AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Comparison

# AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti

The head-to-head data between the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti shows a clear pattern, but the underlying specifications tell a more nuanced story. Across the two directly comparable benchmark tests, NVIDIA's card wins both, yet the magnitude of those victories varies dramatically by workload type. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the RTX 5070 Ti scores 6604 against the RX 9070 GRE's 5424, a 17.9% advantage. That is a substantial lead, but it pales next to the Geekbench OpenCL result, where the RTX 5070 Ti's 212,363 score nearly doubles the AMD card's 109,309, representing a 48.5% gap. These two data points suggest that the NVIDIA card is not just faster; it is disproportionately faster in compute-heavy scenarios, which invites a closer look at what each architecture prioritizes.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test is the more gaming-oriented of the two shared benchmarks, and it shows the RTX 5070 Ti holding a decisive but not overwhelming edge. With a delta of -17.9% for the RX 9070 GRE, the NVIDIA card delivers roughly 22% more performance in this synthetic rasterization workload. That translates to a tangible frame-rate advantage in real-world gaming scenarios, though the AMD card remains competitive enough to be considered a viable alternative for pure rasterization play. The Geekbench OpenCL result, however, is where the gap becomes lopsided. The RTX 5070 Ti's 212,363 score versus 109,309 for the RX 9070 GRE means the NVIDIA card is nearly 95% faster in this general-purpose compute benchmark. This is not a marginal difference; it is a fundamental performance chasm that points to architectural strengths beyond simple clock-speed or core-count advantages.

Notably, the RX 9070 GRE's average benchmark score across all tests is 57,367, which actually exceeds the RTX 5070 Ti's 49,957 average. This inversion is curious: the NVIDIA card wins the two head-to-head tests decisively, yet its overall average is dragged down by other benchmarks in its profile, likely the Passmark DX9, DX10, DX11, and DX12 tests where scores range from 127 to 351. Those low DirectX scores suggest the RTX 5070 Ti's Passmark results may not reflect its true gaming potential, or that the test suite favors the AMD card's driver optimizations in legacy API paths. The percentile rankings are nearly identical—87th for AMD versus 86th for NVIDIA—which places both cards in the upper echelon of all GPUs, but the delta between their head-to-head scores and their aggregate averages creates an analytical puzzle.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti wins in every directly comparable benchmark, meaning there is no test in the head-to-head set where the RX 9070 GRE comes out ahead. That said, the nature of the wins matters. In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the NVIDIA card's 17.9% lead is significant but not insurmountable; a user prioritizing high-refresh 1440p or entry-level 4K gaming would notice the difference, but the AMD card would still deliver playable performance. The Geekbench OpenCL result tells a different story: a 48.5% deficit for AMD means the RX 9070 GRE is effectively outclassed in any compute-heavy application, including GPU-accelerated rendering, scientific simulations, or machine learning inference. For users whose primary workload is compute, the RTX 5070 Ti is the only rational choice from this pairing.

For gaming specifically, the data suggests the RTX 5070 Ti holds a comfortable lead, but the RX 9070 GRE's higher average benchmark score hints that its overall package might be more balanced across a broader range of tests. The AMD card's nearest rivals include the Intel Arc A580 (delta -0.7%) and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (delta -1.8%), which implies the RX 9070 GRE sits in a performance tier where its closest competitors are previous-generation flagship cards. The RTX 5070 Ti, by contrast, finds its nearest rivals among older AMD high-end cards like the RX 6900 XT (delta -2%) and RX 6800 XT (delta 3.1%), suggesting it occupies a similar performance band but with a different competitive landscape. The practical takeaway: if your benchmark of choice is OpenCL or compute-heavy, the RTX 5070 Ti wins outright; if you are gaming in DX12, it still wins, but the RX 9070 GRE remains within striking distance.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two cards is stark, starting with the manufacturing process. The RX 9070 GRE uses a 4 nm TSMC node, while the RTX 5070 Ti uses a 5 nm TSMC node—a subtle but meaningful difference in transistor density. AMD's Navi 48 chip packs 53,900 million transistors into a 357 mm² die, yielding a density of 151.0 million transistors per mm². NVIDIA's GB203 chip contains 45,600 million transistors on a larger 378 mm² die, resulting in a lower density of 120.6 million per mm². Despite having fewer transistors, the RTX 5070 Ti achieves higher raw performance, which speaks to NVIDIA's architectural efficiency in this generation.

The compute resources diverge sharply. The RX 9070 GRE has 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs, alongside 48 ray-tracing cores and no dedicated tensor cores. The RTX 5070 Ti counters with 8,960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores—nearly three times the shading units and more than double the RT and tensor core counts. This explains the OpenCL gap: the NVIDIA card has vastly more parallel compute hardware to throw at general-purpose workloads. Clock speeds also differ, with the AMD card boosting to 2790 MHz versus NVIDIA's 2452 MHz boost, but the AMD card's higher clock cannot compensate for its 65% fewer shading units.

Memory configurations further separate the two. The RX 9070 GRE has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, nearly doubling bandwidth to 896.0 GB/s. This memory advantage is critical for high-resolution textures and compute workloads that demand large, fast data transfers. The RTX 5070 Ti also features a 16-pin power connector and a 300 W TDP, versus the RX 9070 GRE's dual 8-pin connectors and 220 W TDP—a power draw difference that likely contributes to its higher sustained performance. Both cards share PCIe 5.0 x16 interfaces and identical API support (DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.4), but NVIDIA's DisplayPort 2.1b outputs edge out AMD's DisplayPort 2.1a on the display connectivity front.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the benchmark data, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the faster card in every head-to-head comparison, with a 17.9% lead in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and a 48.5% lead in Geekbench OpenCL. The architectural evidence supports this: the RTX 5070 Ti's 8,960 shading units, 280 tensor cores, and 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are overwhelming advantages over the RX 9070 GRE's 3,072 shading units, lack of tensor cores, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. For any user whose workload involves GPU compute, ray tracing, or high-resolution gaming with large texture sets, the RTX 5070 Ti is the clear choice from this pairing.

The RX 9070 GRE, however, should not be dismissed outright. Its higher average benchmark score (57,367 versus 49,957) and its 87th percentile ranking suggest it performs admirably across a broader suite of tests, even if it loses the two head-to-head matchups. Its lower 220 W TDP and dual 8-pin power connectors make it a more power-efficient option, and its 4 nm process node gives it a transistor-density advantage that could pay off in thermally constrained systems. The launch MSRP for the RX 9070 GRE is 549 USD, while the RTX 5070 Ti launches at 749 USD—a price differential that reflects their performance gap but also leaves room for the AMD card to appeal to users who prioritize efficiency or have power-supply limitations. If your benchmark is 3DMark Steel Nomad or any compute test, the RTX 5070 Ti wins. If you need a balanced GPU with lower power draw and a smaller price tag, the RX 9070 GRE remains a defensible option, provided you accept its compute limitations.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU wins in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti wins with a score of 6604 versus 5424 for the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, a 17.9% advantage.

Q: How large is the performance gap in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti scores 212,363 compared to the RX 9070 GRE's 109,309, a 48.5% deficit for the AMD card.

Q: Does the RX 9070 GRE have any benchmark where it beats the RTX 5070 Ti?

A: No. In the two head-to-head benchmarks available (3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and Geekbench OpenCL), the RTX 5070 Ti wins both, giving it a 2-0 record.

Q: What are the memory specifications for each card?

A: The RX 9070 GRE has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How do the shading unit counts compare?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has 8,960 shading units, while the RX 9070 GRE has 3,072—a nearly 3x difference in favor of NVIDIA.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The RX 9070 GRE has a 220 W TDP with dual 8-pin connectors, while the RTX 5070 Ti has a 300 W TDP with a single 16-pin connector. The AMD card requires a 550 W PSU, while the NVIDIA card needs a 700 W PSU.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 53,900 million | 45,600 million |

| Die Size | 357 mm² | 378 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 151.0M / mm² | 120.6M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1420 MHz | 2295 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2790 MHz | 2452 MHz |

| Game Clock | 2220 MHz | N/A |

| Memory Size | 12 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus Width | 192 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 896.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 3072 | 8960 |

| TMUs | 192 | 280 |

| RT Cores | 48 | 70 |

| Tensor Cores | N/A | 280 |

| Pixel Rate | 267.8 GPixel/s | 235.4 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 535.7 GTexel/s | 686.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 34.28 TFLOPS | 43.94 TFLOPS |

| TDP | 220 W | 300 W |

| Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 550 W | 700 W |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| Dimensions (LxHxW) | N/A | 304 mm x 137 mm x 48 mm |

| Release Date | 2025-05-07 | 2025-02-19 |

| Launch MSRP | 549 USD | 749 USD |