AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT and Lisuan Tech LX MAX occupy different positions in the current GPU landscape. The RX 9070 XT is a fully specified product with a complete benchmark record, while the LX MAX lists no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The comparison therefore relies on architectural, memory, and interface specifications for the LX MAX, and on measured results for the RX 9070 XT.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no shared benchmark results between the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT and the Lisuan Tech LX MAX. The RX 9070 XT has ten recorded benchmark scores. The LX MAX has none. This means a direct numerical comparison of performance is not possible from the recorded data. What can be examined is how the RX 9070 XT performs against its nearest rivals, and how the LX MAX’s specifications position it relative to that measured performance.

The RX 9070 XT scores 7260 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 17428, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 65879. In Passmark tests, the RX 9070 XT records 154 in DirectX 10, 292 in DirectX 11, 78 in DirectX 12, and 353 in DirectX 9. The Passmark G2D score is 1328, the G3D score is 26795, and the GPU compute score is 15864. The average benchmark score across these results is 13543.

The RX 9070 XT’s average score of 13543 places it within 0.1% of the AMD Radeon HD 7770M, which averages 13536. It is 0.2% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570, which averages 13515. The RX 9070 XT is 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA P106-090, which averages 13470, and 1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 555, which averages 13407. These delta percentages are small, meaning the RX 9070 XT sits in a tightly packed cluster of comparable average scores.

The LX MAX has no benchmark entries, no average score, and no nearest rivals in the database. Its percentile rank against all GPUs is 50, while the RX 9070 XT sits at the 55th percentile. The absence of measured scores for the LX MAX means the head-to-head section can only report the RX 9070 XT’s results and note the lack of comparable data. The LX MAX’s theoretical peak performance, based on its listed FP32 figure of 24.58 TFLOPS, is roughly half the RX 9070 XT’s 48.66 TFLOPS. That is a specification-based estimate, not a benchmark result.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 9070 XT wins in every category where measured data exists. Its FP32 compute rate of 48.66 TFLOPS is double the LX MAX’s 24.58 TFLOPS. The RX 9070 XT’s texture rate is 760.3 GTexel/s against 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX MAX. Pixel rate favors the RX 9070 XT as well, at 380.2 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s. Memory bandwidth is 644.6 GB/s for the RX 9070 XT and 432.0 GB/s for the LX MAX.

The RX 9070 XT uses 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus. The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus. The RX 9070 XT’s memory clock is 2518 MHz with 20.1 Gbps effective transfer, while the LX MAX runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The larger memory capacity, wider bus, and higher clock all favor the RX 9070 XT.

The LX MAX does hold advantages in a few specification areas. It has 6144 shading units against 4096 for the RX 9070 XT. Its FP16 compute rate of 49.15 TFLOPS is slightly higher than its own FP32 rate, and it exceeds the RX 9070 XT’s FP16 figure of 48.66 TFLOPS. The LX MAX also has a higher DirectX feature level support record for 12 Ultimate (12_2), matching the RX 9070 XT. Vulkan support is 1.3 for the LX MAX and 1.4 for the RX 9070 XT. OpenGL support is 4.6 for both.

In terms of physical footprint, the LX MAX is a dual-slot card measuring 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The RX 9070 XT has no recorded dimensions. Power draw is lower for the LX MAX at 225 W versus 304 W for the RX 9070 XT, and the suggested power supply is 550 W for the LX MAX against 700 W for the RX 9070 XT.

FAQ

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the LX MAX. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals. The RX 9070 XT has ten recorded benchmark scores with an average of 13543.

Q: How does the FP32 compute performance compare between the two cards?

A: The RX 9070 XT delivers 48.66 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The LX MAX delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. The RX 9070 XT’s FP32 rate is exactly double that of the LX MAX.

Q: Which card has more memory and higher bandwidth?

A: The RX 9070 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 644.6 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The RX 9070 XT has a TDP of 304 W and requires a 700 W power supply. The LX MAX has a TDP of 225 W and requires a 550 W power supply. The RX 9070 XT uses two 8-pin power connectors, while the LX MAX uses a single 16-pin connector.

Q: How do the shading unit counts compare?

A: The LX MAX has 6144 shading units. The RX 9070 XT has 4096 shading units. The LX MAX has 192 texture mapping units and 96 ROPs, while the RX 9070 XT has 256 TMUs and 128 ROPs.

Q: Which card supports a newer PCIe interface?

A: The RX 9070 XT uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every recorded specification. The RX 9070 XT uses the Navi 48 chip on a 4 nm process from TSMC. The LX MAX uses the 7G106 chip on a 6 nm process, also from TSMC. The RX 9070 XT has 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 151.0M per mm². The LX MAX has unknown transistor count, unknown die size, and no recorded density.

The RX 9070 XT has 4096 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 128 ROPs. The LX MAX has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The RX 9070 XT has 64 ray tracing cores. The LX MAX has no recorded ray tracing cores. Neither card lists tensor cores.

Clock behavior differs. The RX 9070 XT has a base clock of 1660 MHz, a boost clock of 2970 MHz, and a game clock of 2400 MHz. The LX MAX has no base, boost, or game clock recorded. The RX 9070 XT memory clock is 2518 MHz with 20.1 Gbps effective. The LX MAX memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Memory configuration: RX 9070 XT uses 16 GB GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 644.6 GB/s bandwidth. LX MAX uses 12 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Pixel rate is 380.2 GPixel/s for the RX 9070 XT and 192.0 GPixel/s for the LX MAX. Texture rate is 760.3 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.

Power and physical specifications: RX 9070 XT draws 304 W, requires a 700 W PSU, uses two 8-pin connectors, and is dual-slot. LX MAX draws 225 W, requires a 550 W PSU, uses one 16-pin connector, and is dual-slot. The LX MAX measures 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm. The RX 9070 XT has no recorded dimensions.

Display outputs: RX 9070 XT has one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1a outputs. LX MAX has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The RX 9070 XT supports PCIe 5.0 x16. The LX MAX supports PCIe 4.0 x16.

API support: both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 9070 XT supports Vulkan 1.4. The LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

Release and pricing data: RX 9070 XT released on 2025-03-05 with a launch MSRP of 599 USD. LX MAX released on 2026-03-16 with no launch MSRP recorded. The RX 9070 XT’s predecessor is Navi III. The LX MAX has no predecessor listed.

Architecture Differences

The RX 9070 XT is built on RDNA 4.0 architecture and belongs to the Navi IV (RX 9000) generation. The LX MAX uses the TrueGPU architecture and belongs to the 7G100 generation. These are entirely different design families.

The manufacturing process differs by node size. The RX 9070 XT uses TSMC’s 4 nm process. The LX MAX uses TSMC’s 6 nm process. The RX 9070 XT has a transistor count of 53,900 million, while the LX MAX’s transistor count is unknown. The RX 9070 XT die area is 357 mm², while the LX MAX die size is unknown.

Shading architecture differs substantially. The RX 9070 XT has 4096 shading units, the LX MAX has 6144. The RX 9070 XT’s TMU count is 256, the LX MAX’s is 192. The RX 9070 XT’s ROP count is 128, the LX MAX’s is 96. Ray tracing hardware is present on the RX 9070 XT with 64 RT cores. The LX MAX has no recorded RT core count.

Compute ratios differ. The RX 9070 XT’s FP16 rate equals its FP32 rate at 48.66 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The LX MAX’s FP16 rate is 49.15 TFLOPS against an FP32 rate of 24.58 TFLOPS, indicating a 2:1 ratio. The LX MAX therefore has higher FP16 throughput than FP32, while the RX 9070 XT has equal throughput in both.

The RX 9070 XT has no recorded codename. The LX MAX also has no recorded codename. The RX 9070 XT’s production status is Active, and the LX MAX’s production status is also Active.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT as the only one of the two with measured performance. Its average benchmark score is 13543, placing it at the 55th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals in the database are all within 1% of its average score, indicating the RX 9070 XT sits in a competitive cluster rather than at the top of the performance stack.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no benchmark scores and no rival comparisons. Its 50th percentile rank is a positional estimate, not a measured result. The specifications suggest a lower compute ceiling: 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 versus 48.66 TFLOPS, 432.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 644.6 GB/s, and 12 GB memory versus 16 GB. The LX MAX does have more shading units at 6144 versus 4096, and its FP16 rate of 49.15 TFLOPS slightly exceeds the RX 9070 XT’s 48.66 TFLOPS.

The RX 9070 XT is the appropriate choice for applications that rely on measured performance, ray tracing, higher memory bandwidth, newer PCIe generation, and DisplayPort 2.1a output. The LX MAX offers lower power draw at 225 W, a smaller physical footprint with recorded dimensions, a single 16-pin power connector, and a lower suggested PSU requirement of 550 W.

For a builder prioritizing verified benchmark results and higher throughput across FP32, pixel rate, texture rate, and memory bandwidth, the RX 9070 XT is the clear selection. For a builder prioritizing lower power draw, a compact dual-slot card, and a later release date, the LX MAX has appeal, but its lack of recorded benchmark data prevents any performance validation. The database contains no evidence of LX MAX performance, so any decision in its favor rests on specifications alone.