AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP vs Lisuan Tech LX MAX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a limited direct comparison set between these two cards. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP has two benchmark results in the database, while the Lisuan Tech LX MAX currently has no recorded benchmark scores. This absence of data for the LX MAX makes a traditional head-to-head score comparison impossible.

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP achieves 88,183 in Geekbench OpenCL and 39,476 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score sits at 63,830. This places the card in the 89th percentile of all GPUs in the database, indicating strong overall performance relative to the broader field.

For context, the nearest rivals to the RX 9060 XT LP show how tightly packed this performance tier is. The NVIDIA CMP 30HX averages 63,842, a 0% delta. The AMD Radeon RX 7600M scores 63,775, just 0.1% behind. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 sits at 63,693, a 0.2% gap. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 leads slightly at 64,212, showing a -0.6% delta from the RX 9060 XT LP. These numbers indicate that the RX 9060 XT LP trades blows with established mid-range cards, landing within a fraction of a percent of each rival.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX has no benchmark entries, no average score, and no nearest rivals listed. Its percentile rank is 50, which reflects the default position for a card with zero recorded results rather than a meaningful performance measurement. The database simply has no performance data to analyze for this model.

The wins column shows zero for both cards in head-to-head testing, which accurately reflects the lack of overlapping benchmark data. The AMD card has measurable results, but the Lisuan card does not. Any comparison of raw scores between these two specific products cannot be derived from the recorded information.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP demonstrates clear advantages in several measurable areas based on the database records. Its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivers 322.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX MAX offers 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, which provides 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The LX MAX has a wider memory bus and higher bandwidth, a notable advantage for memory-heavy workloads.

In raw compute throughput, the two cards are closely matched. The RX 9060 XT LP delivers 24.99 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the LX MAX produces 24.58 TFLOPS. The AMD card holds a slim lead of approximately 0.41 TFLOPS. In FP16 workloads, the situation reverses. The RX 9060 XT LP maintains 24.99 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio, while the LX MAX reaches 49.15 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, effectively doubling its FP16 output.

The LX MAX has structural advantages in its compute configuration. It uses 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The RX 9060 XT LP uses 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. Despite fewer shaders, the AMD card nearly matches the FP32 output of the LX MAX, indicating a higher per-shader efficiency in the RDNA 4.0 architecture.

The AMD card includes 32 ray tracing cores, while the LX MAX lists no RT core count. This suggests the RX 9060 XT LP has dedicated hardware for ray tracing workloads, a feature absent from the Lisuan specification. The AMD card also supports Vulkan 1.4, one version ahead of the LX MAX's Vulkan 1.3.

Power consumption strongly favors the AMD card. The RX 9060 XT LP has a 140 W TDP and requires a 300 W power supply. The LX MAX draws 225 W and needs a 550 W supply. The AMD card uses a single 8-pin connector, while the LX MAX requires a 16-pin connector. This makes the RX 9060 XT LP substantially easier to integrate into existing systems.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP uses the Navi 44 chip built on RDNA 4.0 architecture, part of the Navi IV generation. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die. The transistor density measures 149.2 million per square millimeter.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX uses a 7G106 chip with TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation. It is built on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database, preventing a direct comparison of manufacturing complexity.

The AMD card has base and boost clocks of 1,380 MHz and 3,050 MHz respectively, with a game clock of 2,450 MHz. The LX MAX has no base, boost, or game clock data recorded. Memory clocks show the AMD card at 2,518 MHz with 20.1 Gbps effective speed, while the LX MAX runs at 2,250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

The RX 9060 XT LP supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The LX MAX matches DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6 but only reaches Vulkan 1.3. Display outputs differ significantly. The AMD card provides one HDMI 2.1b port and two DisplayPort 2.1a outputs. The LX MAX offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, with no HDMI support.

The bus interface also differs. The RX 9060 XT LP uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the LX MAX uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This gives the AMD card twice the bandwidth potential for data transfers between the GPU and system.

The LX MAX has physical dimensions recorded: 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The AMD card has no dimensions listed. Both cards occupy dual-slot cooling configurations.

The Verdict

The data supports different use cases for each card. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP delivers measurable performance with an average benchmark score of 63,830, placing it in the 89th percentile. It offers 16 GB of memory, ray tracing hardware, PCIe 5.0 support, and a lower 140 W power draw. This combination suits systems with limited power delivery or those prioritizing modern API support.

The Lisuan Tech LX MAX offers higher memory bandwidth at 432.0 GB/s, a wider 192-bit bus, and double the FP16 throughput at 49.15 TFLOPS. Its 12 GB frame buffer is smaller, but the wider bus may benefit certain compute tasks. The LX MAX draws 225 W and requires a 550 W power supply, making it a heavier load on system power.

For buyers who need verified performance data, the RX 9060 XT LP has clear evidence of its capabilities. The LX MAX has no benchmark scores in the database, so its real-world performance remains undocumented. The 50th percentile ranking for the LX MAX reflects this absence of data rather than a performance assessment.

The AMD card wins on efficiency, ray tracing features, and modern connectivity. The LX MAX wins on memory bandwidth, FP16 compute, and display output count. Without benchmark data for the LX MAX, a definitive performance ranking between these two cards cannot be established from the database alone.

FAQ

Q: Which card has better raw FP32 performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP delivers 24.99 TFLOPS of FP32, slightly ahead of the Lisuan Tech LX MAX at 24.58 TFLOPS.

Q: What memory configuration does each card use?

A: The RX 9060 XT LP uses 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 322.3 GB/s bandwidth. The LX MAX uses 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX MAX support ray tracing?

A: The database lists no ray tracing core count for the LX MAX. The AMD card includes 32 dedicated ray tracing cores.

Q: What power supply is recommended for each card?

A: The RX 9060 XT LP has a 140 W TDP and suggests a 300 W power supply. The LX MAX has a 225 W TDP and suggests a 550 W power supply.

Q: Which card has better API support?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The RX 9060 XT LP supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX MAX supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: How many display outputs does each card provide?

A: The RX 9060 XT LP provides one HDMI 2.1b and two DisplayPort 2.1a outputs. The LX MAX provides four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP | Lisuan Tech LX MAX |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | TrueGPU |

| Chip | Navi 44 | 7G106 |

| Process node | 4 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 29,700 million | Unknown |

| Die size | 199 mm² | Unknown |

| Base clock | 1,380 MHz | Not listed |

| Boost clock | 3,050 MHz | Not listed |

| Game clock | 2,450 MHz | Not listed |

| Memory size | 16 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory bus | 128 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 322.3 GB/s | 432.0 GB/s |

| Memory clock | 2,518 MHz | 2,250 MHz |

| Shading units | 2,048 | 6,144 |

| TMUs | 128 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| Ray tracing cores | 32 | Not listed |

| FP32 performance | 24.99 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 performance | 24.99 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 140 W | 225 W |

| Power connector | 1x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 300 W | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan version | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | Not listed | 248 mm x 118 mm x 48 mm |

| Release date | 2025-12-16 | 2026-03-16 |