AMD Radeon RX 9060 vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents a stark contrast between these two graphics solutions. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 delivers a PassMark G3D score of 17,631, placing it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 0 and no individual benchmark entries recorded, sitting at the 50th percentile with an empty benchmark profile. This means the comparison is largely one-sided: the database contains no head-to-head benchmark results, no wins for either part, and no rival listings for the Intel integrated graphics.

The RX 9060's strength shows across multiple test suites. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 3,322. Its Geekbench OpenCL result reaches 88,183, while the Vulkan score hits 39,476. PassMark results are mixed by API generation: DirectX 9 returns 280, DirectX 10 returns 104, DirectX 11 returns 182, and DirectX 12 returns 44. The G2D score sits at 1,002, and GPU compute lands at 9,919. The average benchmark score across all tests is 16,014.

The Intel part offers no comparable numbers. With zero recorded benchmark entries, there is no way to quantify its performance relative to the RX 9060 in any specific workload. The database simply lacks the measurements. What can be stated is that the RX 9060's nearest rivals in average score include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 16,129 (0.7% behind the RX 9060), the AMD Radeon R9 370X at 15,862 (1% ahead), the AMD Radeon RX 7700 at 15,852 (1% ahead), and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 at 15,679 (2.1% ahead). These deltas show the RX 9060 clustered tightly with those discrete cards, within a range of roughly 2 percentage points.

The absence of Intel benchmark data does not mean the Intel part cannot render graphics; it means the database has no recorded measurements. The RX 9060's percentile ranking of 59 puts it above the median GPU in the database. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile's 50th percentile reflects its default position without any scored tests, not a measured performance level.

The Verdict

From the data alone, the choice is unambiguous for anyone needing measured graphics performance. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 has a substantial body of benchmark results across DirectX 9 through 12, Vulkan, OpenCL, and compute workloads. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has none. If the decision hinges on recorded performance, the RX 9060 is the only part with evidence in the database.

The RX 9060's average score of 16,014 places it alongside discrete GPUs like the RTX 3060 Ti, R9 370X, RX 7700, and Pro W5500, all within a narrow 2.1% band. That is a meaningful reference point: the RX 9060 performs in the same tier as those established cards, not above or below by a wide margin. The Intel part, with no average score, cannot be positioned relative to any of them.

For users who need an integrated solution with minimal power draw, the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a 6 W TDP and uses system shared memory. The RX 9060 is a dual-slot discrete card with a 132 W TDP and 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory. These are different product categories. The data does not suggest the RX 9060 replaces an IGP in power-constrained or portable contexts. It simply shows that the RX 9060 has measurable performance and the Intel part does not, in this database.

Architecture Differences

The RX 9060 uses the Navi 44 chip built on RDNA 4.0 architecture, with the codename Strix Point, and belongs to the Navi IV (RX 9000) generation. It is fabricated by TSMC on a 4 nm process, containing 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 149.2 million per square millimeter. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Twin Lake chip on Xe-LP architecture, belongs to the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation, and is built by Intel on a 10 nm process. Transistor count, die size, and density are listed as unknown for the Intel part.

The RX 9060 is a discrete GPU with 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. It has no tensor cores listed. The Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores listed. The RX 9060 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The API differences are small but present: the RX 9060 meets the higher 12_2 feature level versus the Intel part's 12_1.

Memory architecture diverges completely. The RX 9060 uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, and memory clocked at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The Intel part uses system shared memory, with system dependent bandwidth and no dedicated VRAM. The RX 9060's pixel rate is 191.4 GPixel/s, texture rate is 334.9 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is 21.43 TFLOPS. The Intel part's pixel rate is 4.000 GPixel/s, texture rate is 12.00 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is 384.0 GFLOPS. FP16 on the RX 9060 matches FP32 at 21.43 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio); the Intel part doubles FP16 to 768.0 GFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

Specification Differences

Clock speeds differ substantially. The RX 9060 has a base clock of 1700 MHz, boost clock of 2990 MHz, and game clock of 2400 MHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and boost clock of 1000 MHz, with no game clock listed. The RX 9060's memory clock is 2250 MHz; the Intel part's memory clock is listed as system shared.

Power and physical specifications are also distinct. The RX 9060 has a TDP of 132 W, is dual-slot, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and recommends a 300 W power supply. The Intel part has a TDP of 6 W, is an IGP with no slot width beyond that designation, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The RX 9060 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface; the Intel part uses a Ring Bus. Display outputs on the RX 9060 are 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a; the Intel part's outputs are portable device dependent.

Release dates differ by roughly seven months. The RX 9060 was released on 2025-08-04, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile was released on 2024-12-31. Both are listed as Active in production status. The RX 9060's predecessor is Navi III, and it has no successor listed. The Intel part has no predecessor and no successor listed. Neither part has a launch MSRP in the database.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Radeon RX 9060 compare to the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile in benchmark scores?

A: The RX 9060 has an average benchmark score of 16,014 with multiple recorded tests, while the Intel part has an average score of 0 and no benchmark entries in the database.

Q: What is the performance difference in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The RX 9060 scores 3,322 in that test. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded score for this or any other benchmark.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The RX 9060 has 1,792 shading units, compared to 192 on the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile.

Q: What are the memory configurations?

A: The RX 9060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Q: How do the power requirements differ?

A: The RX 9060 has a 132 W TDP, uses a single 8-pin connector, and recommends a 300 W PSU. The Intel part has a 6 W TDP, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU.

Q: Are the API feature levels different?

A: Yes. The RX 9060 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 wins in every measured category because it is the only part with recorded data. Its 16,014 average benchmark score, 59th percentile ranking, and scores across 3DMark, Geekbench, and PassMark give it a clear documented performance profile. It delivers 21.43 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 334.9 GTexel/s texture rate, and 191.4 GPixel/s pixel rate. The nearest rival comparisons show it trading places with the RTX 3060 Ti, R9 370X, RX 7700, and Pro W5500 within a 2.1% band, meaning it sits in established discrete GPU territory.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile wins in the categories that do not require benchmark scores: power efficiency, integration, and portability. Its 6 W TDP versus 132 W, its IGP form factor versus dual-slot, and its ring bus interface versus PCIe 5.0 x16 make it suitable for low-power, space-constrained systems. It uses system shared memory, which removes the need for dedicated VRAM. Its 384.0 GFLOPS of FP32 compute and 12.00 GTexel/s texture rate are much lower than the RX 9060, but they exist in a completely different product class. The Intel part also released earlier on 2024-12-31, while the RX 9060 arrived on 2025-08-04.

For workloads that demand measured graphics performance, the RX 9060 is the only option with evidence. For workloads that require minimal power draw and integrated graphics, the Intel part has the specifications to fit that role, but the database contains no performance validation for it. The RX 9060's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth support high-resolution textures and memory-intensive tasks. The Intel part's system shared memory has no fixed bandwidth figure, making its performance dependent on the host system. The RX 9060's 28 ray tracing cores provide hardware RT support, a feature the Intel part lacks entirely. The RX 9060's 64 ROPs and 112 TMUs vastly outnumber the Intel part's 4 ROPs and 12 TMUs, indicating a large gap in fill-rate capabilities. In any benchmark that has been recorded, the RX 9060 wins. The Intel part simply has no recorded wins.