AMD Radeon RX 7700 vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile Comparison
AMD Radeon RX 7700
Graphics 24EU Mobile
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7700 vs Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile
Where Each One Wins
The recorded data splits these two graphics solutions into entirely separate performance classes. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 delivers a full suite of benchmark scores across DirectX 9 through DirectX 12, OpenCL, and compute workloads. Its average benchmark score sits at 15,852 points, placing it in the 58th percentile of all GPUs tracked in the database. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, resulting in an average benchmark score of zero and a 50th percentile ranking.
The AMD Radeon RX 7700 wins in every measurable category by default, since the Intel part has no benchmark entries. The RX 7700 shows its strongest showing in the PassMark G3D test with a score of 20,974, followed by the Geekbench OpenCL score of 106,028. The PassMark GPU Compute test returns 10,963 points, and the PassMark G2D test returns 1,206 points. Legacy DirectX tests show scores of 261 for DirectX 9, 186 for DirectX 11, 96 for DirectX 12, and 92 for DirectX 10. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test scores 2,865 points.
The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile is an integrated graphics processor designed for mobile platforms. Its specifications indicate a 6 W TDP and an IGP slot width, meaning it targets low-power portable devices rather than discrete graphics performance. The RX 7700, by contrast, carries a 200 W TDP and a dual-slot cooler, indicating a desktop discrete graphics card.
The use-case split is clear: the RX 7700 handles demanding 3D rendering, gaming, and compute workloads, while the Intel 24EU Mobile serves basic display output and light acceleration for mobile systems. The database shows no overlap in benchmark coverage between the two.
FAQ
Q: What is the average benchmark score for each product?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 has an average benchmark score of 15,852 points. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmark results are recorded for it in the database.
Q: How do the shading unit counts compare?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 contains 2,560 shading units, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile contains 192 shading units. That is a 13.3x difference in shading unit count.
Q: What DirectX versions do the two products support?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.
Q: What memory configurations do the two products use?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 uses 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 624.1 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth.
Q: What are the boost clock speeds?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 boosts to 2459 MHz, with a game clock of 2041 MHz and a base clock of 1900 MHz. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile boosts to 1000 MHz, with a base clock of 300 MHz.
Q: What is the transistor count for each chip?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700 uses the Navi 32 chip with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Twin Lake chip, but its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown in the database.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries comparing the AMD Radeon RX 7700 against the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile. The win counts stand at 0 for both products in the head-to-head category. However, the RX 7700 has a complete benchmark profile, while the Intel part has none.
The RX 7700's PassMark G3D score of 20,974 represents its highest recorded result. Its PassMark GPU Compute score of 10,963 indicates substantial compute throughput. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 106,028 confirms strong general-purpose GPU performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,865 shows modern API rendering capability.
The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile's specifications suggest modest expectations. Its pixel rate is 4.000 GPixel/s, its texture rate is 12.00 GTexel/s, and its FP32 throughput is 384.0 GFLOPS. The RX 7700 delivers a pixel rate of 236.1 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 393.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 throughput of 25.18 TFLOPS. The RX 7700 is 59x faster in pixel rate, 32.8x faster in texture rate, and 65.6x faster in FP32 compute.
The nearest rivals to the RX 7700 in the database provide context for its performance tier. The AMD Radeon R9 370X has an average score of 15,862, which is 0.1% higher than the RX 7700. The AMD Radeon RX 9060 averages 16,014 points, 1% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 averages 15,679 points, 1.1% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti averages 16,129 points, 1.7% higher. The RX 7700 sits within a tight band of roughly 2% of these four rivals, indicating it occupies a well-established performance tier.
Specification Differences
The memory subsystems differ fundamentally. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 624.1 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses system shared memory with a system dependent bandwidth and no dedicated memory bus width.
Clock speeds show a wide gap. The RX 7700 runs at 1900 MHz base, 2041 MHz game, and 2459 MHz boost. The Intel part runs at 300 MHz base and 1000 MHz boost. Memory clocks also differ: the RX 7700 operates at 2438 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective), while the Intel part uses system shared memory with no dedicated clock.
Power and physical specifications diverge sharply. The RX 7700 has a 200 W TDP, a dual-slot form factor, and requires 2x 8-pin power connectors with a suggested 550 W PSU. The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile has a 6 W TDP, uses an IGP form factor, has no power connectors, and lists no suggested PSU.
The bus interfaces differ. The RX 7700 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The Intel part uses a Ring Bus. Display outputs also differ: the RX 7700 provides 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C, while the Intel part lists "Portable Device Dependent" outputs.
Physical dimensions exist only for the RX 7700: 267 mm length, 135 mm height, and 50 mm width. The Intel part has no recorded dimensions. The RX 7700 was released on 2025-09-17, while the Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile was released on 2024-12-31. Neither product has a recorded launch MSRP in the database.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Radeon RX 7700 uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 32 chip, codenamed Wheat Nas, from the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. It is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 81.2M per mm². The Intel Graphics 24EU Mobile uses the Xe-LP architecture with the Twin Lake chip from the HD Graphics-T (Twin Lake) generation. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with transistor count and die size listed as unknown.
The compute units differ substantially. The RX 7700 has 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 96 raster output units, and 40 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 192 shading units, 12 texture mapping units, and 4 raster output units, with no ray tracing cores listed.
The FP16 and FP32 ratios differ. The RX 7700 delivers 25.18 TFLOPS for both FP16 and FP32, indicating a 1:1 ratio. The Intel part delivers 768.0 GFLOPS FP16 and 384.0 GFLOPS FP32, a 2:1 ratio. The RX 7700's predecessor is listed as Navi II and its successor as Navi IV. The Intel part has no predecessor or successor listed.
The API support shows a minor difference: the RX 7700 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The RX 7700 supports PCIe 4.0 x16, while the Intel part uses a Ring Bus. Production status for both is listed as Active.
The architecture gap explains the performance disparity. RDNA 3.0 on 5 nm with 28.1 billion transistors represents a high-end discrete design. Xe-LP on 10 nm with unknown transistor count represents a low-power integrated solution. The 44x difference in shading units, the 32.8x difference in texture rate, and the 59x difference in pixel rate all trace back to these architectural and process node differences.