AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU vs Intel Arc 140V Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU and the Intel Arc 140V Mobile contains no benchmark scores, no win counts, and no head-to-head benchmark entries. The database has both parts listed with an average benchmark score of 0, a percentile versus all GPUs of 50 for each, and no nearest rival entries. This means a direct numerical performance comparison cannot be made from the available measurements.

What the data does provide is a set of theoretical throughput figures derived from each GPU’s architecture. The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU delivers 8.294 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Arc 140V Mobile delivers 3.994 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The AMD part is therefore 2.077 times higher in raw single-precision floating-point throughput, or roughly 108% ahead of the Intel part on this specific metric. In FP16 compute, the AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU again posts 8.294 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, whereas the Intel Arc 140V Mobile reaches 7.987 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The gap in FP16 is far smaller, with the AMD part leading by 0.307 TFLOPS, approximately 3.8% ahead. This indicates that Intel’s architecture uses a 2:1 FP16 path, effectively doubling its rate relative to its FP32 throughput, while AMD maintains a 1:1 rate.

Texture fill rate is another measurable point of comparison. The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU achieves 129.6 GTexel/s, while the Intel Arc 140V Mobile achieves 124.8 GTexel/s. The AMD part leads by 4.8 GTexel/s, which is about 3.8% higher. Pixel fill rate, however, favors the AMD part more decisively. The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU posts 86.40 GPixel/s, while the Intel Arc 140V Mobile posts 62.40 GPixel/s. That is a 24.0 GPixel/s difference, meaning the AMD GPU is 38.5% faster in pixel throughput. These fill-rate figures are derived from clock speeds and unit counts, not from real-world game benchmarks, so they should be interpreted as theoretical maxima rather than observed performance.

The data shows no wins for either part because no benchmark entries exist. The headToHeadBenchmarks array is empty, winsA is 0, and winsB is 0. The database records both GPUs at the same percentile rank of 50, which places them at the median of all GPUs tracked, but this percentile is not accompanied by any score data or rival list. Therefore, the only defensible statements are those based on the specification-derived rates listed above. In summary, the AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU holds clear theoretical advantages in FP32 compute, FP16 compute, texture fill rate, and pixel fill rate. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has no recorded metric where it exceeds the AMD part in these measured categories.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers and use different architectures and process nodes. The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU is built on the Hawk Point chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile is built on the Lunar Lake chip with Xe2-LPG architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process, also at TSMC. The AMD part has a transistor count of 25,390 million and a die size of 178 mm², giving a transistor density of 142.6 million transistors per square millimeter. The Intel part has an unknown transistor count and a die size of 172 mm², with no density figure recorded.

Clock behavior differs substantially. The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2700 MHz. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1950 MHz. The AMD part boosts 750 MHz higher than the Intel part, which contributes to its higher fill rates and compute throughput. The AMD memory clock is listed as 937 MHz with 7.5 Gbps effective, while the Intel memory clock is listed as "System Shared," indicating that it does not have dedicated memory timing in the same fashion.

Memory configuration is a major architectural split. The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU has 16 GB of LPDDR5X memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 119.9 GB/s. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile uses system shared memory, with the memory type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent." This means the Intel GPU relies on the host system’s memory, and its bandwidth is not fixed in the database. The AMD part has a dedicated memory subsystem with a specific bandwidth figure, while the Intel part has no fixed memory specification.

Shader resources differ as well. The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has 1024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. Despite having more shading units and TMUs, the Intel part produces lower texture and pixel fill rates due to its lower boost clock. Ray tracing core counts also differ: the AMD part has 12 ray tracing cores, while the Intel part has 8 ray tracing cores. Neither part lists tensor cores.

Power consumption is recorded differently. The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU has a TDP of 28 W, while the Intel Arc 140V Mobile has a TDP of 37 W. The Intel part consumes more power according to the database, yet delivers lower FP32 throughput and lower fill rates. The AMD part has no power connectors listed, and the Intel part has no power connector data. The Intel part is classified as an IGP with a bus interface of IGP, while the AMD part has no bus interface listed. Display outputs also differ: the AMD part has 1x USB Type-C, while the Intel part has outputs that are "Portable Device Dependent."

Both GPUs support the same API feature set: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel part has a predecessor listed as HD Graphics-M, while the AMD part has no predecessor. The Intel part was released on 2024-09-23, and the AMD part on 2024-12-31. Both are marked as Active in production status.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU delivers 8.294 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel Arc 140V Mobile delivers 3.994 TFLOPS. The AMD part is roughly 108% higher in this metric.

Q: How do the memory systems compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU uses 16 GB of LPDDR5X on a 128-bit bus with 119.9 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile uses system shared memory, with bandwidth listed as system dependent.

Q: What are the clock speeds for each GPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2700 MHz. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1950 MHz.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Intel Arc 140V Mobile has 1024 shading units, while the AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU has 768 shading units. However, the AMD part has a higher boost clock and higher fill rates.

Q: What is the TDP of each GPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU has a TDP of 28 W, and the Intel Arc 140V Mobile has a TDP of 37 W.

Q: Which GPU has a higher pixel fill rate?

A: The AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU has a pixel rate of 86.40 GPixel/s, while the Intel Arc 140V Mobile has a pixel rate of 62.40 GPixel/s. The AMD part is 38.5% higher.

Specification Differences

The database records the following fields where the two GPUs differ:

• Process Node: AMD is 4 nm, Intel is 3 nm.
• Foundry: Both use TSMC, but node sizes differ.
• Transistors: AMD has 25,390 million, Intel is unknown.
• Die Size: AMD is 178 mm², Intel is 172 mm².
• Transistor Density: AMD is 142.6M / mm², Intel has none listed.
• Base Clock: AMD is 800 MHz, Intel is 300 MHz.
• Boost Clock: AMD is 2700 MHz, Intel is 1950 MHz.
• Memory Clock: AMD is 937 MHz (7.5 Gbps effective), Intel is system shared.
• Memory Size: AMD is 16 GB, Intel is system shared.
• Memory Type: AMD is LPDDR5X, Intel is system shared.
• Memory Bus Width: AMD is 128 bit, Intel is system shared.
• Memory Bandwidth: AMD is 119.9 GB/s, Intel is system dependent.
• Shading Units: AMD has 768, Intel has 1024.
• Texture Mapping Units: AMD has 48, Intel has 64.
• Raster Output Units: Both have 32.
• Ray Tracing Cores: AMD has 12, Intel has 8.
• Pixel Rate: AMD is 86.40 GPixel/s, Intel is 62.40 GPixel/s.
• Texture Rate: AMD is 129.6 GTexel/s, Intel is 124.8 GTexel/s.
• FP32 Compute: AMD is 8.294 TFLOPS, Intel is 3.994 TFLOPS.
• FP16 Compute: AMD is 8.294 TFLOPS (1:1), Intel is 7.987 TFLOPS (2:1).
• TDP: AMD is 28 W, Intel is 37 W.
• Slot Width: AMD has none listed, Intel is IGP.
• Power Connectors: AMD is none, Intel has none listed.
• Bus Interface: AMD has none listed, Intel is IGP.
• Display Outputs: AMD is 1x USB Type-C, Intel is portable device dependent.
• Release Date: AMD is 2024-12-31, Intel is 2024-09-23.
• Predecessor: AMD has none, Intel is HD Graphics-M.
• Chip: AMD is Hawk Point, Intel is Lunar Lake.
• Architecture: AMD is RDNA 3.0, Intel is Xe2-LPG.
• Generation: AMD is Console GPU (AMD), Intel is Arc Graphics-M (Lunar Lake).

The only fields where the two match are the foundry (TSMC), ROP count (32), API support (DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4), production status (Active), and the absence of tensor cores and launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU wins in several theoretical performance categories. It has higher FP32 compute at 8.294 TFLOPS versus 3.994 TFLOPS, higher FP16 compute at 8.294 TFLOPS versus 7.987 TFLOPS, higher texture rate at 129.6 GTexel/s versus 124.8 GTexel/s, and higher pixel rate at 86.40 GPixel/s versus 62.40 GPixel/s. It also has a higher boost clock at 2700 MHz versus 1950 MHz, a dedicated 16 GB memory subsystem with 119.9 GB/s bandwidth, more ray tracing cores at 12 versus 8, and a lower TDP at 28 W versus 37 W.

The Intel Arc 140V Mobile wins in a smaller set of specification categories. It has more shading units at 1024 versus 768, more texture mapping units at 64 versus 48, a smaller process node at 3 nm versus 4 nm, a slightly smaller die size at 172 mm² versus 178 mm², and an earlier release date. It also has a higher TDP, which is not a performance advantage but a power draw difference. The Intel part does not show a win in any compute or fill-rate metric.

In terms of use cases, the AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU appears better suited for workloads that rely on raw FP32 throughput, such as general-purpose compute or graphics rendering that uses single-precision shaders. Its higher pixel rate suggests an advantage in resolution-bound rasterization, where fill rate limits performance. The dedicated memory with a fixed bandwidth of 119.9 GB/s provides a consistent memory performance profile, which may be preferable for applications that require predictable bandwidth. The lower TDP of 28 W also indicates that the AMD part fits into a lower power envelope.

The Intel Arc 140V Mobile, with its system shared memory, is more dependent on the host platform’s memory configuration. Its higher shading unit count and TMU count do not translate into higher recorded fill rates, but they indicate a different architectural layout. The FP16 rate of 7.987 TFLOPS is close to the AMD part’s 8.294 TFLOPS, so applications that use FP16 math may see a smaller gap. The Intel part’s 3 nm process node suggests a denser manufacturing process, though the transistor count is unknown. Its earlier release date means it has been available for a longer period.

The data does not support a win for either GPU in actual benchmark scenarios, as no benchmark results are recorded. The use-case split must therefore be drawn from theoretical specifications.

The Verdict

The recorded data places the AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU ahead of the Intel Arc 140V Mobile in every measured compute and fill-rate category. The AMD part delivers more than double the FP32 throughput, a meaningful lead in FP16 throughput, a higher texture fill rate, and a substantially higher pixel fill rate. It also comes with a dedicated 16 GB memory pool and a lower TDP.

The Intel Arc 140V Mobile counters with a higher shading unit count, a higher TMU count, a smaller process node, and a smaller die size, but these do not result in higher recorded performance rates. Its FP16 output is close to the AMD part, but still lower. Its system shared memory model means its bandwidth is not fixed in the database and depends on the host system.

For users who prioritize raw compute throughput, fill rates, and a fixed memory bandwidth, the AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU is the stronger choice according to the data. For users who value a smaller process node or a higher shading unit count, the Intel Arc 140V Mobile has those specification advantages, but no performance metric in the database where it leads. The Intel part also has an earlier release date and a predecessor listed, while the AMD part has neither.

The database records both GPUs at the same percentile rank of 50 and the same average benchmark score of 0, which indicates that no performance data has been aggregated for either part. Therefore, the verdict here is based solely on the specification-derived figures, not on observed benchmark outcomes. Given those figures, the AMD Ryzen Z2 GPU is the better-positioned part in terms of theoretical performance, power efficiency, and memory configuration. The Intel Arc 140V Mobile offers architectural alternatives, but the recorded data does not show any category where it outperforms the AMD part in compute or fill rate.