AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded data shows a clear split between these two GPUs, with each dominating in different workload categories. Out of nine shared benchmark tests, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT takes six wins while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile takes three. However, the margin of victory in each direction tells the more important story.
The most dramatic result appears in Geekbench OpenCL, where the NVIDIA mobile part scores 143870 against AMD's 17428. That is a 87.9% advantage for NVIDIA, the single largest delta in the entire comparison. The Geekbench Vulkan test also goes to NVIDIA, with 139213 versus 65879, a 52.7% lead. These are not close contests; the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is roughly twice as fast as the RX 9070 XT in those compute-oriented workloads.
The PassMark suite paints a different picture. The RX 9070 XT wins PassMark G3D with a score of 26795 against 24004, an 11.6% margin. In PassMark GPU Compute, AMD extends that lead to 57.1%, scoring 15864 versus 10101. The older DirectX API tests also favor AMD: DirectX 9 shows 353 versus 259, a 36.3% lead, and DirectX 11 shows 292 versus 237, a 23.2% lead. DirectX 10 is nearly a tie, with AMD ahead by only 2% (154 versus 151). The 2D PassMark test goes to AMD at 1328 versus 981, a 35.4% gap. NVIDIA does take PassMark DirectX 12, scoring 102 versus 78, a 23.5% advantage.
The average benchmark score in the database places the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile at 35435, well above the RX 9070 XT's 13543. The NVIDIA part sits at the 80th percentile of all GPUs, while the AMD part sits at the 55th percentile. The nearest rivals in the database confirm this positioning: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile trades within 2.4% of cards like the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 (35520, -0.2%), the AMD Radeon Pro Duo (35860, -1.2%), and the NVIDIA T1000 (36289, -2.4%). The RX 9070 XT, by contrast, is essentially tied with much older parts like the AMD Radeon HD 7770M (13536, 0.1%) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 (13515, 0.2%).
There is an apparent contradiction in these numbers. The RX 9070 XT wins six of nine head-to-head tests, yet its average score is far lower. The explanation lies in the weighting of the average: the NVIDIA card's enormous Geekbench scores dominate its aggregate, while AMD's wins are mostly in tests with smaller absolute score ranges. The data indicates that neither card is universally faster; each has a distinct performance profile.
Architecture Differences
The two GPUs come from different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT uses the Navi 48 chip built on RDNA 4.0 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the GB205 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture, also from TSMC but on a 5 nm process. The process node difference is small, but the transistor counts diverge sharply. AMD packs 53,900 million transistors into a 357 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 151.0 million per square millimeter. NVIDIA fits 31,100 million transistors onto a 263 mm² die, for a density of 118.3 million per square millimeter.
Memory configurations differ in type and capacity. The RX 9070 XT carries 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256 bit bus, with bandwidth rated at 644.6 GB/s. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192 bit bus, with bandwidth at 672.0 GB/s. Despite having less memory and a narrower bus, the mobile NVIDIA part achieves slightly higher bandwidth thanks to its faster 28 Gbps effective memory speed, versus 20.1 Gbps effective on the AMD card.
Core counts also go in opposite directions. The NVIDIA GPU has more shading units at 5888, compared to 4096 on the AMD card, and it includes 184 tensor cores and 46 RT cores. The AMD GPU has 256 texture mapping units and 128 ROPs, while NVIDIA has 184 TMUs and 80 ROPs. AMD reports 64 RT cores, but no tensor core count. Clock speeds are dramatically different: the RX 9070 XT runs a 1660 MHz base and 2970 MHz boost, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile runs a much lower 847 MHz base and 1447 MHz boost. The AMD card also lists a 2400 MHz game clock, a figure NVIDIA does not provide.
The power envelope explains some of this. The RX 9070 XT is rated at 304 W TDP, requires a dual-slot cooler, and needs two 8-pin power connectors with a suggested 700 W PSU. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is rated at 60 W TDP, is an IGP (integrated graphics package) with no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU. This is a desktop part versus a laptop part, and the thermal and power budgets reflect that. The AMD GPU's higher clocks and larger die come at the cost of much higher power draw.
Both cards support PCIe 5.0 x16 and the same API levels: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Display outputs differ, with AMD providing 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a, while NVIDIA's outputs are listed as portable device dependent. The RX 9070 XT released on March 5, 2025, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile released slightly earlier on February 28, 2025.
Where Each One Wins
The RX 9070 XT wins in traditional rasterization and legacy API workloads. Its PassMark G3D score of 26795 and PassMark GPU Compute score of 15864 indicate strong performance in DirectX 11 and compute tasks that use older programming models. The DirectX 9 result (353 versus 259) and DirectX 10 result (154 versus 151) show AMD holds an edge in backward compatibility with older games and applications. The 2D score of 1328 versus 981 also suggests better desktop composition and 2D rendering performance.
The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins in modern compute-heavy benchmarks. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 143870 is in a different class entirely, and the Vulkan score of 139213 confirms NVIDIA's advantage in cross-platform compute and modern graphics APIs. The DirectX 12 result (102 versus 78) also goes to NVIDIA, pointing to better performance in current-generation games that use DX12 features. The presence of 184 tensor cores on the NVIDIA part, absent on AMD, suggests this compute advantage extends to AI and machine learning workloads, though the database does not include specific tensor performance tests.
For a desktop user playing older or lightly threaded titles, the RX 9070 XT delivers better results in the recorded benchmarks. For a laptop user running modern compute workloads, Vulkan applications, or OpenCL tasks, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the clear winner. The 60 W TDP of the NVIDIA part also means it can operate in thin-and-light chassis, while the 304 W AMD card requires a full desktop power delivery system.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has an average benchmark score of 35435, compared to 13543 for the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT. The NVIDIA card also ranks in the 80th percentile of all GPUs, while AMD ranks in the 55th percentile.
Q: Does the AMD card beat NVIDIA in any major 3D benchmark?
A: Yes, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT wins PassMark G3D with a score of 26795, an 11.6% lead over the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 24004. AMD also wins PassMark GPU Compute by 57.1% (15864 versus 10101).
Q: Why does the NVIDIA card have a lower TDP yet higher clock-independent performance?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is rated at 60 W TDP versus 304 W for the RX 9070 XT, but it uses a different architecture, Blackwell 2.0, with 5888 shading units and 184 tensor cores. Its boost clock is lower (1447 MHz versus 2970 MHz), but its memory bandwidth is slightly higher at 672.0 GB/s versus 644.6 GB/s.
Q: How much memory does each GPU have?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256 bit bus. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192 bit bus.
Q: Which GPU has better DirectX 12 performance?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins the PassMark DirectX 12 test with a score of 102, a 23.5% advantage over the RX 9070 XT's 78.
Q: Are these GPUs on the same manufacturing process?
A: No, both are made by TSMC, but the RX 9070 XT uses a 4 nm process while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses a 5 nm process. AMD's die is also larger at 357 mm² versus 263 mm².
The Verdict
The data describes two products built for different environments and different priorities. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is a 304 W desktop card with 16 GB of memory, a 4 nm process, and a 2970 MHz boost clock. It wins six of nine head-to-head tests, including all legacy DirectX benchmarks, G3D, GPU compute, and 2D performance. Its launch MSRP is 599 USD. It is the stronger choice for users who prioritize rasterization throughput, older API compatibility, and compute workloads that scale well across its 4096 shading units.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is a 60 W integrated mobile GPU with 12 GB of GDDR7, 5888 shading units, 184 tensor cores, and a 1447 MHz boost clock. It wins Geekbench OpenCL by 87.9%, Geekbench Vulkan by 52.7%, and PassMark DirectX 12 by 23.5%. Its average benchmark score is more than double AMD's, and it ranks 25 percentile points higher in the overall GPU distribution. It is the stronger choice for modern compute APIs, Vulkan-based workloads, and any scenario where power draw must stay low.
The specification differences are stark, and the benchmark splits follow those differences. Rasterization-heavy legacy workloads favor AMD. Compute-heavy modern workloads favor NVIDIA. The choice between them depends entirely on which set of benchmarks matches the intended use case.
Specification Differences
| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors | 53,900 million | 31,100 million |
| Die Size | 357 mm² | 263 mm² |
| Transistor Density | 151.0M / mm² | 118.3M / mm² |
| Base Clock | 1660 MHz | 847 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2970 MHz | 1447 MHz |
| Game Clock | 2400 MHz | None |
| Memory Size | 16 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bus | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 644.6 GB/s | 672.0 GB/s |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 5888 |
| TMUs | 256 | 184 |
| ROPs | 128 | 80 |
| RT Cores | 64 | 46 |
| Tensor Cores | None | 184 |
| Pixel Rate | 380.2 GPixel/s | 115.8 GPixel/s |
| Texture Rate | 760.3 GTexel/s | 266.2 GTexel/s |
| FP32 | 48.66 TFLOPS | 17.04 TFLOPS |
| FP16 | 48.66 TFLOPS (1:1) | 17.04 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| TDP | 304 W | 60 W |
| Slot Width | Dual-slot | IGP |
| Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
| Suggested PSU | 700 W | None |
| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a | Portable Device Dependent |
| Release Date | 2025-03-05 | 2025-02-28 |
| Launch MSRP | 599 USD | None |