• Transistors: 13,300 million versus 45,600 million
• Die size: 204 mm² versus 378 mm²
• Transistor density: 65.2M / mm² versus 120.6M / mm²
• Base clock: 1452 MHz versus 2295 MHz
• Boost clock: 2300 MHz versus 2452 MHz
• Memory clock: 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective)
• Memory size: 8 GB versus 16 GB
• Memory type: GDDR6 versus GDDR7
• Memory bus width: 128 bit versus 256 bit
• Memory bandwidth: 288.0 GB/s versus 896.0 GB/s
• Shading units: 1792 versus 8960
• TMUs: 112 versus 280
• ROPs: 64 versus 96
• RT cores: 28 versus 70
• Tensor cores: none recorded versus 280
• Pixel rate: 147.2 GPixel/s versus 235.4 GPixel/s
• Texture rate: 257.6 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s
• FP32: 16.49 TFLOPS versus 43.94 TFLOPS
• FP16: 32.97 TFLOPS (2:1) versus 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1)
• TDP: 43 W versus 350 W
• Power connector: 1x 6-pin versus 1x 16-pin
• Suggested PSU: 200 W versus none recorded
• Bus interface: PCIe 4.0 x8 versus PCIe 5.0 x16
• Display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 versus 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
• Dimensions: none recorded versus 304 mm x 137 mm x 48 mm
• Release date: 2025-08-07 versus 2025-12-31
• Launch MSRP: none recorded versus 749 USD

Fields that match include DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4, and dual-slot width.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins the only recorded head-to-head benchmark, and its wins extend across nearly every measured specification. It has double the memory capacity, a wider bus, higher bandwidth, more shading units, more RT cores, more texture units, and more ROPs. Its FP32 throughput is roughly 2.7 times that of the AMD card. The NVIDIA card also holds the advantage in transistor density, pixel rate, and texture rate. It occupies the 36th percentile of all GPUs, while the AMD card sits at the 17th percentile.

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 wins in a few specific areas. It consumes far less power at 43 W versus 350 W, making it a lower-power design. It also has a higher memory clock in raw MHz terms (2250 MHz versus 1750 MHz), although NVIDIA's effective data rate is higher at 28 Gbps versus 18 Gbps. The AMD card has a suggested PSU rating of 200 W, which reflects a lighter system power requirement. Its release date precedes the NVIDIA card by several months. The AMD card also has a game clock field recorded at 2200 MHz, while the NVIDIA card has no game clock entry.

The AMD card's nearest rivals include integrated and entry-level parts such as Intel HD Graphics 610 and GeForce 710M, which places its performance context firmly in the low end. The NVIDIA card's nearest rivals include the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, a high-end part with identical average score. This contrast underscores the positioning of both cards in the database.

The Verdict

The data points to a straightforward conclusion. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5, which is 82.4 percent higher than the AMD Radeon RX 7400's 1103. Its average benchmark score of 6270 versus 2467 confirms that the performance gap persists across the recorded data. The NVIDIA card is built on a larger die with more transistors, higher density, more compute units, faster memory, and a wider bus. It also carries tensor cores, which the AMD card lacks entirely.

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is the lower-power option at 43 W TDP, with a smaller die and a 6-pin connector. It targets a different performance segment, as shown by its nearest rivals being entry-level and integrated GPUs. The NVIDIA card's nearest rival is the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, which matches its average score exactly.

For workloads that demand high frame rates, large memory pools, or ray tracing performance, the recorded data favors the NVIDIA card. For systems with tight power limits, the AMD card's 43 W TDP and 200 W suggested PSU present a lighter requirement. The NVIDIA card's launch MSRP is 749 USD, and no pricing data exists for the AMD card. The choice comes down to the performance tier each card occupies, with NVIDIA dominating the measured benchmarks and AMD offering a much lower-power alternative.