AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE vs Intel Arc Pro B370 Comparison
AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE
Arc Pro B370
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE vs Intel Arc Pro B370
Where Each One Wins
The recorded data splits this comparison into two very different usage domains. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is a dedicated add-in board with discrete memory, a 220 W power envelope, and a full suite of measured benchmark scores. The Intel Arc Pro B370 is an integrated graphics processor inside the Panther Lake chip, sharing system memory, drawing 25 W, and carrying no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The AMD part wins every measurable performance comparison by definition, since the Intel part has no entries in the benchmark database.
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5424 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 109309. Its average benchmark score across the database sits at 57367. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has an average benchmark score of 0, which reflects the absence of recorded results rather than a literal zero-performance outcome. The database does not contain any head-to-head benchmark entries between the two, and the win counters for both parts remain at zero.
For use-case analysis, the AMD card targets high-throughput rasterization and ray tracing workloads. Its 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, and 48 ray tracing cores give it a hardware resource profile suited to demanding 3D rendering. The Intel part, by contrast, fits into portable or low-power systems where its 25 W TDP and integrated nature are the primary design considerations. The data shows no scenario where the Intel parts recorded scores exceed those of the AMD card.
Architecture Differences
The two processors come from different foundries and different design generations. AMD uses TSMC's 4 nm process for the Navi 48 chip, which belongs to the RDNA 4.0 architecture and the Navi IV (RX 9000) generation. Intel uses its own 3 nm process for the Panther Lake chip, built on the Xe3-LPG architecture and designated Arc Graphics-WM (Panther Lake). The AMD die measures 357 mm² and contains 53,900 million transistors, giving a transistor density of 151.0M per mm². Intel does not report transistor count, die size, or density for the Arc Pro B370.
Shading resources differ sharply. The AMD card has 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 48 RT cores. The Intel part has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores. Those raw counts translate into large throughput gaps. AMD's pixel rate is 267.8 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s for Intel, a factor of more than five. AMD's texture rate is 535.7 GTexel/s versus 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 compute measures 34.28 TFLOPS on the AMD side against 6.144 TFLOPS on the Intel side. For FP16, AMD delivers 34.28 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while Intel reaches 12.29 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio.
Memory architecture is fundamentally different. AMD uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Intel uses system-shared memory with a system-dependent bus width and bandwidth, with the memory type listed as system shared. Clock behavior also differs. AMD lists a base clock of 1420 MHz, a boost of 2790 MHz, and a game clock of 2220 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective. Intel lists a base of 300 MHz and a boost of 2400 MHz, with no game clock and no independent memory clock.
Power and physical design separate the two completely. AMD is a dual-slot card requiring two 8-pin power connectors and a suggested 550 W power supply, with a 220 W TDP. Intel is an integrated graphics processor with no power connectors, no suggested PSU rating, and a 25 W TDP. AMD connects via PCIe 5.0 x16; Intel uses an IGP bus interface. Display outputs on the AMD card include one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1a connections, while the Intel part's outputs are described as portable device dependent. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE and the Intel Arc Pro B370. The AMD card's standalone results nevertheless provide the only quantitative performance reference. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the AMD card scores 5424, which places it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its Geekbench OpenCL result of 109309 reinforces that compute positioning. The Intel Arc Pro B370 holds the 50th percentile with no recorded scores.
The AMD card's nearest rivals in the database illustrate where its average score of 57367 lands relative to other hardware. The Intel Arc A580 averages 57756, which is 0.7% higher than the AMD card. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM averages 58085, 1.2% higher. The Intel Arc A570M averages 58239, 1.5% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT averages 58392, 1.8% higher. These deltas show the RX 9070 GRE sitting just below a small cluster of other graphics products in aggregate benchmark averages, despite its strong percentile ranking.
Because the Intel Arc Pro B370 has no benchmark scores, no delta percentages can be calculated against it. The data cannot support any claim of a specific performance margin between the two parts. What the data does show is that the AMD card is a discrete, high-throughput product with substantial compute resources, while the Intel part is a low-power integrated solution with no measured results in the database. Any user comparing the two on benchmarks alone will find data only for the AMD side.
FAQ
Q: Does the Intel Arc Pro B370 have any benchmark scores in the database?
A: No. The Intel Arc Pro B370 has an empty benchmarks list, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals recorded.
Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE rank among all GPUs?
A: It sits in the 87th percentile of all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 57367.
Q: What process nodes do the two processors use?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE uses TSMC's 4 nm process, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 uses Intel's 3 nm process.
Q: What is the memory configuration of each part?
A: The AMD card has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.
Q: What are the power requirements for each?
A: The AMD card has a 220 W TDP, uses two 8-pin power connectors, and suggests a 550 W power supply. The Intel part has a 25 W TDP, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU rating.
Q: Which part has more ray tracing cores?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE has 48 ray tracing cores, while the Intel Arc Pro B370 has 10 ray tracing cores.
The Verdict
The data supports a clear division. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is the only one of the two with recorded performance results, and those results describe a high-end discrete graphics card. Its 34.28 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 432.0 GB/s of dedicated memory bandwidth, and 87th percentile ranking make it the appropriate choice for applications that demand substantial rendering or compute throughput. The Intel Arc Pro B370, with its 25 W TDP, integrated design, and system-shared memory, belongs to a different category entirely: low-power, portable, or space-constrained systems where a discrete card cannot be installed.
No head-to-head benchmark data exists, so the database cannot quantify a performance gap between them. The architectural differences alone, however, place them in different classes. The AMD card carries 3072 shading units, a dual-slot cooler, and a 550 W suggested power supply. The Intel part carries 1280 shading units, no cooler beyond the integrated solution, and no power supply requirement. Users who need a discrete GPU with a full complement of display outputs, including one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1a, should select the AMD card. Users who need graphics built into a processor with minimal power draw should select the Intel part.
The AMD card's nearest rivals in the database, all within 1.8% of its average score, show that its aggregate performance aligns closely with a group of other mid-to-high-range products. That context matters for anyone positioning the RX 9070 GRE against alternatives in the same performance neighborhood. The Intel part has no such context in the database, which limits what can be said about its relative standing.
Specification Differences
| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE | Intel Arc Pro B370 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | Xe3-LPG |
| Process node | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |
| Transistors | 53,900 million | unknown |
| Die size | 357 mm² | unknown |
| Shading units | 3072 | 1280 |
| TMUs | 192 | 40 |
| ROPs | 96 | 20 |
| RT cores | 48 | 10 |
| Base clock | 1420 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock | 2790 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Game clock | 2220 MHz | none |
| Memory size | 12 GB | System Shared |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | System Shared |
| Memory bus | 192 bit | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | System Dependent |
| Pixel rate | 267.8 GPixel/s | 48.00 GPixel/s |
| Texture rate | 535.7 GTexel/s | 96.00 GTexel/s |
| FP32 | 34.28 TFLOPS | 6.144 TFLOPS |
| FP16 | 34.28 TFLOPS (1:1) | 12.29 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| TDP | 220 W | 25 W |
| Slot width | Dual-slot | IGP |
| Power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
| Suggested PSU | 550 W | none |
| Bus interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | IGP |
| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a | Portable Device Dependent |
| Release date | 2025-05-07 | 2026-01-26 |
| Launch MSRP | 549 USD | none |
| Percentile (all GPUs) | 87 | 50 |
| Average benchmark score | 57367 | 0 |