AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile. The database contains separate benchmark suites for each product, and the results indicate they occupy very different performance tiers.

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB posts a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1995. This places it at the 13th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GRID K1 at 1976, a 1% deficit, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 at 1973, a 1.1% deficit. The data also shows the Intel UHD Graphics 770 scoring 2027, which is 1.6% ahead of the AMD card, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M at 2029, 1.7% ahead. These close margins place the RX 6750 GRE 10 GB squarely in the entry-level performance segment.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile presents a substantially different picture. Its average benchmark score across multiple tests reaches 29928, which places it at the 75th percentile among all GPUs. The nearest rivals confirm its position: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti scores 29945, a negligible 0.1% difference, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti scores 29783, putting the mobile card 0.5% ahead. The AMD Radeon RX 6800 scores 30095, 0.6% ahead of the RTX 5070 Mobile, and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 scores 30433, 1.7% ahead.

The RTX 5070 Mobile's individual benchmark results reveal its strengths. The Geekbench OpenCL score reaches 122238, and the Geekbench Vulkan score sits at 116960. Passmark results show a DirectX 11 score of 192, DirectX 12 at 93, DirectX 10 at 129, and DirectX 9 at 214. The Passmark G3D score of 20355 and GPU compute score of 8279 further characterize its performance profile.

Comparing the two directly using the available data, the RTX 5070 Mobile's average benchmark score of 29928 is roughly 15 times higher than the RX 6750 GRE 10 GB's single 1995 score. The percentile gap is equally stark: 75th versus 13th. The data indicates these products do not compete in the same performance class.

FAQ

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare between the two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB averages 1995 across its recorded benchmarks, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile averages 29928. The NVIDIA card holds a 75th percentile ranking versus 13th for the AMD card.

Q: What are the nearest performance rivals for each GPU?

A: The RX 6750 GRE 10 GB sits within 1.7% of the NVIDIA GRID K1, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470, Intel UHD Graphics 770, and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M. The RTX 5070 Mobile sits within 1.7% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, AMD Radeon RX 6800, and AMD Radeon RX 6700.

Q: Which GPU has a higher transistor count?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile contains 21,900 million transistors, compared to 17,200 million for the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The AMD card uses 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus with 320.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA card uses 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus with 384.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How do the power requirements differ?

A: The RX 6750 GRE 10 GB has a 170 W TDP and requires a 450 W suggested PSU with a single 8-pin connector. The RTX 5070 Mobile has a 50 W TDP, uses no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU listed.

Q: What are the release dates for these products?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB was released on October 16, 2023. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile was released on April 14, 2025.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and manufacturing processes. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB uses the Navi 22 chip built on RDNA 2.0 architecture, produced on a 7 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile uses the GB206 chip built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, produced on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The process node difference directly affects transistor density: the AMD chip packs 51.3 million transistors per square millimeter across a 335 mm² die, while the NVIDIA chip achieves 121.0 million transistors per square millimeter on a much smaller 181 mm² die. Despite the smaller die, the NVIDIA chip contains more total transistors at 21,900 million versus 17,200 million.

The compute configurations differ significantly. The RX 6750 GRE 10 GB contains 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The RTX 5070 Mobile contains 4608 shading units, double the AMD count, but fewer ROPs at 48. Both have 144 TMUs and 36 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA card adds 144 tensor cores, a feature the AMD card lacks entirely.

Clock speeds show an interesting inversion. The AMD card runs a base clock of 1941 MHz and a boost clock of 2450 MHz, with a game clock of 2189 MHz. The NVIDIA card runs much lower clocks: 907 MHz base and 1425 MHz boost. Memory clocks also differ: the AMD card uses 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed, while the NVIDIA card uses 1500 MHz with 24 Gbps effective speed.

The memory subsystems take different approaches. The AMD card uses 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, yielding 320.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA card uses 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, yielding higher bandwidth at 384.0 GB/s despite the narrower bus. The pixel rate favors AMD at 156.8 GPixel/s versus 68.40 GPixel/s for NVIDIA, while the texture rate also favors AMD at 352.8 GTexel/s versus 205.2 GTexel/s. However, FP32 throughput favors NVIDIA at 13.13 TFLOPS versus 11.29 TFLOPS for AMD. The FP16 numbers reveal architectural differences: AMD achieves 22.58 TFLOPS through a 2:1 ratio, while NVIDIA matches its FP32 rate at 13.13 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio.

The form factors could not be more different. The AMD card is a dual-slot desktop card measuring 267 mm in length, 110 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, requiring a 1x 8-pin power connector and a 450 W suggested PSU. The NVIDIA card is an integrated graphics package with no dimensions listed, no power connectors, and a 50 W TDP. The AMD card uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and provides 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The NVIDIA card uses PCIe 5.0 x16 and lists its display outputs as portable device dependent.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear separation between these two products. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile delivers an average benchmark score of 29928, placing it at the 75th percentile and within 1.7% of desktop-class GPUs like the RTX 3070 Ti, RTX 2080 Ti, RX 6800, and RX 6700. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB scores 1995, placing it at the 13th percentile and within 1.7% of integrated and legacy parts like the Intel UHD Graphics 770 and GTX 470.

The RTX 5070 Mobile offers more than double the shading units, higher FP32 throughput, 144 tensor cores, faster memory bandwidth, a smaller die, and dramatically lower power consumption at 50 W versus 170 W. The RX 6750 GRE 10 GB counters with more VRAM at 10 GB versus 8 GB, higher pixel and texture rates, a wider memory bus, and a faster boost clock.

The data indicates the NVIDIA card is the stronger performer for compute and modern workloads, while the AMD card retains advantages in raw rasterization rates and memory capacity. The RTX 5070 Mobile's release in April 2025 makes it a newer design than the October 2023 AMD card. For applications that scale with shading units, tensor cores, and memory bandwidth, the RTX 5070 Mobile is the clear choice based on benchmark results. For scenarios prioritizing pixel throughput and VRAM capacity, the RX 6750 GRE 10 GB holds specific advantages, though its overall benchmark standing is far below the NVIDIA part.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 17,200 million | 21,900 million |

| Die Size | 335 mm² | 181 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 51.3M / mm² | 121.0M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1941 MHz | 907 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2450 MHz | 1425 MHz |

| Game Clock | 2189 MHz | Not listed |

| Memory Size | 10 GB | 8 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus Width | 160 bit | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 320.0 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2304 | 4608 |

| TMUs | 144 | 144 |

| ROPs | 64 | 48 |

| RT Cores | 36 | 36 |

| Tensor Cores | Not listed | 144 |

| Pixel Rate | 156.8 GPixel/s | 68.40 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 352.8 GTexel/s | 205.2 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 11.29 TFLOPS | 13.13 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 22.58 TFLOPS (2:1) | 13.13 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 170 W | 50 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | Not listed |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable Device Dependent |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |

| Release Date | 2023-10-16 | 2025-04-14 |

| Launch MSRP | 309 USD | Not listed |

Both GPUs share the same DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 API support. The PCIe interface differs by one generation, with the NVIDIA card using PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16 for AMD. The production status for both is listed as active. The AMD card has a listed predecessor in Navi and successor in Navi III, while the NVIDIA card lists GeForce 40 Mobile as its predecessor and no successor.