AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile Comparison
AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE
GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile
The benchmark database places these two GPUs in different performance strata, with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE holding a commanding lead across every recorded test. The RX 9070 GRE wins both head-to-head benchmarks, with a 129.3% advantage in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 and a 29.9% lead in Geekbench OpenCL. The data shows a desktop-class part against a mobile-focused competitor, where the RX 9070 GRE delivers roughly double the raw performance in the primary gaming workload, while the RTX 5050 Mobile offers a far more power-efficient package for thin-and-light laptops.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE is the clear winner for demanding desktop gaming and compute workloads. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5424 points places it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs in the database, while its Geekbench OpenCL score of 109309 confirms strong general-purpose compute capability. The RX 9070 GRE wins both head-to-head benchmarks outright, making it the superior choice for users prioritizing maximum frame rates in modern DirectX 12 titles or running OpenCL-accelerated applications. Its average benchmark score of 57367 sits comfortably above the RTX 5050 Mobile’s 43268, reinforcing its position as a higher-tier performer.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile, by contrast, wins in the efficiency and form-factor domain, though the database records no benchmark victories for it. With a TDP of 50 W compared to the RX 9070 GRE’s 220 W, the RTX 5050 Mobile draws less than a quarter of the power while still delivering an 83rd percentile ranking among all GPUs. Its IGP slot width and lack of power connectors make it suitable for portable devices, where the RX 9070 GRE’s dual-slot design and 2x 8-pin connectors are not viable. For users who need a GPU that fits in a laptop without external power, the RTX 5050 Mobile is the only option between the two, even though it consistently trails in raw performance.
The use-case split is stark: the RX 9070 GRE for desktop builders who want maximum performance per benchmark score, and the RTX 5050 Mobile for mobile users who prioritize portability and low power draw over frame rates. The data shows no scenario where the RTX 5050 Mobile outperforms the RX 9070 GRE in the recorded tests, so the choice comes down to platform constraints rather than performance preference.
Architecture Differences
The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and process nodes. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE uses the Navi 48 chip built on RDNA 4.0 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It packs 53,900 million transistors into a 357 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 151.0M per mm². The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile uses the GB207 chip on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, also fabricated at TSMC but on a 5 nm process. It contains 16,900 million transistors on a 149 mm² die, with a lower density of 113.4M per mm².
Memory configurations differ substantially. The RX 9070 GRE offers 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5050 Mobile provides 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding 384.0 GB/s. Despite the newer GDDR7 memory type, the RTX 5050 Mobile has less capacity and lower bandwidth, which partially explains its weaker benchmark performance.
The compute resources also diverge. The RX 9070 GRE features 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs, along with 48 ray tracing cores. The RTX 5050 Mobile has 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with 20 ray tracing cores and 80 tensor cores. The RX 9070 GRE’s larger ROP count contributes to its pixel rate of 267.8 GPixel/s versus 48.00 GPixel/s for the RTX 5050 Mobile, a 5.6x difference. Texture rate follows a similar pattern: 535.7 GTexel/s for AMD versus 120.0 GTexel/s for NVIDIA.
Clock speeds favor AMD in absolute terms. The RX 9070 GRE runs at a base clock of 1420 MHz and boosts to 2790 MHz, with a game clock of 2220 MHz. The RTX 5050 Mobile operates at a base of 1020 MHz and boosts to 1500 MHz. Memory clocks differ as well: the RX 9070 GRE runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), while the RTX 5050 Mobile runs at 1500 MHz (24 Gbps effective), the latter achieving higher per-pin data rates despite the lower clock.
Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and both use a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface. The RX 9070 GRE provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1a outputs, while the RTX 5050 Mobile’s display outputs are portable device dependent, reflecting its mobile nature. The RX 9070 GRE’s FP32 throughput is 34.28 TFLOPS, compared to 7.680 TFLOPS for the RTX 5050 Mobile, with both offering 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratios.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test shows the largest gap between the two GPUs. The RX 9070 GRE scores 5424 points, while the RTX 5050 Mobile scores 2365 points, giving AMD a 129.3% advantage. This means the RX 9070 GRE delivers more than twice the performance in this DirectX 12 gaming workload. The score difference of 3059 points is substantial and reflects the RX 9070 GRE’s higher shading unit count, faster clocks, and larger memory bandwidth.
In Geekbench OpenCL, the RX 9070 GRE scores 109309 points against 84171 points for the RTX 5050 Mobile, a 29.9% lead. The delta of 25138 points is notable but smaller in percentage terms than the Steel Nomad result, suggesting the RTX 5050 Mobile is relatively closer in compute tasks than in gaming-specific workloads. This pattern indicates that the RX 9070 GRE’s advantage grows in graphics-intensive applications, while its compute lead, while still decisive, is more moderate.
The average benchmark scores reinforce this hierarchy. The RX 9070 GRE averages 57367 points across the database, while the RTX 5050 Mobile averages 43268 points. The RX 9070 GRE’s nearest rivals include the Intel Arc A580 at 57756 points (0.7% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM at 58085 points (1.2% ahead), and the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT at 58392 points (1.8% ahead), showing the RX 9070 GRE sits just below a cluster of similar-performing GPUs. The RTX 5050 Mobile’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB at 43262 points (equal), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER at 43223 points (0.1% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile at 43667 points (0.9% ahead), indicating it performs in line with these established parts.
The Verdict
The data unambiguously favors the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE for anyone who can accommodate a desktop GPU. Its 129.3% lead in 3DMark Steel Nomad and 29.9% lead in Geekbench OpenCL make it the stronger choice for gaming and compute, with a 90th-percentile-class performance profile (87th percentile) versus the RTX 5050 Mobile’s 83rd percentile. The RX 9070 GRE offers 12 GB of memory, higher bandwidth, more than double the FP32 throughput, and a significantly larger transistor budget, all contributing to its dominant benchmark results.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile is the appropriate pick only when the platform demands it. Its 50 W TDP, IGP form factor, and lack of power connectors make it the sole viable option for ultraportable laptops where the RX 9070 GRE’s 220 W TDP and dual-slot design are impossible. The RTX 5050 Mobile still delivers respectable performance, ranking in the 83rd percentile, but it trails the RX 9070 GRE in every recorded metric. Users who need a laptop GPU should accept the performance trade-off; users who can choose a desktop part should select the RX 9070 GRE without hesitation.
There is no benchmark in the database where the RTX 5050 Mobile wins, so the verdict is conditional: the RX 9070 GRE for performance, the RTX 5050 Mobile for portability. The launch MSRP of 549 USD for the RX 9070 GRE provides a reference point for desktop pricing, while the RTX 5050 Mobile has no recorded launch MSRP, reflecting its integration into pre-built laptops.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has a higher 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE scores 5424 points, which is 129.3% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile’s 2365 points.
Q: What is the memory capacity difference between the two GPUs?
A: The RX 9070 GRE has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, while the RTX 5050 Mobile has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus.
Q: How do their power requirements compare?
A: The RX 9070 GRE has a TDP of 220 W and requires a 550 W suggested PSU with 2x 8-pin connectors, while the RTX 5050 Mobile has a TDP of 50 W and uses no power connectors.
Q: Which GPU has better compute performance in Geekbench OpenCL?
A: The RX 9070 GRE scores 109309 points, leading the RTX 5050 Mobile’s 84171 points by 29.9%.
Q: Are both GPUs based on the same process node?
A: No, the RX 9070 GRE uses a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the RTX 5050 Mobile uses a 5 nm process at the same foundry.
Q: What is the FP32 throughput of each GPU?
A: The RX 9070 GRE delivers 34.28 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, compared to 7.680 TFLOPS for the RTX 5050 Mobile.
Specification Differences
| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistors | 53,900 million | 16,900 million |
| Die Size | 357 mm² | 149 mm² |
| Transistor Density | 151.0M / mm² | 113.4M / mm² |
| Base Clock | 1420 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2790 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Game Clock | 2220 MHz | None |
| Memory Size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bus Width | 192 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432.0 GB/s | 384.0 GB/s |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 2560 |
| TMUs | 192 | 80 |
| ROPs | 96 | 32 |
| RT Cores | 48 | 20 |
| Tensor Cores | None | 80 |
| Pixel Rate | 267.8 GPixel/s | 48.00 GPixel/s |
| Texture Rate | 535.7 GTexel/s | 120.0 GTexel/s |
| FP32 | 34.28 TFLOPS | 7.680 TFLOPS |
| FP16 | 34.28 TFLOPS (1:1) | 7.680 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| TDP | 220 W | 50 W |
| Slot Width | Dual-slot | IGP |
| Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
| Suggested PSU | 550 W | None |
| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a | Portable Device Dependent |
| Release Date | 2025-05-07 | 2025-06-23 |
| Launch MSRP | 549 USD | None |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 | 5424 | 2365 |
| Geekbench OpenCL | 109309 | 84171 |
| Average Benchmark Score | 57367 | 43268 |
| Percentile vs All GPUs | 87 | 83 |