AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the two products compared here?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is a discrete desktop GPU from the Radeon RX 7000 series, based on the Navi 32 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated graphics processor from the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation, using Xe-LP architecture.

Q: How do their manufacturing processes differ?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT uses a 5 nm process from TSMC and contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown.

Q: What memory configurations do they support?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses System Shared memory with a System Shared bus width, and bandwidth is System Dependent.

Q: What are the thermal design power figures?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has a TDP of 245 W and requires a 550 W suggested PSU. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a TDP of 6 W and has no suggested PSU listed.

Q: Which API features does each support?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2 for AMD, 12 (12_1) for Intel), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card also lists DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) explicitly, while Intel lists DirectX 12 (12_1).

Q: What is the release timeline for each?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT was released on 2023-09-05. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile was released on 2024-12-31.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT dominates in every measured performance category. Its benchmark results include a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 138383, and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 46443. The PassMark suite shows DirectX 10 at 119, DirectX 11 at 232, DirectX 12 at 79, DirectX 9 at 294, G2D at 1161, G3D at 22547, and GPU compute at 12912. The average benchmark score is 22549, placing it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it sits at the 50th percentile. With 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, the integrated part lacks the resources to compete with the discrete card. The data shows that the AMD card wins every single measurable workload category, from synthetic DX12 tests to OpenCL compute. The Intel part's only advantage lies in its power envelope and integrated nature, not in performance results.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT uses RDNA 3.0 architecture on the Navi 32 chip, with the codename Wheat Nas. It belongs to the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. The chip is fabricated at TSMC on a 5 nm process and contains 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². The architecture includes 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, 96 ROPs, and 54 RT cores. The FP32 throughput is 35.17 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 35.17 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses Xe-LP architecture on the Twin Lake chip, part of the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation. It is fabricated at Intel on a 10 nm process. The part has 192 shading units, 12 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, with no RT cores listed. FP32 performance is 384.0 GFLOPS, and FP16 is 768.0 GFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The Intel part's transistor count and die size are unknown.

The architectural gap is substantial. The AMD card has 18 times more shading units, 18 times more TMUs, and 24 times more ROPs. The FP32 throughput difference is roughly 91.6 times in favor of AMD. The Intel part uses a 2:1 FP16 ratio, while AMD achieves a 1:1 ratio, indicating different compute priorities. The AMD card also includes dedicated RT cores, which the Intel part lacks entirely.

Specification Differences

The two products differ in nearly every specification field. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT has a base clock of 1435 MHz, a boost clock of 2544 MHz, and a game clock of 2171 MHz. Memory speed is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1000 MHz, with no game clock listed and System Shared memory speed.

Memory capacity, type, bus width, and bandwidth all differ. AMD offers 12 GB GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. Intel uses System Shared memory with System Dependent bandwidth. The pixel rate for AMD is 244.2 GPixel/s versus 4.000 GPixel/s for Intel. Texture rate is 549.5 GTexel/s versus 12.00 GTexel/s.

The AMD card has a TDP of 245 W, uses a dual-slot cooler with 2x 8-pin power connectors, and requires a 550 W suggested PSU. The Intel part has a 6 W TDP, is an IGP with no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU. The bus interface differs: PCIe 4.0 x16 for AMD, Ring Bus for Intel. Display outputs also differ: AMD provides 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C, while Intel lists Portable Device Dependent outputs.

The AMD card measures 267 mm in length, 135 mm in height, and 50 mm in width. Intel has no dimensions listed. The AMD card's production status is Active, as is Intel's. The launch MSRP for the AMD card is 449 USD, while Intel has no launch MSRP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two products, and the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has zero recorded benchmark scores. However, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT's individual benchmark results provide a clear performance picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3316 reflects modern DirectX 12 rendering capability. Geekbench OpenCL at 138383 and Vulkan at 46443 show strong compute and cross-API performance.

The PassMark suite reveals the card's profile across older APIs. DirectX 9 scores 294, DirectX 11 scores 232, and DirectX 10 scores 119. DirectX 12 scores 79, which is lower than the older API results, indicating the PassMark DX12 test may stress different aspects of the architecture. The G3D score of 22547 and GPU compute score of 12912 align with the average benchmark score of 22549.

Comparing the AMD card to its nearest rivals in the database places its performance in context. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile has an average score of 22435, which is 0.5% lower than the RX 7700 XT. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile scores 22729, which is 0.8% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, 1.5% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 scores 22170, 1.7% lower. These deltas show the RX 7700 XT sits within a tight performance band around these desktop and mobile parts.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no benchmark scores, no nearest rivals, and an average score of 0. Its percentile rank of 50 versus AMD's 67 reflects its position in the overall distribution, but without recorded measurements, no direct numeric comparison is possible. The specification data alone demonstrates the performance chasm: 35.17 TFLOPS versus 384.0 GFLOPS FP32, and 432.0 GB/s versus System Dependent bandwidth.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to a single conclusion for most use cases: the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT is the performance choice by every measurable margin. It delivers 35.17 TFLOPS FP32, 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and 12 GB of GDDR6 memory. Its average benchmark score of 22549 places it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs, and it trades within 1.7% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile, RTX 4060 Mobile, RTX 2080, and AMD Radeon RX 5700. For any workload involving 3D rendering, compute, or modern DirectX 12 titles, the RX 7700 XT is the only part with the resources to handle them.

The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile occupies a different role entirely. With a 6 W TDP, System Shared memory, and no recorded benchmark scores, it suits systems where power consumption and integration matter more than raw output. Its 4.000 GPixel/s pixel rate and 12.00 GTexel/s texture rate are sufficient for basic display output and light 2D workloads, but the lack of RT cores and the 2:1 FP16 ratio limit its compute versatility.

The data shows that the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT should be selected for desktop builds requiring discrete graphics performance, particularly for gaming, content creation, or GPU compute. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile should be selected for portable or low-power devices where the integrated nature and 6 W power draw are the primary considerations. The absence of head-to-head benchmarks and the Intel part's empty results list mean the decision rests on the specification and single-part benchmark data, which overwhelmingly favors the AMD card in performance and the Intel part in efficiency.